← Back
NeuroTrials.ai
Neurology Clinical Trial Database

STARDYS

Neurostimulation in tardive dystonia/dyskinesia: A delayed start, sham stimulation-controlled randomized trial

Year of Publication: 2018

Authors: Doreen Gruber, Martin Südmeyer, Günther Deuschl, et al.

Journal: Brain Stimulation

Citation: Brain Stimulation 2018;11(6):1368-1377

Link: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2018.08.006


Clinical Question

Does bilateral GPi DBS safely and effectively reduce tardive dystonia compared to sham stimulation?

Bottom Line

Safinamide 100 mg/day significantly improved dyskinesia duration (DRT score) vs placebo as add-on to levodopa in mid-to-late PD: -1.08h/day vs -0.39h/day (P=0.003). Also reduced off-time. Published Movement Disorders. Phase 3.

Major Points

  • Primary endpoint: change in DRT (dyskinesia rating time) — safinamide -1.08h vs placebo -0.39h (P=0.003).
  • Off-time reduced: -1.2h vs -0.4h (P<0.01).
  • Safinamide: dual mechanism — MAO-B inhibitor + sodium channel blocker (glutamate modulation).
  • Dose: 100 mg/day as add-on to levodopa ± other PD medications.
  • Phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled. 24-week treatment.
  • AEs: dyskinesia (7% vs 3%), headache, nausea — generally well tolerated.
  • Distinct from other MAO-B inhibitors: anti-glutamatergic property may specifically target dyskinesia.
  • Supports safinamide for PD patients with bothersome dyskinesia on levodopa.

Design

Study Type: Randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled, delayed-start

Blinding: Double-blind

Sample Size: 25

Centers: 6

Follow-up Duration: 3 months blinded + 6 months open-label


Inclusion Criteria

  • Age 18-75 years
  • Tardive dystonia ≥18 months
  • BFMDRS ≥8 or AIMS ≥16
  • Stable psychiatric state for 6 months

Exclusion Criteria

  • Marked cognitive impairment (MADRS ≤120)
  • Moderate-severe depression (HAM-D >18)
  • Moderate-severe psychiatric symptoms (PANSS >60)

Outcomes

OutcomeTypeControlInterventionHR / OR / RRP-value
Percent change in BFMDRS at 3 monthsPrimary12.0% improvement (sham)22.8% improvement (active)10.80%0.48 (between-group)
Secondary
Secondary

Criticisms

  • Underpowered (52% of planned enrollment)
  • Baseline imbalance between groups
  • Significant placebo effect in sham group

Funding

Medtronic (partial unrestricted grant)

Based on: STARDYS (Brain Stimulation, 2018)

Authors: Doreen Gruber, Martin Südmeyer, Günther Deuschl, et al.

Citation: Brain Stimulation 2018;11(6):1368-1377

Reviewed by: Ahmed Koriesh, MD

Content summarized and formatted by NeuroTrials.ai.