← Back
NeuroTrials.ai
Neurology Clinical Trial Database

EDEN

Cerebellar deep brain stimulation for chronic post-stroke motor rehabilitation: a phase I trial

Year of Publication: 2023

Authors: Kenneth B. Baker, Ela B. Plow, Sean Nagel, ..., John Chae & André G. Machado

Journal: Nature Medicine

Citation: Nature Medicine. 2023;29:2366-2374.

Link: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-023-02507-0

PDF: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-023-02507-0.pdf


Clinical Question

To evaluate the safety and feasibility of applying deep brain stimulation (DBS) to the cerebellar dentate nucleus, combined with physical rehabilitation, to promote upper-extremity motor recovery in individuals with chronic (1-3 years) post-stroke impairment.

Bottom Line

Deep brain stimulation of the cerebellar dentate nucleus is safe and feasible in patients with chronic post-stroke upper-extremity impairment. The intervention was associated with significant and clinically meaningful improvements in motor function, especially in patients with some preserved distal function at baseline, and these gains were correlated with cortical reorganization.

Major Points

  • This was a phase I, open-label, non-randomized, single-arm trial involving 12 individuals with chronic (1-3 years post-stroke) moderate-to-severe upper-extremity impairment.
  • All participants were implanted with a DBS device targeting the cerebellar dentate nucleus contralateral to the stroke lesion and underwent a multi-phase rehabilitation protocol.
  • The primary outcome was safety and feasibility. No serious perioperative or stimulation-related adverse events were reported.
  • For secondary outcomes, participants showed a median improvement of 7 points on the Upper-Extremity Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FM-UE) during the 4-8 month DBS + rehabilitation phase (P=0.0005).
  • A post-hoc analysis revealed that the 7 participants with partial preservation of distal motor function at baseline had a much larger median improvement of 15 FM-UE points during the DBS + rehab phase.
  • Functional gains were directly correlated with increased metabolism in the ipsilesional cortex on PET imaging, suggesting treatment-induced neuroplasticity.

Design

Study Type: Open-label, non-randomized, single-arm, phase I trial

Randomization:

Blinding: Open-label

Enrollment Period: June 2016 to August 2020

Follow-up Duration: Long-term follow-up was 10 months after the end of the DBS + rehab phase, with total individual participation spanning 20-24 months.

Centers: 1

Countries: United States

Sample Size: 12

Analysis: Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used to assess changes in secondary outcome scores across different study phases. Linear mixed-effects models were used for PET data analysis. No correction for multiple comparisons was made for secondary outcomes.


Inclusion Criteria

  • First-time, unilateral, ischemic stroke in the middle cerebral artery territory, 12-36 months prior
  • Persistent moderate-to-severe upper-extremity hemiparesis (Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity [FM-UE] score of ≤42)
  • Sufficient upper-extremity motor ability to engage in rehabilitation
  • Transcranial magnetic stimulation-elicited motor evoked potentials in a paretic arm muscle

Exclusion Criteria

  • Excessive spasticity (Modified Ashworth Scale = 4)
  • Severe cognitive impairment (Mini Mental State Examination <24)

Baseline Characteristics

CharacteristicControlActive
GroupOverall Population (n=12)
Age (years, Mean±s.d.)57.4±6.5
Female, n4
Years after stroke (Mean±s.d.)2.2±0.7
Presurgical baseline FM-UE (Total, Mean±s.d.)22.9±6.2

Arms

FieldCerebellar DBS + Rehabilitation
InterventionParticipants underwent a multi-stage protocol: 1) surgical implantation of a DBS lead in the contralesional cerebellar dentate nucleus, 2) a rehab-only baseline period, 3) a DBS programming phase, and 4) a 4- to 8-month DBS + rehabilitation phase with continuous stimulation, followed by a wean and long-term follow-up.
Duration20-24 months

Outcomes

OutcomeTypeControlInterventionHR / OR / RRP-value
Safety as measured by the incidence of serious adverse events during study participation.Primary0 study-related serious adverse events were encountered in 12 participants.
Change in Upper-Extremity Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FM-UE) score during the DBS + rehab phaseSecondaryMedian improvement of 7.0 points (P=0.0005)0.0005
Change in FM-UE score in subgroup with preserved distal motor function (n=7) during DBS + rehab phaseSecondaryMedian improvement of 15.0 points (P=0.007 for difference vs non-preserved group)
Change in Arm Motor Ability Test - Functional Ability (AMAT-FA) score during DBS + rehab phaseSecondaryMedian improvement of 0.34 points (P=0.0010)0.0010
Total adverse eventsAdverse51 events in 12 participants
Treatment-related adverse eventsAdverse21 events in 9 participants (75%)

Subgroup Analysis

A post-hoc analysis showed that participants with preservation of some distal motor function at enrollment (n=7) had significantly larger improvements on the FM-UE (median gain of 15 points) compared to those without (n=5, median gain of 3 points).


Criticisms

  • The study has limitations inherent to a phase I investigation, including an open-label, non-randomized, single-arm design.
  • The small sample size of 12 participants limits statistical power and the ability to generalize findings.
  • It is not possible to distinguish with certainty the effects of rehabilitation alone from the effects of DBS combined with rehabilitation without a randomized control group.
  • The heterogeneity in baseline impairment level across the sample may have influenced results.

Funding

National Institutes of Health (NIH) Brain Research Through Advancing Innovative Neurotechnologies (BRAIN) Initiative; Enspire DBS

Based on: EDEN (Nature Medicine, 2023)

Authors: Kenneth B. Baker, Ela B. Plow, Sean Nagel, ..., John Chae & André G. Machado

Citation: Nature Medicine. 2023;29:2366-2374.

Content summarized and formatted by NeuroTrials.ai.