← Back
NeuroTrials.ai
Neurology Clinical Trial Database

TEMPO-1

Fixed-Dose Tavapadon for Early Parkinson Disease: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Year of Publication: 2026

Authors: Pahwa R, Moro E, Espay AJ, ..., Antonini A

Journal: JAMA Neurology

Citation: JAMA Neurol. 2026;83(5):452-460. doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2026.0590

Link: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2026.0590


Clinical Question

Can fixed-dose tavapadon, a selective D1/D5 agonist, improve motor function in early Parkinson disease while avoiding the adverse effects of D2/D3 agonists?

Bottom Line

In adults with early Parkinson disease, both fixed doses of tavapadon (5 mg and 15 mg once daily) produced clinically meaningful improvements in motor function (MDS-UPDRS parts II+III) with an acceptable safety profile, supporting tavapadon as a potential alternative to conventional D2/D3 dopamine agonists.

Major Points

  • Both tavapadon 5 mg and 15 mg significantly improved MDS-UPDRS parts II+III combined scores at week 26 vs placebo (treatment differences −11.5 and −12.1 points, respectively; both P<.001)
  • Large effect sizes (Cohen's d = 1.14 for 5 mg; d = 1.20 for 15 mg) suggest clinically meaningful motor improvement
  • Tavapadon-treated participants showed a ~9.7-10.2 point decrease in MDS-UPDRS parts II+III, while placebo participants worsened by 1.8 points
  • Most common adverse events were nausea (25.4%), headache (16.7%), and dizziness (12.7%); most AEs were mild to moderate
  • Premature discontinuation was higher with tavapadon (24.3% at 5 mg, 33.3% at 15 mg) than placebo (15.4%), driven largely by adverse events
  • Tavapadon represents the first selective D1/D5 agonist evaluated in phase 3 for early PD, offering a mechanistically distinct alternative to existing dopaminergic therapies

Design

Study Type: Phase 3, prospective, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group randomized clinical trial

Randomization: 1

Blinding: Double-blind (participants, investigators, and blinded sponsor personnel remained blinded until final database lock); identical-appearing tablets and packaging

Allocation: 1:1:1 randomization to tavapadon 5 mg, tavapadon 15 mg, or placebo using a computer-generated randomization scheme, stratified by concomitant MAO-B inhibitor use

Enrollment Period: December 2019 to June 2024

Follow-up Duration: 27-week treatment period followed by 4-week safety follow-up (total ~34 weeks including screening)

Centers: 102

Countries:

Sample Size: 529

Analyzed: 520

Analysis: Modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population (all randomized participants who received ≥1 dose and had baseline and ≥1 postbaseline MDS-UPDRS assessment); mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM) for continuous endpoints; generalized linear mixed model with logit link for PGIC responder analysis; hierarchical testing procedure (15 mg vs placebo first, then 5 mg vs placebo)

Power Calculation: Sample size of 174 per group provided ≥90% power to detect a 4-point treatment difference (2-sided α=0.05; assumed SD=9 points; 27% dropout rate)

Registration: NCT04201093


Inclusion Criteria

  • Adults aged 40 to 80 years
  • Diagnosis of Parkinson disease consistent with UK Parkinson's Disease Society Brain Bank diagnostic criteria
  • Modified Hoehn and Yahr score of 1, 1.5, or 2
  • Disease duration of 3 years or less
  • Treatment naive or <3 months of prior levodopa or dopamine agonist therapy
  • Concurrent MAO-B inhibitor use permitted if initiated <90 days before baseline with stable dose during the trial

Exclusion Criteria

  • History of essential tremor
  • Atypical or secondary parkinsonian syndromes
  • Clinically significant medical or psychiatric condition per investigator discretion
  • Cognitive impairment
  • Abnormal laboratory values during screening
  • Use of any other PD medications (other than permitted MAO-B inhibitors)

Baseline Characteristics

CharacteristicPlacebo (n=175)Tavapadon 5 mg (n=177)Tavapadon 15 mg (n=177)
Mean Age (y)63.563.763.8
Female %3637.332.8
White %9698.397.2
Years Since Diagnosis (mean)0.690.750.76
H&Y Stage 1 %13.118.620.3
H&Y Stage 1.5 %13.116.47.9
H&Y Stage 2 %73.76571.8
MDS-UPDRS Part I5.25.14.8
MDS-UPDRS Part II7.47.17.7
MDS-UPDRS Part III24.724.124.3
MDS-UPDRS Parts II+III3231.332.1
CGI-S Score333.1
MAO-B Inhibitor Use %2426.627.1

Arms

FieldControlTavapadon 5 mgTavapadon 15 mg
N175177177
InterventionPlacebo once daily, identical in appearance to active tabletsTavapadon 5 mg once daily, titrated to target dose by ~week 6Tavapadon 15 mg once daily, titrated to target dose by ~week 10
Duration27 weeks27 weeks27 weeks

Outcomes

OutcomeTypeControlInterventionHR / OR / RRP-value
Least-squares mean change from baseline to week 26 in MDS-UPDRS parts II and III combined scorePrimary1.8-point increase (worsening) with placebo9.7-point decrease with tavapadon 5 mg; 10.2-point decrease with tavapadon 15 mg<.001 (both doses vs placebo)
SecondaryKey secondary endpoint; analyzed via hierarchical testing (specific numerical values not reported in source excerpt)
SecondaryKey secondary endpoint; analyzed via hierarchical testing (specific numerical values not reported in source excerpt)
SafetyFavorable safety profile; most AEs nonserious, mild to moderate
SafetyPlacebo: 27/175 (15.4%); Tavapadon 5 mg: 43/177 (24.3%); Tavapadon 15 mg: 59/177 (33.3%); leading reasons were AEs and participant withdrawal
90/354 (25.4%)Adverse
59/354 (16.7%)Adverse
45/354 (12.7%)Adverse
6/175 (3.4%)Adverse
29/177 (16.4%)Adverse
35/177 (19.8%)Adverse
2/175Adverse
1/177Adverse
0/177Adverse

Criticisms

  • Predominantly White population (97.2%) limits generalizability across racial/ethnic groups
  • Higher discontinuation rates in tavapadon arms (24-33%) vs placebo (15%) raise tolerability concerns over longer-term use
  • 27-week treatment period is relatively short for a chronic, progressive disease; long-term durability and dyskinesia risk remain to be established
  • No active comparator (e.g., levodopa or conventional D2/D3 dopamine agonist) — comparative efficacy/safety cannot be determined from this trial alone
  • Fixed-dose design without individual titration may not reflect real-world clinical practice

Based on: TEMPO-1 (JAMA Neurology, 2026)

Authors: Pahwa R, Moro E, Espay AJ, ..., Antonini A

Citation: JAMA Neurol. 2026;83(5):452-460. doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2026.0590

Content summarized and formatted by NeuroTrials.ai.