← Back
NeuroTrials.ai
Neurology Clinical Trial Database

GiACTA Longterm

Long-term effect of tocilizumab in patients with giant cell arteritis: open-label extension phase of the Giant Cell Arteritis Actemra (GiACTA) trial

Year of Publication: 2021

Authors: John H Stone, Jian Han, Martin Aringer, ..., Min Bao; GiACTA investigators

Journal: The Lancet Rheumatology

Citation: Lancet Rheumatol. 2024; PMID: 38279390

Link: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2665-9913(21)00038-2


Clinical Question

What is the durability of tocilizumab effect after discontinuation in giant cell arteritis, and can tocilizumab effectively manage relapses while providing long-term glucocorticoid-sparing benefits?

Bottom Line

42% of patients treated with tocilizumab weekly for one year maintained drug-free remission for two years after stopping treatment. Tocilizumab significantly reduces long-term glucocorticoid exposure and rapidly restores remission in patients who relapse.

Major Points

  • Part two was a 2-year open-label extension following the 1-year randomized controlled part one
  • 215 patients participated in part two; 81 patients from the weekly tocilizumab group were in remission
  • 59 patients who achieved remission on weekly tocilizumab started part two on no treatment
  • 25/59 (42%) maintained tocilizumab-free and glucocorticoid-free remission throughout the 2-year extension
  • 3-year cumulative glucocorticoid dose was approximately halved with weekly tocilizumab vs placebo
  • Tocilizumab-based regimens restored remission in median 15-16 days vs 54 days with glucocorticoids alone
  • No new or unexpected safety signals over 3 years of observation
  • Results support that continuous indefinite immunosuppression is not required for all GCA patients

Design

Study Type: Open-label extension of randomized controlled trial

Randomization:

Blinding: Unblinded in part two; treatment at investigator discretion

Follow-up Duration: 2 years (part two); 3 years total

Countries:

Sample Size: 215

Analysis: van Elteren test for cumulative glucocorticoid comparisons


Inclusion Criteria

  • Completion of part one of GiACTA trial
  • Clinical remission at end of part one (1 year)

Baseline Characteristics

CharacteristicControl (Placebo 26-week taper)Control (Placebo 52-week taper)Tocilizumab WeeklyTocilizumab Every-Other-Week
Sample completing part oneNot specified for part two entryNot specified for part two entryNot specified for part two entry
Patients in remission at year 181
Started part two on no treatment59

Arms

FieldTocilizumab Weekly (Part One)Tocilizumab Every-Other-Week (Part One)ControlControlPart Two (Extension)
InterventionTocilizumab 162 mg subcutaneous once weekly plus 26-week prednisone taperTocilizumab 162 mg subcutaneous every other week plus 26-week prednisone taperPlacebo injections plus 26-week prednisone taperPlacebo injections plus 52-week prednisone taperTreatment at investigator discretion: no treatment, tocilizumab, glucocorticoids, methotrexate, or combinations
Duration1 year1 year1 year1 year2 years

Outcomes

OutcomeTypeControlInterventionHR / OR / RRP-value
Maintenance of clinical remission (absence of relapse) and cumulative glucocorticoid dose over 3 years (exploratory objectives in part two)Primary≤0.001 (TCZ weekly vs placebo); <0.05 (TCZ every-other-week vs placebo)
Drug-free remission maintenance (tocilizumab weekly arm patients starting part two on no treatment)SecondaryN/A25/59 (42%) maintained tocilizumab-free and glucocorticoid-free remission throughout part two
Median time to remission after relapse - Tocilizumab aloneSecondaryN/A15 days (n=17)
Median time to remission after relapse - Tocilizumab plus glucocorticoidsSecondaryN/A16 days (n=36)
Median time to remission after relapse - Glucocorticoids aloneSecondary54 days (n=27)N/A
Overall SafetyAdverseNo new or unexpected findingsNo new or unexpected findings over full 3 years

Subgroup Analysis

Not reported in abstract


Criticisms

  • Open-label design in part two introduces potential bias in treatment decisions and outcome assessment
  • Treatment in part two was at investigator discretion, limiting comparability across groups
  • Exploratory objectives only; not powered for statistical comparisons in extension phase
  • Baseline characteristics for part two entry not fully detailed
  • Selection bias: only patients who completed part one and achieved remission entered extension

Funding

F Hoffmann-La Roche

Based on: GiACTA Longterm (The Lancet Rheumatology, 2021)

Authors: John H Stone, Jian Han, Martin Aringer, ..., Min Bao; GiACTA investigators

Citation: Lancet Rheumatol. 2024; PMID: 38279390

Content summarized and formatted by NeuroTrials.ai.