NINDS
(1995)Objective
To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of tPA (0.9mg/kg) within a 3-hour window from stroke onset.
Study Summary
Intervention
tPA administered at 0.9 mg/kg, up to 90 mg, within 3 hours of stroke onset.
Inclusion Criteria
Patients with acute ischemic stroke, treatable within 3 hours of symptoms onset.
Study Design
Arms: alteplase vs. Placebo
Patients per Arm: tPA: 312, Placebo: 312
Outcome
Bottom Line
Intravenous tPA given within 3 hours of ischemic stroke onset significantly improves functional outcomes at 3 months, despite an increased risk of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage.
Major Points
- Landmark two-part trial that led to FDA approval of IV tPA for acute ischemic stroke within 3 hours (June 1996).
- Part 1 (n=291): Tested whether tPA improves NIHSS by ≥4 points or resolves the deficit at 24 hours — primary endpoint not significant (47% tPA vs 39% placebo, RR 1.2, 95% CI 0.9–1.6, P=0.21), favorable trend only.
- Part 2 (n=333, pivotal): Tested 90-day functional outcomes using a global test statistic across 4 scales — significantly favored tPA (global OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.2–2.6, P=0.008).
- Individual 90-day outcomes (Part 2, tPA vs placebo): mRS 0–1: 39% vs 26% (P=0.019); Barthel Index 95–100: 50% vs 38% (P=0.026); Glasgow Outcome Scale 1: 44% vs 32% (P=0.025); NIHSS ≤1: 31% vs 20% (P=0.033).
- Symptomatic ICH within 36 hours: 6.4% (20/312, tPA) vs 0.6% (2/312, placebo), P<0.001. Six additional symptomatic ICHs occurred between 36 hours and 3 months (4 tPA, 2 placebo); 11 total deaths were attributed to intracerebral hemorrhage.
- Mortality at 3 months: 17% (tPA) vs 21% (placebo), not significant (P=0.30). Increased sICH did not translate into excess mortality.
- Benefit was consistent across stroke subtypes (small-vessel, large-vessel, cardioembolic, other) and across time strata — combined global OR 1.9 (95% CI 1.2–2.9) for 0–90 min and 1.9 (95% CI 1.3–2.9) for 91–180 min.
- Any ICH within 36 hours (symptomatic + asymptomatic): 10.9% (34/312, tPA) vs 3.5% (11/312, placebo); asymptomatic ICH rates were similar between groups.
Study Design
- Study Type
- Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (two-part)
- Randomization
- Yes
- Blinding
- Patients, treating physicians, and outcome assessors were blinded
- Sample Size
- 624
- Follow-up
- 3 months
- Centers
- 8
- Countries
- United States
Primary Outcome
Definition: Part 2 (pivotal) primary: global test statistic combining favorable outcomes on 4 scales at 90 days (mRS 0–1, Barthel Index ≥95, Glasgow Outcome Scale 1, NIHSS ≤1). Part 1 primary: improvement of ≥4 points on NIHSS or complete resolution of neurologic deficit at 24 hours.
| Control | Intervention | HR/OR | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Part 2 global test: favorable outcome rates 26–38% across the 4 scales. Part 1 primary (24 h NIHSS improvement): 39% (57/147). | Part 2 global test: favorable outcome rates 31–50% across the 4 scales. Part 1 primary (24 h NIHSS improvement): 47% (67/144). | Part 2 global OR 1.7 (1.2–2.6 (Part 2 global)) | Part 2 global: P=0.008; Part 1 primary (24 h NIHSS): P=0.21 |
Limitations & Criticisms
- 6.4% symptomatic ICH rate — acceptable risk/benefit, but led to initial reluctance in adoption.
- Strict 3-hour window limited generalizability; later trials (ECASS III, IST-3) extended to 4.5 hours.
- Part 1 primary endpoint (24-hour NIHSS improvement) was not significant — only Part 2 (90-day outcomes) was positive.
- Excluded rapidly improving or minor stroke symptoms — debated whether these patients may also benefit (later addressed by PRISMS and TEMPO-2).
- No advanced imaging selection (CTA, CTP, MRI) — all decisions based on non-contrast CT only.
- Small sample size (624) by modern standards, though sufficient for the effect size observed.
- Limited racial diversity — ~65% White, ~27% Black — limited data in Hispanic and Asian populations.
- No vascular imaging required — stroke subtypes classified retrospectively, vessel occlusion status unknown.
- Protocol mandated BP control <185/110 but no standardized antihypertensive protocol across sites.
Citation
N Engl J Med 1995;333:1581–1587