← Back
NeuroTrials.ai
Neurology Clinical Trial Database

DIAN-TU

Safety and efficacy of long-term gantenerumab treatment in dominantly inherited Alzheimer's disease: an open label extension of the phase 2/3 multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled platform DIAN-TU Trial

Year of Publication: 2025

Authors: Randall J. Bateman, Yan Li, Eric M. McDade, ..., David B. Clifford

Journal: medRxiv (preprint)

Citation: medRxiv 2025.01.29; doi: 10.1101/2024.10.29.24316289

Link: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.29.24316289


Clinical Question

Does long-term high-dose gantenerumab treatment remove brain amyloid plaques and delay the onset of clinical symptoms in asymptomatic carriers of dominantly inherited Alzheimer's disease mutations?

Bottom Line

High-dose gantenerumab significantly removed amyloid plaques over 3 years (PiB-PET SUVR −0.71, p<0.0001), with 45% of the longest-treated subgroup achieving amyloid-normal status. While clinical endpoints were not statistically significant overall, the longest-treated group (~8.4 years) showed a clinically meaningful but statistically uncertain ~50% slowing of CDR-SB progression (HR 0.57). CSF biomarkers of amyloid and tau pathology normalized. These findings provide preliminary evidence that early, sustained amyloid removal may delay symptom onset in DIAD, though the study was underpowered and stopped early.

Major Points

  • Primary endpoint met: PiB-PET SUVR decreased by −0.71 (95% CI −0.88 to −0.53, p<0.0001) from OLE baseline to year 3, confirming substantial amyloid plaque removal
  • Amyloid removal was dose-dependent: 3-fold higher doses produced 3-fold greater annual SUVR reduction (0.35 vs 0.06 per year)
  • At OLE end, 15% converted amyloid-abnormal to normal; in the longest-treated group, 45% achieved amyloid-normal status
  • Any Gant group (n=53 asymptomatic): CDR-SB HR 0.83 (0.50–1.36) and CDR global HR 0.84 (0.40–1.77) — not significant
  • Longest Gant group (n=22, ~8.4 years treatment): CDR-SB HR 0.57 (0.31–1.07), CDR global HR 0.41 (0.14–1.20) — suggestive of ~50% slowing but not significant
  • CSF Aβ42/40 improved significantly (−42 CentiMarker at year 3, p<0.0001), approaching normal levels in asymptomatic participants
  • CSF p-tau181/tau181 improved significantly (−21 CentiMarker at year 3, p<0.0001)
  • No significant treatment effect on Tau-PET, cognitive composite, MMSE, or FAS
  • ARIA incidence: ARIA-E 30% (22/73), ARIA-H microhemorrhage 42% (31/73); higher with APOE ε4 carriers. No ARIA-related deaths. Higher doses produced ~33% more ARIA-E than double-blind period
  • Study stopped early by sponsor (Roche) due to lack of regulatory path for gantenerumab, after most participants completed ~2 years of OLE treatment

Design

Study Type: Open-label extension of randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2/3 platform trial

Randomization: 1

Blinding: Open-label (OLE); assessors blinded to prior treatment assignment

Follow-up Duration: Median 2.64 years OLE (IQR 1.99–2.90); longest-treated subgroup ~8.4 years total

Centers: 18

Countries: Australia, Canada, France, Ireland, Puerto Rico, Spain, UK, USA

Sample Size: 73


Inclusion Criteria

  • Prior participation in DIAN-TU-001 double-blind period
  • Known carrier of PSEN1, PSEN2, or APP mutation causing dominantly inherited Alzheimer's disease
  • Willing to know mutation status
  • Original enrollment: −15 to +10 years from estimated symptom onset
  • CDR global 0 (cognitively normal) to 1 (mild dementia) at original enrollment

Exclusion Criteria

  • Major or unstable illness preventing trial participation
  • Volumetric MRI contraindications
  • Required anticoagulation therapy
  • Screen failure due to inability to receive drug or complete safety assessments

Arms

FieldGantenerumab OLEControlControl
InterventionGantenerumab titrated from 120 mg Q4W up to 1020–1500 mg SC Q2W; average titration to max dose ~19 months; 78% reached highest doseExternal controls from DIAN Observational Study plus internal controls (placebo-treated in double-blind phase)Main set controls plus OLE baseline values for participants who were placebo/solanezumab-treated in double-blind and entered OLE
Duration

Outcomes

OutcomeTypeControlInterventionHR / OR / RRP-value
PiB-PET SUVR change from OLE baseline to year 3: −0.71 (95% CI −0.88 to −0.53, p<0.0001) | PiB-PET SUVR at year 1: −0.12 (p=0.012); year 2: −0.47 (p<0.0001) | 15% converted abnormal to normal; 15% remained normal; 70% remained abnormal | Longest-treated group: 45% achieved amyloid-normal statusPrimaryp<0.0001
CDR global time to first progression (Any Gant vs main controls): HR 0.84 (0.40–1.77)Secondary0.84
CDR-SB recurrent progression (Any Gant vs main controls): HR 0.83 (0.50–1.36)Secondary0.83
Longest Gant CDR global vs main controls: HR 0.41 (0.14–1.20)Secondary0.41
Longest Gant CDR-SB vs main controls: HR 0.57 (0.31–1.07)Secondary0.57
Longest Gant CDR-SB vs extended controls: HR 0.52 (0.30–0.92, p=0.024)Secondary0.52p=0.024
CSF Aβ42/40 at year 3: −42 CentiMarker (95% CI −52 to −31, p<0.0001)Secondaryp<0.0001
CSF p-tau181/tau181 at year 3: −21 CentiMarker (95% CI −25 to −17, p<0.0001)Secondaryp<0.0001
No significant differences in cognitive composite, MMSE, FAS, or Tau-PET between treated and controlsSecondary
ARIA-EAdverse30% (22/73); higher in APOE ε4 homozygotes (67%) vs heterozygotes (26%) vs non-carriers (29%)
ARIA-H microhemorrhageAdverse42% (31/73)
Combined ARIA (E+H)Adverse53% (39/73)
Most common TEAEsAdverseinjection-site reactions (70%), upper respiratory infections (59%), upper respiratory symptoms (45%)
SAEsAdverse12% (9/73); 4 nervous system SAEs
Treatment discontinuation due to AEAdverse3% (2/73)
No deaths during OLE; no cerebral macrohemorrhagesAdverseNo deaths during OLE; no cerebral macrohemorrhages

Subgroup Analysis

Longest Gant subgroup (n=22, ~8.4 years total treatment) showed the most favorable clinical trends: CDR-SB HR 0.57, CDR global HR 0.41, FAS HR 0.59, MMSE HR 0.54. APOE ε4 homozygotes had highest ARIA-E rates (67%). Prior gantenerumab-treated participants showed greater amyloid reduction from double-blind baseline (−0.44 SUVR) vs prior placebo (−0.07 SUVR, NS).


Criticisms

  • Study stopped early by sponsor, limiting statistical power and duration of follow-up
  • Small sample size (n=73 OLE, n=22 longest-treated) insufficient for definitive clinical conclusions
  • Open-label design introduces potential measurement and selection bias despite blinding of assessors
  • Use of external controls from observational study introduces confounding
  • Only 18% completed the planned 3-year treatment; 64% stopped due to sponsor termination
  • Incomplete amyloid removal — 70% of overall group remained amyloid-abnormal at study end
  • No significant effect on tau PET, cognitive composite, MMSE, or functional measures in overall group
  • ~1 year treatment gap between double-blind and OLE periods may have reduced treatment effect
  • Results in dominantly inherited AD may not generalize to sporadic late-onset AD

Funding

National Institute on Aging (NIA), Alzheimer's Association, GHR Foundation, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd/Genentech

Based on: DIAN-TU (medRxiv (preprint), 2025)

Authors: Randall J. Bateman, Yan Li, Eric M. McDade, ..., David B. Clifford

Citation: medRxiv 2025.01.29; doi: 10.1101/2024.10.29.24316289

Content summarized and formatted by NeuroTrials.ai.