← Back
NeuroTrials.ai
Neurology Clinical Trial Database

ARISTOTLE

Apixaban versus Warfarin in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation

Year of Publication: 2011

Authors: Granger CB, Alexander JH, McMurray JJV, ..., Hylek EM

Journal: The New England Journal of Medicine

Citation: Granger CB, et al. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(11):981–992.

Link: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1107039

PDF: https://www.nejm.org/doi/pdf/10.1056/NEJMoa1107039


Clinical Question

Does apixaban reduce the risk of stroke or systemic embolism compared to warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation?

Bottom Line

Apixaban was superior to warfarin in preventing stroke/systemic embolism, caused less bleeding, and reduced mortality.

Major Points

  • Largest DOAC vs warfarin trial: 18,201 patients with AF and ≥1 stroke risk factor randomized at 1,034 clinical sites in 39 countries.
  • Triple benefit: apixaban was superior for efficacy (stroke/SE: 1.27% vs 1.60%/yr, HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.66–0.95, P=0.01), superior for safety (major bleeding: 2.13% vs 3.09%/yr, HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.60–0.80, P<0.001), and reduced all-cause mortality (3.52% vs 3.94%/yr, HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.80–0.998, P=0.047).
  • Hemorrhagic stroke reduced by 49% (0.24% vs 0.47%/yr, HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.35–0.75, P<0.001). Ischemic or uncertain type of stroke rates were similar (0.97% vs 1.05%/yr, HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.74–1.13, P=0.42).
  • Dose reduction criteria: apixaban 2.5 mg BID if ≥2 of: age ≥80, weight ≤60 kg, creatinine ≥1.5 mg/dL (~4.7% of patients received the reduced dose).
  • Double-dummy design: patients received either apixaban + warfarin-placebo or warfarin + apixaban-placebo, with sham INR monitoring to maintain blinding.
  • Mean CHADS2 score was 2.1; ~19% had prior stroke/TIA/SE. Median TTR for warfarin arm was 66.0% (mean 62.2%).
  • Paper conclusion: in patients with atrial fibrillation, apixaban was superior to warfarin in preventing stroke or systemic embolism, caused less bleeding, and resulted in lower mortality.

Design

Study Type: Randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, controlled trial

Randomization: 1

Blinding: Double-blind

Enrollment Period: December 2006 – April 2010

Follow-up Duration: Median 1.8 years

Centers: 1034

Number of Countries: 39

Countries: North America, Latin America, Europe, Asian Pacific

Sample Size: 18201

Analysis: Intention-to-treat for efficacy; safety population (received ≥1 dose) for bleeding


Inclusion Criteria

  • Atrial fibrillation or flutter at enrollment, or two or more episodes of atrial fibrillation/flutter documented by electrocardiography at least 2 weeks apart in the 12 months before enrollment.
  • At least one additional risk factor for stroke: age ≥75 years; previous stroke, transient ischemic attack, or systemic embolism; symptomatic heart failure within the previous 3 months or left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40%; diabetes mellitus; or hypertension requiring pharmacologic treatment.
  • No specific CHADS2 score required, but effectively enrolled patients with CHADS2 ≥1.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Atrial fibrillation due to a reversible cause
  • Moderate or severe mitral stenosis
  • Conditions other than atrial fibrillation that required anticoagulation (e.g., a prosthetic heart valve)
  • Stroke within the previous 7 days
  • Need for aspirin at a dose of >165 mg/day or for both aspirin and clopidogrel
  • Severe renal insufficiency (serum creatinine >2.5 mg/dL or calculated CrCl <25 mL/min)

Baseline Characteristics

CharacteristicControlActive
N90819120
Median Age (yr)70 (IQR 63–76)70 (IQR 63–76)
Female (%)35.0%35.5%
Mean CHADS2 Score2.1 ± 1.12.1 ± 1.1
CHADS2 = 1 (%)34.0%34.0%
CHADS2 = 2 (%)35.8%35.8%
CHADS2 ≥3 (%)30.2%30.2%
Prior Stroke/TIA/SE (%)19.7%19.2%
Heart Failure or LVEF ≤40% (%)35.4%35.5%
Hypertension Requiring Treatment (%)87.6%87.3%
Diabetes (%)24.9%25.0%
AF Type - Paroxysmal (%)15.5%15.1%
AF Type - Persistent or Permanent (%)84.4%84.9%
Prior VKA Use >30 consecutive days (%)57.2%57.1%
Median SBP (mmHg)130 (IQR 120–140)130 (IQR 120–140)
Median Weight (kg)82 (IQR 70–95)82 (IQR 70–96)
Aspirin Use at Baseline (%)30.5%31.3%

Arms

FieldApixabanControl
InterventionApixaban 5 mg twice daily. Reduced dose of 2.5 mg twice daily if ≥2 of: age ≥80 years, body weight ≤60 kg, or serum creatinine ≥1.5 mg/dL (~4.7% received reduced dose). Administered with matched warfarin-placebo and sham INR values to maintain blinding (double-dummy design). Concomitant aspirin ≤165 mg/day was permitted.Adjusted-dose warfarin targeting INR 2.0–3.0, with dose titration managed by site investigators using a blinded encrypted point-of-care INR device. Median time in therapeutic range (TTR) was 66.0% (mean 62.2%). Administered with matched apixaban-placebo to maintain double-dummy blinding. Concomitant aspirin ≤165 mg/day was permitted.
DurationMedian 1.8 yearsMedian 1.8 years

Outcomes

OutcomeTypeControlInterventionHR / OR / RRP-value
Stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic) or systemic embolismPrimary1.60%/year (265 events)1.27%/year (212 events)0.790.01 for superiority; <0.001 for noninferiority
Death from any cause (key secondary)Secondary3.94%/year (669 events)3.52%/year (603 events)0.890.047
Stroke, systemic embolism, or death from any causeSecondary5.04%/year (837 events)4.49%/year (752 events)0.890.02
Myocardial infarctionSecondary0.61%/year (102 events)0.53%/year (90 events)0.880.37
Stroke, systemic embolism, MI, or death from any causeSecondary5.49%/year (906 events)4.85%/year (810 events)0.880.01
Pulmonary embolism or deep-vein thrombosisSecondary0.05%/year (9 events)0.04%/year (7 events)0.780.63
Hemorrhagic strokeSecondary0.47%/year (78 events)0.24%/year (40 events)0.51<0.001
Ischemic or uncertain type of strokeSecondary1.05%/year (175 events)0.97%/year (162 events)0.920.42
Safety PopulationAdverseApixaban N: 9088 · Warfarin N: 9052
Major Bleeding (ISTH)Adverse3.09%/year (462 events)2.13%/year (327 events)0.69<0.001
Intracranial HemorrhageAdverse0.80%/year (122 events)0.33%/year (52 events)0.42<0.001
Major or Clinically Relevant Nonmajor BleedingAdverse6.01%/year (877 events)4.07%/year (613 events)0.68<0.001
Any BleedingAdverse25.8%/year (3060 events)18.1%/year (2356 events)0.71<0.001

Subgroup Analysis

Benefits of apixaban consistent across prespecified subgroups: age (<65, 65–74, ≥75), sex, CHADS2 score (1, 2, ≥3), prior stroke/TIA (yes vs no), prior warfarin experience (yes vs no), AF type (paroxysmal vs persistent/permanent), renal function (normal, mild, moderate/severe impairment), region (North America, Latin America, Europe, Asian Pacific), and concomitant aspirin use. For major bleeding, interaction was significant for diabetes status (P=0.003) and renal impairment (P=0.03), with greater bleeding reduction among patients without diabetes and among those with moderate/severe renal impairment.


Criticisms

  • Median follow-up 1.8 years — limited data on very long-term safety and efficacy.
  • Excluded recent stroke (within 7 days) — acute-phase efficacy not directly tested.
  • Excluded severe renal impairment (CrCl <25 mL/min or creatinine >2.5 mg/dL) — safety in dialysis patients unknown.
  • Warfarin arm median TTR was 66% (mean 62%) — reasonable but not optimal. Sites with excellent TTR may see smaller advantage for apixaban.
  • No reversal agent was available during the trial (andexanet alfa approved later in 2018).
  • ~31% of patients used concomitant aspirin — may confound bleeding comparisons.
  • Industry-funded (Bristol-Myers Squibb and Pfizer) — sponsors of apixaban.
  • Ischemic or uncertain type of stroke rates were similar between groups (HR 0.92, P=0.42) — superiority was primarily driven by hemorrhagic stroke reduction.
  • Risk stratification used CHADS2 (range 1–6), not the more contemporary CHA2DS2-VASc score; limited data on patients with very low CHADS2 (score of 1, ~34% of cohort) where treatment benefit may not outweigh bleeding risk.

Funding

Bristol-Myers Squibb and Pfizer

Based on: ARISTOTLE (The New England Journal of Medicine, 2011)

Authors: Granger CB, Alexander JH, McMurray JJV, ..., Hylek EM

Citation: Granger CB, et al. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(11):981–992.

Content summarized and formatted by NeuroTrials.ai.