PLEO-CMT
(2021)Objective
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of high-dose and low-dose PXT3003 (baclofen/naltrexone/D-sorbitol) compared to placebo in patients with mild to moderate Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1A
Study Summary
• Low-dose PXT3003 did not achieve statistical significance
• Both doses were safe and well-tolerated with no treatment-related serious adverse events
Intervention
PXT3003 high-dose (baclofen 6mg/naltrexone 0.70mg/D-sorbitol 210mg) or low-dose (baclofen 3mg/naltrexone 0.35mg/D-sorbitol 105mg), 5mL orally twice daily for up to 15 months
Inclusion Criteria
Age 16-65 years, genetically proven CMT1A, mild-to-moderate severity (CMTNS-v2 score 2-18), clinically confirmed foot dorsiflexor weakness, ulnar motor nerve conduction velocity ≥15 m/s
Study Design
Arms: High-dose PXT3003 vs Low-dose PXT3003 vs Placebo
Patients per Arm: High-dose: 113 (mFAS: 55), Low-dose: 109 (mFAS: 93), Placebo: 101 (mFAS: 87)
Outcome
• High-dose 10MWT improvement vs placebo: statistically significant (p=0.016)
• Dose-effect relationship: -0.17 points per unit dose increase (p=0.013)
Bottom Line
High-dose PXT3003 significantly improved disability (ONLS score) and mobility (10MWT) in CMT1A patients with a good safety profile, demonstrating a dose-dependent treatment effect that suggests promise as a disease-modifying therapy
Major Points
- High-dose PXT3003 improved ONLS score by -0.37 points vs placebo (p=0.008)
- Low-dose PXT3003 did not achieve statistical significance vs placebo (p=0.287)
- Significant dose-effect relationship: -0.17 points per unit dose increase (p=0.013)
- High-dose improved 10-meter walk test significantly (p=0.016)
- Odds ratio for non-deterioration was 3.39 (p=0.026) for high-dose vs placebo
- Both doses were safe with no treatment-related serious adverse events
- Study affected by intercurrent event (crystal formation in high-dose formulation) requiring early discontinuation of high-dose arm
- Treatment compliance was >90% across all groups
Study Design
- Study Type
- Phase 3, international, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
- Randomization
- Yes
- Blinding
- Double-blind; treatments were liquid formulations indistinguishable by look or taste in identical kits; randomization code created by independent statistician
- Sample Size
- 323
- Follow-up
- Up to 15 months
- Centers
- 30
- Countries
- Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Netherlands, Spain, United Kingdom, USA
Primary Outcome
Definition: Change in Overall Neuropathy Limitations Scale (ONLS) total score from baseline to months 12 and 15 (mean)
| Control | Intervention | HR/OR | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Increased (worsened) | High-dose: Decreased (improved); Low-dose: Decreased (improved) | - (High-dose vs placebo: 97.5% CI [-0.68 to -0.06]) | High-dose vs placebo: 0.008; Low-dose vs placebo: 0.287 |
Limitations & Criticisms
- Intercurrent event (crystal formation in high-dose formulation) led to early discontinuation of high-dose arm and reduced statistical power from 90% to 75%
- High dropout rate (33.7% overall) due to stability issues with high-dose formulation
- Modified full analysis set (mFAS) used instead of original FAS, though sensitivity analyses supported validity
- Short treatment duration (15 months) relative to slow disease progression of CMT1A
- Predominantly White population (>97%) limits generalizability
- Physiological parameters (CMAP, SNAP, nerve conduction velocity) did not show significant improvement
- Low-dose arm did not achieve statistical significance, leaving only single effective dose level
- Potential partial unblinding of placebo group due to high-dose discontinuation
Citation
Orphanet J Rare Dis 2021;16:433