← Back
NeuroTrials.ai
Neurology Clinical Trial Database

MRGFUS BILATERAL ET

Staged Bilateral Magnetic Resonance-Guided Focused Ultrasound Thalamotomy for Essential Tremor: Prospective Single-Centre Cohort and Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis

Year of Publication: 2026

Authors: F. Paio, G. K. Ricciardi, G. Bulgarelli, ..., S. Tamburin

Journal: European Journal of Neurology

Citation: Paio F, Ricciardi GK, Bulgarelli G, et al. Staged Bilateral Magnetic Resonance-Guided Focused Ultrasound Thalamotomy for Essential Tremor: Prospective Single-Centre Cohort and Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis. Eur J Neurol. 2026;33:e70535.

Link: https://doi.org/10.1111/ene.70535


Clinical Question

Does staged bilateral MRgFUS thalamotomy provide meaningful and sustained tremor reduction — including midline tremor — with an acceptable safety profile in essential tremor patients who previously underwent unilateral treatment?

Bottom Line

Staged bilateral MRgFUS thalamotomy achieved approximately 58% reduction in hand tremor and over 70% improvement in functional disability and QoL at 12 months, with a predominantly mild and transient adverse event profile and preserved cognition, supporting its use as a therapeutic option in carefully selected medication-refractory essential tremor patients who have residual disability after unilateral treatment.

Major Points

  • Staged bilateral MRgFUS (FUS2) produced a 58% reduction in CRST A+B for the treated hand at 12 months (21.0 → 8.8; p<0.001), with effect established by 1 month and sustained throughout follow-up.
  • Midline tremor improved significantly: head tremor reduced 73.8% and voice tremor 40.3% at 12 months — notably, head tremor showed minimal response to FUS1 but significant improvement after FUS2.
  • Functional disability (CRST C) improved 74.2% (7.3 → 1.9) and quality of life (QUEST) improved 68.7% (30.5 → 9.5) at 12 months, with all patients reporting they would undergo the procedure again.
  • The adverse event profile was favorable: 95.2% of 42 AEs were grade 1, 88% were transient. Gait disturbance was most frequent (53.3% at 1 month), resolving completely by 12 months. Only 5 mild AEs persisted at 12 months.
  • Axial function (SARA) showed transient worsening at 1 month (0.5 → 2.1) with near-complete recovery by 12 months (0.7).
  • Cognition was globally preserved at 12 months; a selective, statistically significant decline was observed only in verbal episodic memory (Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test).
  • First-side thalamic lesion maintained durable benefit: 81% CRST A+B improvement at last pre-FUS2 assessment, remaining stable throughout follow-up.
  • Systematic review and random-effects meta-analysis of published bilateral MRgFUS series confirmed significant improvement in tremor severity across cohorts.

Design

Study Type: Prospective single-centre observational cohort study with systematic review and meta-analysis

Randomization:

Blinding: None (open-label observational study)

Allocation: Not applicable (single-arm cohort)

Enrollment Period: November 2023 to March 2025 (FUS2 procedures); FUS1 performed July 2018 to May 2024

Follow-up Duration: 12 months after second-side procedure (FUS2)

Centers: 1

Countries: Italy

Sample Size: 15

Analyzed: 15

Analysis: Linear mixed-effects models with timepoint as fixed effect and subject as random intercept; Bonferroni-adjusted post hoc pairwise comparisons. Neuropsychological outcomes by paired parametric or non-parametric tests. AEs summarized descriptively. Meta-analysis used random-effects models.


Inclusion Criteria

  • Diagnosis of essential tremor
  • Previous first-side MRgFUS thalamotomy (FUS1)
  • Minimum interval of 9 months since first procedure
  • CRST part A score ≥2 in untreated upper limb
  • CRST part C score ≥2 in at least one item
  • Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score ≥18
  • No clinically significant persistent adverse events related to FUS1

Exclusion Criteria

  • Clinically significant persistent adverse events from first-side MRgFUS
  • MoCA score <18
  • General exclusion criteria for MRgFUS thalamotomy (details in supplementary material)

Arms

FieldSecond-side MRgFUS Thalamotomy (FUS2)
N15
InterventionSecond-side magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound thalamotomy using Exablate Neuro 4000 system (Insightec) integrated with 3T MRI (Signa Architect, GE Healthcare). Target set as mirror image of FUS1 lesion, refined by real-time sonication response; definitive lesion placed slightly dorsal to mirrored FUS1 target to minimize AE risk.
DurationSingle procedure with 12-month follow-up

Outcomes

OutcomeTypeControlInterventionHR / OR / RRP-value
Longitudinal change in CRST A+B composite score for the hand treated by FUS2 (all left hands, treated via right thalamic FUS2) from baseline pre-FUS2 to post-FUS2 follow-up timepointsPrimaryNot applicable (single-arm study); baseline pre-FUS2: 21.01 month: 7.1; 6 months: 8.5; 12 months: 8.8<0.001 at all timepoints vs. baseline; no significant differences between post-treatment timepoints
Secondary
Secondary
Secondary
Secondary
Secondary
Secondary
Secondary
Secondary
Secondary
Total AEs: 42 across 15 patientsSafety
Grade 1 (mild): 40/42 (95.2%)Safety
Grade 2: 2/42 (4.8%); all managed conservatively, resolved or improved by 6 monthsSafety
Transient AEs (resolved during follow-up): 88%Safety
Gait disturbance: most frequent AE — grade 1 in 8 patients (53.3%) at 1 month, 3 (20%) at 6 months, 0 at 12 monthsSafety
Persistent AEs at 12 months: 5 mild events — dysarthria, dysgeusia, finger hypoesthesiaSafety
No grade 3 or higher AEs reportedSafety
8/15 (53.3%)Adverse
3/15 (20%)Adverse
0/15 (0%)Adverse
present (mild, grade 1)Adverse
present (mild, grade 1)Adverse
present (mild, grade 1)Adverse
Total AEsAdverse
95.2%Adverse
4.8%Adverse
88%Adverse

Criticisms

  • Small sample size (n=15) limits generalizability and statistical power for subgroup analyses
  • Single-centre observational design without control group precludes causal inference
  • 10-month follow-up data available for only 10 of 15 patients, introducing potential attrition bias
  • Heterogeneous interval between FUS1 and FUS2 (10–69 months) may confound results
  • One patient lacked FUS1 baseline data (performed at another site)
  • Long-term durability beyond 12 months not assessed in this cohort
  • No sham or active comparator arm; natural history of ET progression not accounted for

Based on: MRGFUS BILATERAL ET (European Journal of Neurology, 2026)

Authors: F. Paio, G. K. Ricciardi, G. Bulgarelli, ..., S. Tamburin

Citation: Paio F, Ricciardi GK, Bulgarelli G, et al. Staged Bilateral Magnetic Resonance-Guided Focused Ultrasound Thalamotomy for Essential Tremor: Prospective Single-Centre Cohort and Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis. Eur J Neurol. 2026;33:e70535.

Content summarized and formatted by NeuroTrials.ai.