← Back
NeuroTrials.ai
Neurology Clinical Trial Database

Multi MERCI

Mechanical Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke: Final Results of the Multi MERCI Trial

Year of Publication: 2008

Authors: Wade S. Smith, MD, PhD; Gene Sung, ..., MD; for the Multi MERCI Investigators

Journal: Stroke

Citation: Stroke. 2008;39:1205-1212.

Link: https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1...EAHA.107.497115

PDF: https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1...EAHA.107.497115


Clinical Question

To evaluate if a newer generation mechanical thrombectomy device (L5 Retriever) could improve recanalization rates and to assess the safety of mechanical thrombectomy in patients with acute large vessel occlusion stroke within 8 hours of onset, including those who had persistent occlusion after receiving intravenous tPA.

Bottom Line

The newer generation L5 Retriever was associated with numerically higher rates of recanalization compared to first-generation devices, although the difference was not statistically significant. Successful vascular recanalization, by any method, was strongly associated with improved functional outcomes and lower mortality at 90 days. Performing thrombectomy after IV tPA did not increase complications.

Major Points

  • Multi MERCI was a prospective, single-arm, international, multicenter trial that enrolled 164 patients with large vessel occlusion stroke who were treated within 8 hours of symptom onset.
  • The study included a cohort of patients (29%) who had persistent vessel occlusions after treatment with IV tissue plasminogen activator (tPA).
  • The newer L5 Retriever device achieved successful recanalization (TIMI II or III flow) in 57.3% of cases. The overall final recanalization rate after all interventions (including adjunctive intra-arterial tPA) was 68%.
  • A good clinical outcome (mRS 0-2) at 90 days was achieved in 36% of all patients, and was significantly more likely in patients with successful recanalization (49% vs. 9.6%; P<0.001).
  • Mortality at 90 days was 34% overall, and was significantly lower in patients with successful recanalization (25% vs. 52%; P<0.001).
  • The rate of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage was 9.8%, and the rate of clinically significant procedural complications was 5.5%.

Design

Study Type: International, multicenter, prospective, single-arm trial

Randomization:

Blinding: This was an open-label, single-arm study. Angiographic outcomes were determined by unblinded local investigators. A central core lab reviewed imaging for hemorrhages, which were adjudicated by an independent data safety monitoring board (DSMB).

Enrollment Period: January 2004 to July 2006

Follow-up Duration: 90 days

Centers: 15

Countries: United States, Canada

Sample Size: 164

Analysis: The primary outcome was the recanalization rate with the L5 Retriever device, compared against a prespecified performance goal. Secondary outcomes compared recanalized vs. non-recanalized patients using Fisher exact test.


Inclusion Criteria

  • Age ≥18 years
  • National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score ≥8
  • Stroke symptom onset within 8 hours
  • Angiographically confirmed occlusion of a treatable large vessel (ICA, M1, M2, vertebral, or basilar artery)
  • Included patients who had persistent occlusion after receiving IV tPA

Exclusion Criteria

  • Inability to obtain informed consent
  • Current pregnancy
  • Serum glucose <50 mg/dL
  • Oral anticoagulation with international normalized ratio (INR) >3.0
  • Platelet count <30,000/μL
  • Sustained systolic blood pressure >185 mm Hg or diastolic >110 mm Hg

Baseline Characteristics

CharacteristicControlActive
GroupOverall Population (n=164)
Age, mean±SD, years68.1±16.0
Female, %57
Baseline NIHSS, median (interquartile range)19 (15-23)
IV tPA pretreatment, %29
Site of occlusion - Middle cerebral artery, %60
Symptom onset to groin puncture, median hours (IQR)4.3 (3.2-5.3)

Arms

FieldMechanical Thrombectomy
InterventionMechanical thrombectomy using a Merci Retriever device (X5, X6, or L5). Adjunctive intra-arterial tPA was permitted if device-only thrombectomy failed.
DurationSingle procedure

Outcomes

OutcomeTypeControlInterventionHR / OR / RRP-value
Successful recanalization (TIMI grade II or III flow) of the target vessel after treatment with the L5 Retriever device alone.Primary57.3% (75/131)Met prespecified non-inferiority goal of ≥44%
Favorable outcome (mRS ≤2) at 90 daysSecondary9.6% (Not Recanalized)49% (Recanalized)RR 5.1 (95% CI, 2.2-12)<0.001
Mortality at 90 daysSecondary52% (Not Recanalized)25% (Recanalized)RR 0.48 (95% CI, 0.31-0.73)<0.001
Overall final recanalization rate (all devices and adjunctive therapies)Secondary68% (95% CI, 61-75)
Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhageAdverse9.8% (16/164)
Symptomatic PH-2 hemorrhageAdverse2.4% (4/164)
Clinically significant procedural complicationsAdverse5.5% (9/164)
Device-related serious adverse eventsAdverse2.4%

Subgroup Analysis

There were no significant differences in rates of intracranial hemorrhage or procedural complications between patients who received prior IV tPA and those who did not.


Criticisms

  • The trial was a single-arm study without a contemporaneous control group, making it impossible to definitively conclude that thrombectomy improved outcomes over medical management alone.
  • The angiographic outcomes (recanalization) were interpreted by unblinded site investigators rather than a blinded central core lab, which could introduce bias.
  • The study enrolled a heterogeneous population with no upper limits on age or stroke severity, making direct mortality comparisons with other trials difficult.

Funding

Concentric Medical, Inc.

Based on: Multi MERCI (Stroke, 2008)

Authors: Wade S. Smith, MD, PhD; Gene Sung, ..., MD; for the Multi MERCI Investigators

Citation: Stroke. 2008;39:1205-1212.

Content summarized and formatted by NeuroTrials.ai.