Weekend vs Daily Prednisone in DMD
(2011)Objective
To determine whether weekend prednisone dosing is equivalent to daily dosing in preserving muscle strength in DMD
Study Summary
• Side-effect profiles did not differ between regimens
Intervention
Prednisone 10 mg/kg/week (weekend) vs prednisone 0.75 mg/kg/day (daily)
Inclusion Criteria
Boys aged 4-10 years with Duchenne muscular dystrophy
Study Design
Arms: Weekend prednisone 10 mg/kg/week, Daily prednisone 0.75 mg/kg/day
Patients per Arm: 32 per arm (64 total)
Outcome
• QMT elbow flexors also showed equivalence
• Class I evidence that weekend prednisone is as safe and effective as daily prednisone over 12 months
Bottom Line
Weekend prednisone (5 mg/kg Saturday + Sunday) was equivalent to daily prednisone (0.75 mg/kg/day) in preserving QMT arm and leg strength over 12 months. Weekend dosing preserved growth (6.6 vs 4.1 cm height gain, p=0.002) and bone density (lumbar Z-score +0.26 vs -0.30, p=0.001) significantly better than daily dosing. Class I evidence for weekend prednisone as a safer alternative.
Major Points
- Equivalence met for QMT arm score (p=0.009 lower bound, p<0.0001 upper bound) and QMT leg score
- QMT elbow flexors and all timed function tests (10m walk, 4-stair climb, supine-to-stand) also equivalent
- Weekend dosing significantly preserved height: 6.6 cm vs 4.1 cm growth (p=0.002)
- Weekend dosing preserved bone density: lumbar spine Z-score +0.26 vs -0.30 (p=0.001)
- BMI at 12 months did not differ between groups
- Class I evidence for weekend prednisone as safe and effective alternative to daily dosing
Study Design
- Study Type
- Multicenter, international, prospective, 12-month, randomized, double-blind equivalence study
- Randomization
- Yes
- Blinding
- Double-blind (daily group received placebo on weekends; weekend group received placebo on weekdays)
- Sample Size
- 64
- Follow-up
- 12 months
- Centers
- 12
- Countries
- USA, Canada, Australia, Israel, India
Primary Outcome
Definition: QMT arm score and QMT leg score at 12 months (equivalence design)
| Control | Intervention | HR/OR | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily: reference standard | Weekend: equivalent | - (Arm score: equivalence met (p=0.009 lower, p<0.0001 upper); Leg score: equivalence met) | Equivalence established |
Limitations & Criticisms
- Small sample size (64 patients) limits power for equivalence testing
- 12-month follow-up may miss long-term differences in efficacy or safety
- Some secondary measures (MMT, grip, knee, FVC, FEV1) did NOT meet equivalence -- suggesting weekend may not be fully equivalent on all measures
- Femoral bone density not assessed (only lumbar spine)
- Only compared two dosing regimens; did not test intermittent daily or alternate-day dosing
Citation
Escolar DM et al. Neurology. 2011 Aug 2;77(5):444-52. DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e318227b164. PMID: 21753160. PMCID: PMC3146308