← Back
NeuroTrials.ai
Neurology Clinical Trial Database

VIBRANT-HD

Oral splicing modulator branaplam in Huntington's disease: a phase 2 randomized controlled trial

Year of Publication: 2026

Authors: Borowsky B et al.

Journal: Nature Medicine

Citation: Nat Med. 2026 Jan 5;DOI:10.1038/s41591-025-04117-4

Link: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-025-04117-4

Bottom Line

Branaplam 56 mg weekly lowered CSF mHTT by 25.2% (placebo-corrected) at week 17 but caused peripheral neuropathy in 85.7% of treated participants, leading to early termination and discontinuation of Novartis's HD development program.

Major Points

  • First oral splicing modulator shown to lower CSF mHTT in people with HD (−25.2% placebo-corrected at week 17)
  • Dose-limiting peripheral neuropathy emerged in 18/21 branaplam-treated participants, triggering early study termination
  • Serum NfL elevation (≥2× baseline or >100 pg/mL) in 76.2% of branaplam vs 0% placebo participants — confirmed as early biomarker of neurotoxicity
  • All peripheral neuropathy signs/symptoms were partially or fully reversible after discontinuation
  • Translational PK-PD modeling showed no alternative dose could achieve ≥30% mHTT lowering without neurotoxicity, ending HD development of branaplam

Design

Study Type: Randomized Controlled Trial (Phase 2b)

Randomization: 1

Blinding: Double-blind, placebo-controlled

Enrollment Period: January 10, 2022 - July 4, 2022 (Cohort 1; trial terminated August 5, 2022)

Follow-up Duration: Up to 69 weeks (active arm); 33 weeks (placebo)

Centers: 12

Countries: Canada, France, Germany, Spain, Hungary

Sample Size: 26

Analysis: Descriptive (planned primary analyses voided by early termination); post hoc external control from TRACK-HD


Inclusion Criteria

  • Adults aged >25 to ≤75 years
  • Confirmed stage 1 or 2 Huntington's disease (Shoulson and Fahn)
  • ≥40 CAG repeats in the huntingtin gene
  • UHDRS Total Functional Capacity (TFC) score >8
  • Able to provide written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

  • Comorbidities expected to limit tolerability or interpretation
  • Pre-existing peripheral neuropathy or significant neurologic comorbidity
  • Pregnancy or unwillingness to use contraception
  • Recent exposure to HTT-lowering investigational therapies
  • Contraindications to repeated lumbar puncture or MRI

Baseline Characteristics

CharacteristicControlActive
N521
Treatment ExposureFollowed to week 335-22 weeks before discontinuation; followed up to week 69
NotesDisease characteristics similar to active arm despite small N and gender imbalance
DoseBranaplam 56 mg oral solution weekly
Disease StageStage 1 or 2 HD, UHDRS-TFC >8, ≥40 CAG repeats

Arms

FieldBranaplam 56 mgControl
InterventionBranaplam 56 mg oral solution once weeklyMatching placebo once weekly
DurationPlanned 17-week dose-range finding + 53-week blinded extension + 1-year OLE; actual exposure 5-22 weeks before terminationUp to 33 weeks at termination

Outcomes

OutcomeTypeControlInterventionHR / OR / RRP-value
Percent change in CSF mutant huntingtin (mHTT) from baseline to week 17Primary−1.4% (SE 10.26, n=4)−26.6% (SE 7.45, n=9)Descriptive only — planned MCP-Mod analysis voided by early termination
UHDRS-TFC change from baselineSecondaryAnnual rate of declineConsistent with annual rate of declineNot significant
UHDRS Total Motor Score (TMS)SecondaryAnnual rate of declineConsistent with annual rate of declineNot significant
composite UHDRS (cUHDRS)SecondaryAnnual rate of declineConsistent with annual rate of declineNot significant
Whole-brain volume change (MRI)SecondaryNo meaningful differenceNo meaningful differenceNot significant
Caudate volume change (MRI)SecondaryNo meaningful differenceNo meaningful differenceNot significant
Lateral ventricle volume change at week 17SecondaryReferenceIncreased vs placebo
Cognition (SWRT, SDMT, MoCA)SecondaryNo changeNo changeNot significant
Any AEAdverse85.7% (18/21) branaplam vs 40.0% (2/5) placebo
Treatment-related AEAdverse66.7% (14/21) branaplam vs 20.0% (1/5) placebo
Serious AEAdverse19.0% (4/21) branaplam vs 0% placebo
Treatment-related SAEAdverse14.3% (3/21) — 2 subdural hematomas, 1 vestibular neuronitis
AE leading to discontinuationAdverse9.5% (2/21) branaplam vs 0% placebo
Peripheral neuropathy signs/symptomsAdverse85.7% (18/21) branaplam vs ~20% (1/5) placebo
Reduced sural SNAP amplitude ≥50%Adverse52.4% (11/21) branaplam vs 0% placebo
Reduced tibial CMAP amplitude ≥50%Adverse14.3% (3/21) branaplam vs 20% (1/5) placebo
Abnormal neuro exam (reduced motor/reflexes/sensory)Adverse61.9% (13/21) branaplam vs 0% placebo
Neuropathy symptoms on questionnaireAdverse28.6% (6/21) branaplam vs 20% (1/5) placebo
Serum NfL elevationAdverse76.2% branaplam vs 0% placebo
CSF NfL elevationAdverse61.9% branaplam vs 0% placebo
ReversibilityAdverseAll neuropathy signs/symptoms partially or fully resolved by week 69 follow-up

Subgroup Analysis

Post hoc external control from propensity-matched TRACK-HD cohort (1:1 with 26 participants); volumetric trajectories after discontinuation similar to natural history


Criticisms

  • Early termination after only Cohort 1 (n=26) — planned 75 participants across three dose levels never reached; higher doses not tested
  • Severe arm imbalance: only 5 placebo participants vs 21 active; placebo follow-up just 33 weeks vs 69 weeks active
  • Primary endpoint analysis (MCP-Mod) voided — efficacy reported only descriptively
  • No cohorts at lower doses, so safety-efficacy threshold for branaplam in HD was inferred from translational PK-PD modeling rather than tested clinically
  • External TRACK-HD control used post hoc to address imbalance — propensity matching has residual confounding risk
  • CSF NfL not measured after treatment discontinuation, limiting CNS recovery characterization

Funding

Novartis Pharmaceuticals

Based on: VIBRANT-HD (Nature Medicine, 2026)

Authors: Borowsky B et al.

Citation: Nat Med. 2026 Jan 5;DOI:10.1038/s41591-025-04117-4

Content summarized and formatted by NeuroTrials.ai.