PD SURG
(2010)Objective
To assess whether DBS plus best medical therapy improved quality of life more than best medical therapy alone in advanced PD
Study Summary
• 19% of surgery patients had serious surgery-related adverse events including 1 death
Intervention
Bilateral STN-DBS (97%) plus best medical therapy vs best medical therapy alone
Inclusion Criteria
PD per UK Brain Bank criteria, inadequate symptom control, DRS-II >5, fitness for surgery
Study Design
Arms: DBS + best medical therapy vs Best medical therapy alone
Patients per Arm: 183 vs 183
Outcome
• Secondary: UPDRS motor (off) -17.2 vs -0.4 (P<0.0001); 48% vs 14% no dyskinesia (P<0.0001)
Bottom Line
In patients with advanced PD on best medical therapy, DBS surgery improved quality of life (PDQ-39) by 5.0 points vs medical therapy at 1 year (P=0.001). Both STN and GPi targets used. 366 patients randomized. Published Lancet Neurology 2010 (Williams et al.). Pragmatic UK trial (Birmingham PD SURG).
Major Points
- PDQ-39 improved: -5.0 points difference favoring DBS at 1 year (P=0.001).
- UPDRS-III off-medication: DBS -14.2 vs medical -1.5 (P<0.001).
- LEDD reduced 29% with DBS vs increased 5% with medical therapy.
- 366 patients, 13 UK centers, 1:1. Pragmatic — both STN (174) and GPi (9) targets allowed.
- AEs: 3% serious surgical complications (hemorrhage, infection). 1 death from hemorrhage.
- Quality of life benefit sustained at 1 year across multiple PDQ-39 domains.
- Patients recruited had advanced PD with motor complications despite optimized medical therapy.
- Published Lancet Neurology 2010 (Williams et al.). NIHR funded.
- Complemented EARLYSTIM (earlier DBS) — PD SURG showed benefit even in more advanced patients.
- STN was the predominant target (95%); GPi used in a minority.
Study Design
- Study Type
- Randomized, open-label
- Blinding
- Open-label
- Sample Size
- 366
- Follow-up
- 1 year
- Centers
- 13
Primary Outcome
Definition: PDQ-39 summary index at 1 year
| Control | Intervention | HR/OR | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| -0.3 points | -5.0 points | - | 0.001 |
Limitations & Criticisms
- Open-label design
- No sham surgery control
- 19% serious surgery-related adverse events
- Smaller effect than 6-month trials
Citation
Lancet Neurol 2010;9:581-91