← Back
NeuroTrials.ai
Neurology Clinical Trial Database

Perry (NCIC CE.6/EORTC 26062)

Short-Course Radiation plus Temozolomide in Elderly Patients with Glioblastoma

Year of Publication: 2017

Authors: James R. Perry, Normand Laperriere, Christopher J. O'Callaghan, ..., for the Trial Investigators

Journal: New England Journal of Medicine

Citation: N Engl J Med 2017;376:1027-37

Link: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1611977

PDF: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1611977


Clinical Question

In elderly patients (>=65 years) with newly diagnosed glioblastoma, does adding temozolomide to short-course hypofractionated radiotherapy improve overall survival compared with short-course radiotherapy alone?

Bottom Line

Adding temozolomide to short-course radiotherapy (40 Gy/15 fractions) significantly improved overall survival in elderly GBM patients from 7.6 to 9.3 months (HR 0.67, P<0.001) and PFS from 3.9 to 5.3 months (HR 0.50, P<0.001). The benefit was greatest in patients with methylated MGMT (OS 13.5 vs 7.7 months, HR 0.53), establishing short-course RT+TMZ as the standard of care for elderly GBM patients unsuitable for the full Stupp protocol.

Major Points

  • This was the first phase 3 trial to demonstrate a survival benefit from adding temozolomide to short-course hypofractionated radiotherapy in elderly GBM patients — a population excluded from the Stupp trial.
  • 562 patients aged 65-90 (median 73 years) were randomized 1:1 at centers in Europe, Canada, Australia/New Zealand, and Japan.
  • The primary endpoint — overall survival — showed a 33% reduction in the risk of death with RT+TMZ: median 9.3 vs 7.6 months (HR 0.67; 95% CI 0.56-0.80; P<0.001).
  • Progression-free survival was also significantly improved: 5.3 vs 3.9 months (HR 0.50; 95% CI 0.41-0.60; P<0.001).
  • MGMT methylation strongly predicted benefit: methylated patients had median OS of 13.5 months (RT+TMZ) vs 7.7 months (RT alone), HR 0.53 (P<0.001). Unmethylated patients had a smaller, borderline benefit: 10.0 vs 7.9 months, HR 0.75 (P=0.055).
  • Treatment effect was consistent across age subgroups but appeared to increase with age: HR 0.76 for ages 65-70, HR 0.42 for ages 71-75, and HR 0.53 for ages >=76 (P=0.02 for interaction).
  • Quality of life was similar between groups, and there was no clinically meaningful deterioration attributable to chemotherapy.
  • Hematologic toxicity was manageable: grade 3/4 lymphopenia 27.2% vs 10.3%, thrombocytopenia 11.1% vs 0.4%, neutropenia 8.3% vs 0.8%.

Design

Study Type: Randomized, multicenter, open-label, phase 3 trial

Randomization: 1

Blinding: Open-label

Enrollment Period: November 2007 - September 2013

Follow-up Duration: Median 17 months for surviving patients; database locked March 2016

Centers: 0

Countries: Multiple (Canada, Europe, Australia, New Zealand, Japan)

Sample Size: 562

Analysis: Intention-to-treat; stratified log-rank test; Cox regression adjusting for baseline factors; 90% power to detect HR 0.75 at two-sided alpha 0.05


Baseline Characteristics

CharacteristicControlActive

Arms

FieldExperimentalControl
InterventionShort-course RT (40.05 Gy in 15 fractions over 3 weeks) + concurrent TMZ 75 mg/m2/day for 21 consecutive days, then adjuvant TMZ 150-200 mg/m2 days 1-5 of 28-day cycle for up to 12 cyclesShort-course radiotherapy alone: 40.05 Gy in 15 daily fractions over 3 weeks
Duration

Outcomes

OutcomeTypeControlInterventionHR / OR / RRP-value
Overall survival: 9.3 vs 7.6 months; HR 0.67 (95% CI 0.56-0.80); P<0.001Primary0.67P<0.001
PFS: 5.3 vs 3.9 months; HR 0.50 (95% CI 0.41-0.60); P<0.001Secondary0.5P<0.001
Methylated MGMT OS: 13.5 vs 7.7 months; HR 0.53 (95% CI 0.38-0.73); P<0.001Secondary0.53P<0.001
Unmethylated MGMT OS: 10.0 vs 7.9 months; HR 0.75 (95% CI 0.56-1.01); P=0.055Secondary0.75P=0.055
12-month OS: 37.8% vs 22.2%; 18-month OS: 20.0% vs 10.8%; 24-month OS: 10.4% vs 2.8%Secondary
Grade 3/4 lymphopenia: 27.2% vs 10.3%; thrombocytopenia: 11.1% vs 0.4%; neutropenia: 8.3% vs 0.8%Secondary
Quality of life: no significant difference between groupsSecondary

Funding

Canadian Cancer Society Research Institute; EORTC; Trans Tasman Radiation Oncology Group; trial medication supplied by Schering-Plough (now Merck), no role in design or analysis

Based on: Perry (NCIC CE.6/EORTC 26062) (New England Journal of Medicine, 2017)

Authors: James R. Perry, Normand Laperriere, Christopher J. O'Callaghan, ..., for the Trial Investigators

Citation: N Engl J Med 2017;376:1027-37

Content summarized and formatted by NeuroTrials.ai.