← Back
NeuroTrials.ai
Neurology Clinical Trial Database

NEURO-TTR

Inotersen Treatment for Patients with Hereditary Transthyretin Amyloidosis

Year of Publication: 2018

Authors: M.D. Benson, M. Waddington-Cruz, J.L. Berk, ..., and T. Coelho

Journal: New England Journal of Medicine

Citation: N Engl J Med 2018;379:22-31

Link: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1716793

PDF: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1716793


Clinical Question

Does inotersen, a 2′-O-methoxyethyl–modified antisense oligonucleotide targeting transthyretin mRNA, improve neuropathy and quality of life in patients with hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis with polyneuropathy?

Bottom Line

Inotersen significantly improved both co-primary endpoints at 66 weeks: mNIS+7 (difference −19.7; P<0.001) and Norfolk QOL-DN (difference −11.7; P<0.001) vs placebo. Benefits were consistent across mutation type, disease stage, and cardiomyopathy status. However, serious safety signals — glomerulonephritis (3%) and severe thrombocytopenia (3%, with 1 fatal case) — necessitated enhanced monitoring programs. Published simultaneously with the APOLLO patisiran trial, providing two distinct therapeutic approaches for hATTR.

Major Points

  • NEURO-TTR was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial of 172 patients (112 inotersen, 60 placebo) at 24 centers in 10 countries, conducted from March 2013 to November 2017.
  • Patients had stage 1 or 2 hATTR polyneuropathy with NIS 10–130 and documented TTR mutation with amyloid deposits. Approximately half had Val30Met mutation; 63% had cardiomyopathy.
  • Both co-primary endpoints were met: mNIS+7 LS mean difference of −19.7 (95% CI −26.4 to −13.0; P<0.001) and Norfolk QOL-DN difference of −11.7 (95% CI −18.3 to −5.1; P<0.001).
  • 36% of inotersen patients showed no worsening on mNIS+7, and 50% improved on Norfolk QOL-DN, demonstrating meaningful clinical benefit beyond just slowing progression.
  • Efficacy was consistent across all 16 prespecified subgroups: Val30Met vs non-Val30Met, stage 1 vs stage 2, with vs without cardiomyopathy, and with vs without prior stabilizer therapy.
  • Serious safety concerns emerged: glomerulonephritis in 3 patients (3%), severe thrombocytopenia in 3 patients (3%) with one fatal intracranial hemorrhage, necessitating an FDA-mandated REMS program with enhanced platelet monitoring.
  • Five deaths occurred in the inotersen group vs 0 in placebo, though most were attributed to disease progression. The thrombocytopenia-related death led to enhanced monitoring requirements.
  • 81% of inotersen patients completed the trial (22% discontinued for adverse events) vs 87% placebo (5% discontinued for progression), reflecting the safety challenges of this antisense approach.

Design

Study Type: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial; 2:1 randomization; 15-month intervention with 6-month post-intervention follow-up; stratified by Val30Met status, disease stage, and prior stabilizer use

Randomization: 1

Blinding: Double-blind

Centers: 0

Countries:

Sample Size: 172


Baseline Characteristics

CharacteristicControlActive

Arms

FieldExperimentalControl
InterventionInotersen 300 mg SC weekly (3 loading doses in week 1, then once weekly for 64 weeks) plus vitamin A supplementation (~3000 IU/day)Matching placebo SC on same schedule plus vitamin A supplementation
Duration

Outcomes

OutcomeTypeControlInterventionHR / OR / RRP-value
mNIS+7 LS mean change from baseline to week 66 (inotersen minus placebo): −19.7 (95% CI −26.4 to −13.0); P<0.001 | Norfolk QOL-DN LS mean change from baseline to week 66: −11.7 (95% CI −18.3 to −5.1); P<0.001PrimaryP<0.001
mNIS+7 absolute change: inotersen +5.8 vs placebo +25.5Secondary
Norfolk QOL-DN absolute change: inotersen +1.0 vs placebo +12.7Secondary
Improvement in mNIS+7 (no increase from baseline): 36% inotersenSecondary
Improvement in Norfolk QOL-DN: 50% inotersenSecondary
Subgroups consistent: Val30Met −18.9, non-Val30Met −21.3; stage 1 −14.2, stage 2 −29.1Secondary
Not reportedAdverseNo adverse event data extracted for this trial

Funding

Ionis Pharmaceuticals

Based on: NEURO-TTR (New England Journal of Medicine, 2018)

Authors: M.D. Benson, M. Waddington-Cruz, J.L. Berk, ..., and T. Coelho

Citation: N Engl J Med 2018;379:22-31

Content summarized and formatted by NeuroTrials.ai.