APACHE-AF
(2021)Objective
To estimate the rates of non-fatal stroke or vascular death in AF patients who survived anticoagulation-associated ICH when treated with apixaban versus avoiding anticoagulation, to inform design of a larger phase 3 trial
Study Summary
• Very high annual event rate (~12%) in both groups regardless of treatment strategy
• More recurrent ICH with apixaban (8% vs 2%) but similar ischemic stroke rates (12% vs 12%)
Intervention
Apixaban 5mg BID (or 2.5mg BID if dose reduction criteria met) vs avoid anticoagulation (antiplatelet therapy permitted at physician discretion)
Inclusion Criteria
Age ≥18, ICH while on anticoagulation for AF, 7-90 days post-ICH, CHA₂DS₂-VASc ≥2, mRS ≤4
Study Design
Arms: Apixaban vs Avoid anticoagulation (± antiplatelet)
Patients per Arm: 50 vs 51
Outcome
• Recurrent ICH: 8% vs 2% (HR 4.08, NS)
• Ischemic stroke: 12% vs 12% (HR 0.96, NS)
Bottom Line
Patients with AF who had anticoagulation-associated ICH have a very high annual risk of non-fatal stroke or vascular death (~12%) regardless of whether they receive apixaban or avoid anticoagulation. This phase 2 trial was underpowered to detect a treatment difference and underscores the need for larger trials.
Major Points
- Phase 2 trial designed to inform sample size for a larger phase 3 trial
- Specifically enrolled patients who had ICH WHILE ON anticoagulation (anticoagulation-associated ICH)
- No significant difference in primary composite outcome between groups (HR 1.05)
- Very high annual event rates in both groups (~12%) highlight the severity of this clinical situation
- Numerically more recurrent ICH with apixaban (8% vs 2%) but not statistically significant
- Similar rates of ischemic stroke in both groups (12% vs 12%)
- 21% crossover rate in avoid group (11/51 crossed to anticoagulation)
- Trial underpowered; authors estimate 5744 participants per group needed for definitive trial
Study Design
- Study Type
- Randomized, open-label, phase 2 trial with masked endpoint assessment (PROBE design)
- Randomization
- Yes
- Blinding
- Open-label for participants and treating physicians; outcome adjudicators masked to treatment allocation and antithrombotic drug use
- Sample Size
- 101
- Follow-up
- Median 1.9 years (IQR 1.0-3.1); minimum 6 months
- Centers
- 16
- Countries
- Netherlands
Primary Outcome
Definition: Composite of non-fatal stroke (ischemic stroke, ICH, or SAH) or vascular death, whichever came first
| Control | Intervention | HR/OR | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12 (24%); Annual event rate 11.9% (95% CI 6.2-20.8) | 13 (26%); Annual event rate 12.6% (95% CI 6.7-21.5) | 1.05 (0.48-2.31) | 0.90 |
Limitations & Criticisms
- Small sample size (n=101) - phase 2 trial underpowered to detect treatment differences
- Wide 95% confidence intervals preclude definitive conclusions
- Open-label design may introduce reporting, observation, and detection bias
- High crossover rate: 21% (11/51) in avoid group crossed over to anticoagulation
- 9 participants in apixaban group did not start or discontinued treatment
- Blood pressure control during follow-up was suboptimal
- Nearly all participants (99%) were White - limited generalizability to other ethnicities
- Small median ICH volume (5-7 mL) suggests selection of patients who recovered well
- Single country (Netherlands) enrollment only
Citation
Lancet Neurol 2021;20(11):907-916