← Back
NeuroTrials.ai
Neurology Clinical Trial Database

FUS-Aducanumab

Ultrasound Blood-Brain Barrier Opening and Aducanumab in Alzheimer's Disease

Year of Publication: 2024

Authors: Ali R. Rezai, Pierre-Francois D'Haese, Victor Finomore, ..., Marc W. Haut

Journal: New England Journal of Medicine

Citation: N Engl J Med 2024;390:55-62

Link: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2308719


Clinical Question

Can combining focused ultrasound blood-brain barrier opening with aducanumab infusion enhance amyloid removal in targeted brain regions compared to aducanumab alone (no FUS) in patients with Alzheimer's disease?

Bottom Line

In this proof-of-concept safety/feasibility trial of 3 participants, combining focused ultrasound blood-brain barrier opening with aducanumab was safe (no ARIA, no treatment-related SAEs) and produced numerically greater amyloid reduction in FUS-treated regions than in contralateral homologous regions receiving aducanumab alone (no FUS), with differences of 48, 49, and 63 percentage points at 26 weeks

Major Points

  • Proof-of-concept, single-arm safety/feasibility trial in 3 participants with mild Alzheimer's disease
  • MRI-guided focused ultrasound temporarily opened blood-brain barrier (closed within 24-48 hours)
  • Six monthly combination treatments with escalating aducanumab doses (1-6 mg/kg)
  • Amyloid reduction 48, 49, and 63 percentage points greater in FUS-treated regions vs contralateral homologous regions (aducanumab alone, no FUS)
  • Mean 32% SUVR reduction in FUS-treated regions combined across 3 participants
  • APOE ε4 carriers excluded as ARIA risk mitigation strategy
  • No ARIA observed; aducanumab dose capped at 6 mg/kg (below on-label 10 mg/kg)
  • Headaches were most common adverse event; no serious neurological events during treatment phase
  • One participant showed cognitive decline at 30-day follow-up on RBANS (76→61)

Design

Study Type: Investigator-initiated, prospective, open-label, single-group, single-institution, proof-of-concept trial

Randomization:

Blinding: Open-label; contralateral homologous regions (aducanumab alone, no FUS) served as internal control

Enrollment Period: Not specified

Follow-up Duration: 6 months treatment + 180 days follow-up (Participant 1), 90 days (Participant 2), 30 days (Participant 3)

Centers: 1

Countries: United States

Sample Size: 3

Analysis: Within-subject comparison of FUS-treated regions vs contralateral homologous regions (aducanumab alone, no FUS); PET SUVR and centiloid quantification


Inclusion Criteria

  • Age 50-85 years
  • Diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer's disease or mild Alzheimer's disease dementia per NIA-AA criteria
  • Elevated brain amyloid (SUVR >1.4) on 18F-florbetaben PET in signature Alzheimer's disease regions
  • Elevated CSF phosphorylated tau (>21.7 pg/mL)
  • Progressive cognitive loss with abnormal performance (≥1 SD below expected) on neuropsychological testing
  • MRI showing temporal or parietal lobe atrophy without other pathology
  • Meets indications for aducanumab per prescribing information

Exclusion Criteria

  • APOE ε4 carriers (heterozygotes or homozygotes) - risk mitigation for ARIA
  • Negative amyloid PET

Baseline Characteristics

CharacteristicParticipant 1 (77yo male)Participant 2 (59yo male)Participant 3 (64yo female)
Baseline amyloid (signature regions), centiloids203139285
Baseline amyloid (FUS target region), centiloids224.2185.6251.5
Baseline amyloid (contralateral region, aducanumab alone, no FUS), centiloids219.7129.3246.9
FUS treatment volumeUp to 10 mlUp to 20 mlUp to 40 ml
FUS treatment locationRight frontal lobeLeft frontal and parietal lobesLeft frontal, parietal, temporal lobes and hippocampus

Arms

FieldAducanumab + Focused Ultrasound
InterventionMonthly IV aducanumab (1 mg/kg x2, 3 mg/kg x2, 6 mg/kg x2) with MRI-guided focused ultrasound blood-brain barrier opening 2 hours after each infusion; FUS applied to one hemisphere only, contralateral homologous regions receive aducanumab alone (no FUS)
Duration6 months (intervention phase) + follow-up with 10 mg/kg aducanumab alone

Outcomes

OutcomeTypeControlInterventionHR / OR / RRP-value
Safety and feasibility of combining focused ultrasound blood-brain barrier opening with aducanumab (per paper's stated aim and ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05469009 registered primary measure of treatment-related AEs/SAEs)PrimaryControl (Contralateral, aducanumab alone, no FUS): N/A - within-subject design · Intervention (FUS + aducanumab): 0 treatment-related SAEs; 0 ARIA; headache most common AE (mild, all resolved); BBB closed within 24-48 hours in all participants; all 3 completed 6 monthly combination treatments
Amyloid change in FUS-treated regions, baseline to 26 weeks (centiloids)SecondaryContralateral (aducanumab alone, no FUS): P1 219.7→218.1; P2 129.3→135.8; P3 246.9→238.4FUS-treated: P1 224.2→115.2; P2 185.6→104.6; P3 251.5→84.9
Additional amyloid reduction with FUS vs contralateral (Participant 1)SecondaryReference (aducanumab alone, no FUS)107.5 centiloids greater reduction (difference, 48 percentage points)
Additional amyloid reduction with FUS vs contralateral (Participant 2)SecondaryReference (aducanumab alone, no FUS)87.6 centiloids greater reduction (difference, 49 percentage points)
Additional amyloid reduction with FUS vs contralateral (Participant 3)SecondaryReference (aducanumab alone, no FUS)158.1 centiloids greater reduction (difference, 63 percentage points)
Mean SUVR reduction in FUS-treated regions (combined, 3 participants)SecondaryReference (aducanumab alone, no FUS)32% reduction at 26 weeks
Blood-brain barrier closureSecondary24-48 hours post-procedure in all participants
Serious adverse events (treatment-related)Adverse0 treatment-related SAEs; 1 grade 1 SAE (passive thoughts of death) adjudicated as unrelated to intervention
HeadacheAdverseMost common AE; mild except one moderate; all resolved
ARIAAdverse0 (none observed)
Head/neck positioning discomfort during FUSAdverse2 severe events in one participant (resolved immediately after procedure)
Cognitive declineAdverse1 participant (RBANS 76→61 at day 30; no neurological change or ADLI change)
Behavioral symptomsAdverseMild increase in Participant 3 (agitation, sleep disturbance, appetite fluctuation on NPI)
Neurologic exam findingsAdverseTwo instances of mild left-arm pronator drift in Participant 2 (intermittently present before enrollment)

Subgroup Analysis

Individual participant analysis showed consistent pattern of greater amyloid reduction in FUS-treated regions across all three participants with varying baseline amyloid loads and treatment volumes.


Criticisms

  • Very small sample size (n=3) limits generalizability
  • Open-label design without true randomization
  • APOE ε4 carriers excluded - cannot assess safety in highest-risk population for ARIA
  • Aducanumab dose capped at 6 mg/kg (below on-label 10 mg/kg) as risk mitigation
  • Staggered follow-up (30-180 days) limits consistent outcome assessment
  • Did not directly measure antibody penetration - enhanced delivery inferred from amyloid reduction
  • One participant showed cognitive decline during follow-up
  • Single institution experience
  • Contralateral homologous regions as internal control may not fully account for systemic effects or hemispheric asymmetry

Funding

Harry T. Mangurian, Jr. Foundation and West Virginia University Rockefeller Neuroscience Institute

Based on: FUS-Aducanumab (New England Journal of Medicine, 2024)

Authors: Ali R. Rezai, Pierre-Francois D'Haese, Victor Finomore, ..., Marc W. Haut

Citation: N Engl J Med 2024;390:55-62

Content summarized and formatted by NeuroTrials.ai.