← Back
NeuroTrials.ai
Neurology Clinical Trial Database

OPENS-2

Normobaric hyperoxia combined with endovascular treatment for acute ischaemic stroke in China (OPENS-2 trial): a multicentre, randomised, single-blind, sham-controlled trial

Year of Publication: 2025

Authors: Weili Li, Jing Lan, Ming Wei, ..., Di Li

Journal: The Lancet

Citation: Li W, Lan J, Wei M, et al. Normobaric hyperoxia combined with endovascular treatment for acute ischaemic stroke in China (OPENS-2 trial). Lancet. 2025;405(10477):486-497.

Link: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(24)02809-5


Clinical Question

In patients with acute ischaemic stroke due to anterior-circulation large-vessel occlusion who are candidates for endovascular treatment, does adjunctive normobaric hyperoxia improve 90-day functional outcomes compared with sham hyperoxia?

Bottom Line

Adjunctive normobaric hyperoxia (100% O2 at 10 L/min for 4 h) given alongside endovascular treatment produced a significant favorable shift in 90-day mRS distribution (adjusted common OR 1.65, 95% CI 1.09-2.50; p=0.018) without raising mortality or serious adverse event rates, supporting NBO as a low-cost, widely available adjunctive neuroprotective therapy in anterior-circulation LVO stroke.

Major Points

  • First completed multicentre randomised trial of normobaric hyperoxia plus endovascular treatment in anterior-circulation LVO stroke
  • Significant favorable shift in 90-day mRS distribution with NBO (median mRS 2 vs 3; adjusted common OR 1.65, 95% CI 1.09-2.50; p=0.018)
  • No increase in 90-day mortality (10% vs 12%) or serious adverse events (20% vs 23%) with NBO
  • Intervention is simple, low-cost, and globally deployable: 100% O2 at 10 L/min via non-rebreather mask for 4 hours
  • Trial enrolled exclusively Chinese Han patients; generalizability to other populations needs confirmation
  • Inclusion criteria broadened during the trial to NIHSS 10-20 (from 10-18) due to slow COVID-era recruitment

Design

Study Type: Multicentre, randomised, single-blind, sham-controlled, investigator-initiated trial

Randomization: 1

Blinding: Single-blind: participants and outcome assessors blinded; site investigators and neuro-interventionalists not blinded

Allocation: 1:1 via Interactive Web Response System using minimisation by site, age (<70 vs ≥70), sex, occlusion location (ICA vs MCA), and use of IV thrombolytics

Enrollment Period: April 22, 2021 to February 5, 2023

Follow-up Duration: 90 days

Centers: 26

Countries: China

Sample Size: 282

Analyzed: 282

Analysis: Intention-to-treat for efficacy; safety analysis included all participants who received any oxygen therapy; prespecified per-protocol analysis also performed; missing 90-day mRS imputed with 30-day mRS, otherwise multiple imputation

Power Calculation: Sample of 198 patients projected to provide 90% power to detect a significant shift in mRS distribution at two-sided alpha=0.05, based on OPENS-1 estimates; inflated to 280 to account for losses to follow-up

Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04681651


Inclusion Criteria

  • Age 18-80 years
  • Acute ischaemic stroke due to large-vessel occlusion in internal carotid artery or first segment (M1) of middle cerebral artery
  • Less than one-third of MCA territory involved on CT or MRI
  • Candidate for endovascular treatment
  • Eligible for randomisation within 6 hours of stroke onset
  • Pre-stroke mRS 0 or 1
  • Baseline NIHSS 10-20 (initially 10-18; expanded Feb 8, 2022)
  • ASPECTS ≥6

Exclusion Criteria

  • Active chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
  • Acute respiratory distress syndrome
  • Required more than 3 L/min oxygen to maintain SaO2 >94%
  • Could not cooperate to inhale oxygen with the mask
  • Life expectancy less than 90 days

Baseline Characteristics

Median Age (years): 65 (IQR 57-71)

Female: 75/282 (27%)

Male: 207/282 (73%)

Chinese Han ethnicity: 282/282 (100%)


Arms

FieldNormobaric hyperoxia + endovascular treatmentControl
N140142
Intervention100% oxygen at 10 L/min via non-rebreather mask with reservoir for 4 hours (or FiO2 1.0 if intubated), initiated within 30 min of allocation, plus standard endovascular treatment100% oxygen at 1 L/min via identical non-rebreather mask with bilateral side valves open for 4 hours (or FiO2 0.3 if intubated), plus standard endovascular treatment
Duration4 hours of oxygen therapy4 hours of oxygen therapy

Outcomes

OutcomeTypeControlInterventionHR / OR / RRP-value
Ordinal score on the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 90 days, analysed in the intention-to-treat populationPrimaryMedian mRS 3 (IQR 1-4)Median mRS 2 (IQR 1-4)1.650.018
Infarct volume at 24-48 hours on MRI or CTSecondaryNot reported in source excerpt
Dichotomised 90-day mRS scores (0-1, 0-2, and 4-6)SecondaryNot reported in source excerpt
NIHSS score at 24 h, 72 h, and 7 daysSecondaryNot reported in source excerpt
Early neurological improvement at 24 h (NIHSS reduction ≥4 from baseline)SecondaryNot reported in source excerpt
Successful vessel recanalisation (eTICI 2b, 2c, or 3) on post-procedural angiogramSecondaryNot reported in source excerpt
Recanalisation of occluded vessel at 24-48 h (AOL grade 2 or 3)SecondaryNot reported in source excerpt
Arterial PaO2 at end of oxygen therapySecondaryNot reported in source excerpt
Barthel Index at 90 daysSecondaryNot reported in source excerpt
EQ-5D visual analogue scale at 90 daysSecondaryNot reported in source excerpt
Duration of hospital staySecondaryNot reported in source excerpt
All-cause death at 90 daysSafety17/142 (12%)14/140 (10%)Adjusted risk difference -0.02
Serious adverse events at 90 daysSafety33/142 (23%)28/140 (20%)Adjusted risk difference -0.03
Death (NBO)Adverse14/140 (10%)
Death (Sham)Adverse17/142 (12%)
Serious Adverse Events (NBO)Adverse28/140 (20%)
Serious Adverse Events (Sham)Adverse33/142 (23%)

Subgroup Analysis

Prespecified subgroups by age (<70 vs ≥70), sex, history of atrial fibrillation, IV thrombolysis use, occlusion location (ICA vs MCA), oxygen delivery method (mask vs intubation), baseline ASPECTS (<8 vs ≥8), and stroke subtype (LAA vs cardioembolism vs other); post-hoc subgroups by time from onset to randomisation (0-3 h vs ≥3 h) and smoking status. Detailed results not in the source excerpt.


Criticisms

  • Single-blind design: site investigators and neuro-interventionalists were unblinded to allocation, which could introduce performance bias in procedural management
  • Enrolment limited to Chinese Han patients across 26 Chinese centres, limiting generalizability to other populations and health-care systems
  • Inclusion criteria were broadened mid-trial (NIHSS 10-18 expanded to 10-20) due to COVID-era recruitment delays
  • Sham used 100% O2 at 1 L/min (or FiO2 0.3 if intubated), not true room air, which may not be a fully neutral comparator
  • Narrow eligibility (NIHSS 10-20, ASPECTS ≥6, ≤6 h from onset) limits applicability to patients with milder/more severe deficits, larger cores, or later windows
  • Secondary outcomes were not adjusted for multiple comparisons, precluding definitive conclusions

Funding

Beijing Municipal Education Commission, Beijing Municipal Finance Bureau, and National Natural Science Foundation of China

Based on: OPENS-2 (The Lancet, 2025)

Authors: Weili Li, Jing Lan, Ming Wei, ..., Di Li

Citation: Li W, Lan J, Wei M, et al. Normobaric hyperoxia combined with endovascular treatment for acute ischaemic stroke in China (OPENS-2 trial). Lancet. 2025;405(10477):486-497.

Content summarized and formatted by NeuroTrials.ai.