← Back
NeuroTrials.ai
Neurology Clinical Trial Database

CLARYS

CLinical Assessment of WEB device in Ruptured aneurYSms (CLARYS): results of 1-month and 1-year assessment of rebleeding protection and clinical safety in a multicenter study

Year of Publication: 2022

Authors: Spelle L, Herbreteau D, Caroff J, et al.

Journal: Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery

Citation: Spelle L, et al. J NeuroIntervent Surg 2022;14:807–814.

Link: https://jnis.bmj.com/content/14/8/807


Clinical Question

Is the Woven EndoBridge (WEB) device safe and effective in preventing rebleeding in patients with ruptured bifurcation aneurysms?

Bottom Line

Treatment of ruptured bifurcation aneurysms with the WEB device resulted in 0% rebleeding at 1 month and 1 year, with low device-related complications.

Major Points

  • 0% rebleeding at 1 month and 1 year post-treatment with WEB.
  • 93.3% technical success rate for WEB implantation.
  • WEB-related morbidity and mortality at 1 month and 1 year were 0%.
  • Overall 1-month and 1-year mortality: 1.7% and 3.8%, respectively.
  • Periprocedural complications occurred in 18 patients (30%), mostly thromboembolic and without lasting sequelae.

Design

Study Type: Prospective, multicenter, single-arm study

Randomization:

Enrollment Period: February 2016 – September 2017

Follow-up Duration: 12 months

Centers: 13

Countries: France, Germany

Sample Size: 60

Analysis: Descriptive analysis with core lab adjudication


Arms

FieldWEB Device Group
InterventionWoven EndoBridge (WEB) device implantation for ruptured bifurcation aneurysms
DurationOne-time intervention with 12-month follow-up

Outcomes

OutcomeTypeControlInterventionHR / OR / RRP-value
Rebleeding from target aneurysm within 30 daysPrimary0%
Periprocedural thromboembolic complicationsSecondary16.7%
1-month morbidity (mRS >2)Secondary15.0%
1-year morbidity (mRS >2)Secondary9.6%
16.7%Adverse
3.3%Adverse
6.7%Adverse
1.7%Adverse
8.5%Adverse

Subgroup Analysis

No formal subgroup analysis conducted; complications described by type and timing.


Criticisms

  • Single-arm study without control group
  • Small sample size (n=60)
  • Not randomized
  • Focused only on patients treated with WEB (not all ruptured aneurysms)

Funding

No specific grant. Multiple authors disclosed MicroVention consulting relationships.

Based on: CLARYS (Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery, 2022)

Authors: Spelle L, Herbreteau D, Caroff J, et al.

Citation: Spelle L, et al. J NeuroIntervent Surg 2022;14:807–814.

Content summarized and formatted by NeuroTrials.ai.