EXTEND
(2019)Objective
To investigate whether intravenous alteplase between 4.5 and 9.0 hours after stroke onset or on awakening with stroke symptoms results in better outcomes in patients with salvageable brain tissue on perfusion imaging.
Study Summary
• Increased symptomatic ICH: 6.2% vs 0.9% (RR 7.22, P=0.05)
• Secondary ordinal analysis did not show significant functional improvement
• Trial stopped early after 225/310 patients due to loss of equipoise
Intervention
Randomized 1:1 to intravenous alteplase (0.9 mg/kg, max 90mg) or matching placebo between 4.5-9.0 hours after stroke onset or on awakening with stroke symptoms. Patients selected based on perfusion-diffusion mismatch on automated imaging.
Inclusion Criteria
Age ≥18 years, excellent functional status (mRS <2), NIHSS 4-26, hypoperfused but salvageable brain regions on automated perfusion imaging, perfusion-core mismatch ratio >1.2 with absolute difference >10ml and core <70ml
Study Design
Arms: Alteplase 0.9 mg/kg (max 90mg) vs matching placebo
Patients per Arm: Alteplase: 113 patients, Placebo: 112 patients
Outcome
• Symptomatic ICH: 6.2% alteplase vs 0.9% placebo
• 90-day mortality: 11.5% alteplase vs 8.9% placebo (NS)
Bottom Line
Among patients with ischemic stroke and salvageable brain tissue, alteplase between 4.5-9.0 hours resulted in higher percentage with excellent outcome but increased symptomatic hemorrhage risk.
Major Points
- Phase 3 multicenter randomized placebo-controlled trial stopped early at 225/310 patients
- Patients selected based on perfusion-diffusion mismatch on automated imaging
- Primary outcome (mRS 0-1) achieved in 35.4% alteplase vs 29.5% placebo (adjusted RR 1.44, P=0.04)
- Symptomatic ICH significantly higher: 6.2% vs 0.9% (RR 7.22, P=0.05)
- Secondary ordinal analysis did not show significant functional improvement
- 65% of patients awoke with stroke symptoms (unknown onset time)
- Trial terminated due to loss of equipoise after WAKE-UP trial publication
- Door-to-needle time approximately 2 hours (longer than guideline recommendations)
Study Design
- Study Type
- Phase 3, investigator-initiated, multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled trial
- Randomization
- Yes
- Blinding
- Double-blind (patients and investigators)
- Sample Size
- 225
- Follow-up
- 90 days
- Centers
- 28
- Countries
- Australia, New Zealand, Taiwan, Finland
Primary Outcome
Definition: Score of 0 or 1 on modified Rankin scale at 90 days (excellent functional outcome)
| Control | Intervention | HR/OR | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 33/112 (29.5%) | 40/113 (35.4%) | - (Adjusted RR 1.44 (1.01-2.06)) | 0.04 |
Limitations & Criticisms
- Trial terminated early at 73% of planned sample size due to loss of equipoise
- Secondary ordinal analysis did not show significant functional improvement
- Unadjusted analyses did not show significant differences for primary outcome
- Imbalances in baseline covariates (age, stroke severity) favored placebo group
- Door-to-needle time of ~2 hours longer than guideline recommendations
- Majority had large-vessel occlusion but endovascular therapy not widely available during study period
- No adjustment for multiple comparisons in secondary outcomes
- Limited power due to early termination
Citation
N Engl J Med 2019;380:1795-803. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1813046