← Back
NeuroTrials.ai
Neurology Clinical Trial Database

AXIOMATIC-SSP

Safety and efficacy of factor XIa inhibition with milvexian for secondary stroke prevention (AXIOMATIC-SSP): a phase 2, international, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-finding trial

Year of Publication: 2024

Authors: Sharma M, Molina CA, Toyoda K, ..., Czlonkowska A

Journal: Lancet Neurology

Citation: Lancet Neurol. 2024 Jan;23(1):46–59. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(23)00403-9

Link: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ar...ch-api-endpoint


Clinical Question

Does factor XIa inhibition with milvexian reduce ischemic stroke or covert brain infarcts without increasing bleeding risk in patients with acute non-cardioembolic stroke or TIA?

Bottom Line

Milvexian did not demonstrate a clear dose-response benefit for the composite outcome of symptomatic stroke or covert infarcts, but some doses showed a reduction in symptomatic stroke without increasing major bleeding.

Major Points

  • Largest phase 2 trial of FXIa inhibition in non-cardioembolic stroke
  • No dose-response effect for the primary composite outcome
  • Symptomatic stroke was numerically reduced in all but highest dose group
  • No increase in intracranial hemorrhage or fatal bleeding across doses
  • Major GI bleeding slightly higher with doses ≥50 mg BID
  • Findings support moving 25–100 mg BID doses to phase 3 testing

Design

Study Type: Phase 2, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-finding

Randomization: 1

Blinding: Double-blind

Enrollment Period: Jan 2019 – Dec 2021

Follow-up Duration: 90 days

Centers: 367

Countries: Argentina, Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Chile, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Israel, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Norway, Poland, Russia, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, UK, USA, Netherlands, Others

Sample Size: 2366

Analysis: MCP-MOD for dose-response; ITT and per-protocol analyses


Inclusion Criteria

  • Age ≥40 years
  • Non-cardioembolic ischemic stroke (NIHSS ≤7)
  • High-risk TIA (ABCD2 ≥6 or motor deficit)
  • Symptom onset <48 hours
  • Imaging evidence of atherosclerosis

Exclusion Criteria

  • Hemorrhage history or contraindications to anticoagulation
  • eGFR <15 mL/min/1.73m²
  • Active liver disease
  • Need for anticoagulants or strong CYP3A4/P-gp modulators
  • Use of dual antiplatelet therapy >21 days

Baseline Characteristics

CharacteristicComorbiditiesQualifying Event
Hypertension78
Diabetes31
Hyperlipidemia59
Prior Stroke14
TIA924
Smoker52
Minor Stroke76

Arms

FieldControlMilvexian 25 mg once dailyMilvexian 25 mg twice dailyMilvexian 50 mg twice dailyMilvexian 100 mg twice dailyMilvexian 200 mg twice daily
InterventionPlacebo + ASA 100 mg/day + Clopidogrel 75 mg/day (21 days)Milvexian 25 mg QD + standard DAPTMilvexian 25 mg BID + standard DAPTMilvexian 50 mg BID + standard DAPTMilvexian 100 mg BID + standard DAPTMilvexian 200 mg BID + standard DAPT
Duration90 days90 days90 days90 days90 days90 days

Outcomes

OutcomeTypeControlInterventionHR / OR / RRP-value
Composite of symptomatic ischemic stroke or new covert brain infarct by day 90Primary17%14–16% (no dose-response)1.00%NS across all models
Symptomatic stroke: reduced in all but 200 mg BID groupSecondaryPlacebo: 38/691 (5%)25 mg QD: 15/328 (5%) RR 1.26 (0.20-5.73); 25 mg BID: 12/318 (4%) RR 1.30 (0.21-5.92); 50 mg BID: 13/328 (4%) RR 0.84 (0.11-4.26); 100 mg BID: 11/310 (4%) RR 2.23 (0.61-8.12); 200 mg BID: 27/351 (8%) RR 1.57 (0.36-6.51)Doses 25-100 mg BID showed numerically fewer ischaemic strokes than placebo; 200 mg BID had more eventsNot significant (CIs cross 1; no formal hypothesis testing for individual doses)
No difference in covert infarctsSecondaryPlacebo: 66/625 (11%)25 mg QD: 35/308 (11%) RR 0.98 (0.72-1.33); 25 mg BID: 41/287 (14%) RR 1.11 (0.82-1.50); 50 mg BID: 30/306 (10%) RR 0.84 (0.61-1.17); 100 mg BID: 30/277 (11%) RR 0.89 (0.64-1.24); 200 mg BID: 25/317 (8%) RR 0.99 (0.73-1.34)No significant treatment effect across doses
No significant difference in MI or all-cause deathSecondaryPlacebo composite (non-fatal stroke + non-fatal MI + all-cause death): 42/691 (6%); MI 2/691 (<1%); all-cause death 5/691 (1%)Composite: 25 mg QD 17/328 (5%) RR 0.85 (0.49-1.47); 25 mg BID 15/318 (5%) RR 0.78 (0.44-1.38); 50 mg BID 16/328 (5%) RR 0.80 (0.46-1.41); 100 mg BID 16/310 (5%) RR 0.85 (0.49-1.49); 200 mg BID 33/351 (9%) RR 1.55 (1.00-2.40). MI: 1/328, 2/318, 1/328, 2/310, 3/351. All-cause death: 3/328, 3/318, 2/328, 5/310, 4/351No significant differences
Major BleedingAdverse1–2% across groups, no fatal events
Intracranial HemorrhageAdverse<1%
GI BleedingAdverse↑ at ≥50 mg BID doses
Renal EventsAdverse↑ at 200 mg BID

Subgroup Analysis

No significant heterogeneity by age, sex, or qualifying event


Criticisms

  • No dose-response for primary efficacy
  • MRI-detected covert infarcts may not correlate with clinical benefit
  • Potential signal of harm at highest dose (200 mg BID)
  • Study underpowered to detect rare safety signals

Funding

Bristol Myers Squibb and Janssen Research & Development

Based on: AXIOMATIC-SSP (Lancet Neurology, 2024)

Authors: Sharma M, Molina CA, Toyoda K, ..., Czlonkowska A

Citation: Lancet Neurol. 2024 Jan;23(1):46–59. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(23)00403-9

Content summarized and formatted by NeuroTrials.ai.