← Back
NeuroTrials.ai
Neurology Clinical Trial Database

DAWN

Thrombectomy 6 to 24 Hours after Stroke with a Mismatch between Deficit and Infarct

Year of Publication: 2018

Authors: Nogueira RG, Jadhav AP, Haussen DC, ..., Budzik RF

Journal: New England Journal of Medicine

Citation: N Engl J Med 2018;378:11–21

Link: https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1706442

PDF: https://www.nejm.org/doi/pdf/10.1056/NEJMoa1706442


Clinical Question

Does endovascular thrombectomy provide benefit in patients with acute ischemic stroke 6–24 hours after last known well, with a mismatch between clinical deficit and infarct volume?

Bottom Line

Endovascular thrombectomy plus standard care improved 90-day functional outcomes compared with standard care alone in patients presenting 6–24 hours after stroke onset with a clinical–core mismatch.

Major Points

  • First RCT to show benefit of thrombectomy in the 6–24 hour window using clinical-core mismatch (RAPID automated perfusion software).
  • Used Bayesian adaptive enrichment design with 3 mismatch groups: Group A (age ≥80, NIHSS ≥10, core <21 mL), Group B (age <80, NIHSS ≥10, core <31 mL), Group C (age <80, NIHSS ≥20, core 31–51 mL).
  • Eligible vessels: intracranial ICA or proximal MCA (M1 segment) on CTA or MRA.
  • Trial stopped early for efficacy after 206 of planned 500 patients — posterior probability of superiority exceeded 0.986.
  • Primary outcome (utility-weighted mRS at 90 days): 5.5 vs 3.4 (adjusted difference 2.0, 95% credible interval 1.1–3.0, posterior probability >0.999).
  • Functional independence (mRS 0–2) at 90 days: 49% vs 13% (adjusted difference 33%, 95% credible interval 21–44%, NNT ≈ 2.8).
  • Successful reperfusion (mTICI 2b/3): 84%. Median time from symptom onset to groin puncture: 12.2 hours. Median onset-to-reperfusion: 13.6 hours.
  • No significant increase in sICH (6% vs 3%, P=0.50) or 90-day mortality (19% vs 18%, P=1.00).
  • 53% of patients presented with wake-up stroke — DAWN validated treatment of wake-up strokes using perfusion mismatch selection.
  • Results, together with DEFUSE 3, led to AHA/ASA 2018 guideline update extending thrombectomy window to 24 hours for selected patients.

Design

Study Type: Randomized controlled trial

Randomization: 1

Blinding: Blinded endpoint assessment

Enrollment Period: September 2014 – February 2017

Follow-up Duration: 90 days

Centers: 26

Countries: USA, Canada, Europe, Australia

Sample Size: 206

Analysis: Bayesian adaptive enrichment design with pre-specified interim analysis


Inclusion Criteria

  • Age ≥18 years
  • Last known well 6–24 hours before randomization
  • Pre-stroke mRS 0–1
  • Occlusion of intracranial ICA or M1 MCA on CTA/MRA
  • Mismatch between NIHSS and infarct volume based on RAPID imaging
  • Group A: Age ≥80, NIHSS ≥10, infarct <21 ml
  • Group B: Age <80, NIHSS ≥10, infarct <31 ml
  • Group C: Age <80, NIHSS ≥20, infarct 31–<51 ml

Exclusion Criteria

  • Evidence of intracranial hemorrhage on CT/MRI.
  • Large infarct core exceeding mismatch group thresholds (≥21 mL for Group A, ≥31 mL for Group B, ≥51 mL for Group C).
  • Pre-stroke mRS ≥2 (functional dependence prior to index event).
  • Known life expectancy <6 months.
  • Posterior circulation occlusion (vertebral, basilar, PCA).
  • Isolated M2 or more distal MCA occlusion.
  • Rapidly improving symptoms.
  • Known allergy to contrast dye, nickel, or titanium.
  • Pregnancy.
  • CT or MRI evidence of mass effect with midline shift.
  • Concurrent participation in another interventional trial.

Baseline Characteristics

CharacteristicControlActive
N99107
Age (median, IQR)71 (60–79)69 (59–78)
Female (%)59%62%
Hypertension (%)81%75%
Diabetes (%)24%23%
Atrial Fibrillation (%)43%36%
Prior Stroke or TIA (%)14%9%
NIHSS (median)1717
Ischemic Core Volume (median, mL)7.67.6
Occlusion Site - ICA (%)35%37%
Occlusion Site - M1 MCA (%)65%63%
Wake-Up Stroke (%)55%51%
IV tPA received (%)5%5%
Time from LKW to randomization (median, h)12.512.2

Arms

FieldThrombectomy + Standard CareControl
InterventionMechanical thrombectomy with the Trevo Retriever (Stryker Neurovascular) as the primary device plus guideline-based stroke care including IV tPA if eligible. Thrombectomy performed by neurointerventionalists meeting site qualification criteria. Conscious sedation preferred over general anesthesia. Target: groin puncture within 60 minutes of qualifying imaging. Additional passes and adjunctive techniques (aspiration, balloon angioplasty) were permitted at operator discretion.Guideline-based stroke care per AHA/ASA guidelines without endovascular treatment. Included IV tPA if within window, BP management, antiplatelet/anticoagulation per guidelines, and standard stroke unit care. Rescue thrombectomy was not permitted.
DurationSingle procedure within 24 hours of last known wellNA

Outcomes

OutcomeTypeControlInterventionHR / OR / RRP-value
Utility-weighted modified Rankin Scale at 90 daysPrimary3.45.5<0.001
Secondary13%49%2.8<0.001
Secondary39%77%<0.001
Secondary19%48%<0.001
Symptomatic ICHAdverse3%6%0.50
90-day mortalityAdverse18%19%1.00
Neurological deteriorationAdverse26%14%0.04

Subgroup Analysis

Consistent treatment benefit across all prespecified subgroups: age (<80 vs ≥80), baseline NIHSS (10–19 vs ≥20), occlusion site (ICA vs M1 MCA), time from last known well (6–12h vs 12–24h), ischemic core volume (<21 mL vs 21–51 mL), and mismatch group (A, B, C). The largest absolute benefit was seen in Group C (NIHSS ≥20, core 31–51 mL) but confidence intervals were wide due to small numbers. Wake-up stroke patients (53% of cohort) benefited similarly to witnessed-onset patients. Posterior probability of superiority exceeded 0.97 in all subgroups.


Criticisms

  • Imbalance in baseline atrial fibrillation (43% control vs 36% intervention) may have biased results — AF associated with larger infarcts and worse outcomes.
  • Strict exclusion of large ischemic cores (>51 mL) limits generalizability — later addressed by SELECT2, ANGEL-ASPECT, and RESCUE-Japan LIMIT.
  • RAPID perfusion imaging software required — not universally available, particularly in lower-resource settings.
  • Industry-sponsored (Stryker) — may influence device selection and reporting.
  • Only 5% received IV tPA (due to late presentation) — limited data on combined IV tPA + late-window thrombectomy.
  • Stopped early after 206 of 500 planned patients — may overestimate treatment effect.
  • Bayesian adaptive design is complex and less intuitive than traditional frequentist analysis.
  • Posterior circulation occlusions were excluded — DAWN results cannot be extrapolated to basilar artery occlusion.

Funding

Stryker Neurovascular

Based on: DAWN (New England Journal of Medicine, 2018)

Authors: Nogueira RG, Jadhav AP, Haussen DC, ..., Budzik RF

Citation: N Engl J Med 2018;378:11–21

Content summarized and formatted by NeuroTrials.ai.