← Back
NeuroTrials.ai
Neurology Clinical Trial Database

OPTIMAS

Optimal timing of anticoagulation after acute ischaemic stroke with atrial fibrillation (OPTIMAS): a multicentre, blinded-endpoint, phase 4, randomised controlled trial

Year of Publication: 2024

Authors: David J Werring, Hakim-Moulay Dehbi, Norin Ahmed, ..., on behalf of the OPTIMAS investigators*

Journal: Lancet

Citation: Lancet 2024; 404: 1731-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(24)02197-4

Link: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(24)02197-4

PDF: https://www.thelancet.com/action/showPdf...%2824%2902197-4


Clinical Question

To investigate the efficacy and safety of early compared with delayed initiation of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients with acute ischaemic stroke associated with atrial fibrillation.

Bottom Line

Early DOAC initiation within 4 days after ischaemic stroke associated with atrial fibrillation was non-inferior to delayed initiation for the composite outcome of ischaemic stroke, intracranial haemorrhage, unclassifiable stroke, or systemic embolism at 90 days. These findings do not support the current common and guideline-supported practice of delaying DOAC initiation after ischaemic stroke with atrial fibrillation.

Major Points

  • OPTIMAS was a multicentre, open-label, blinded-endpoint, parallel-group, phase 4, randomised controlled trial conducted at 100 UK hospitals.
  • Participants with atrial fibrillation and acute ischaemic stroke were randomised 1:1 to early (≤4 days from stroke symptom onset) or delayed (7-14 days) DOAC initiation.
  • The primary outcome was a composite of recurrent ischaemic stroke, symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage, unclassifiable stroke, or systemic embolism incidence at 90 days.
  • 3621 patients were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis (1814 early group, 1807 delayed group).
  • The primary outcome occurred in 3.3% in both early and delayed DOAC initiation groups (adjusted risk difference [RD] 0.000, 95% CI -0.011 to 0.012).
  • The upper limit of the 95% CI for the adjusted RD was less than the non-inferiority margin of 2 percentage points (Pnon-inferiority=0.0003).
  • Superiority was not identified (Psuperiority=0.96).
  • Symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage occurred in 0.6% in the early group and 0.7% in the delayed group (adjusted RD 0.001, -0.004 to 0.006; p=0.78).
  • The study provides more precise estimates than previous trials, including a broad patient population with moderate-to-severe stroke (14.6% of participants had NIHSS score >10 at randomisation).
  • No evidence of heterogeneity of effect was found across subgroups including stroke severity, reperfusion treatment, or previous anticoagulation.

Design

Study Type: Randomised Controlled Trial

Randomization: 1

Blinding: Blinded-endpoint adjudication by a masked independent external adjudication committee.

Enrollment Period: July 5, 2019, and Jan 31, 2024

Follow-up Duration: 90 days for primary and secondary outcomes

Centers: 100

Countries: UK

Sample Size: 3648

Analysis: Modified intention-to-treat population. Gatekeeper design: sequential testing for non-inferiority (margin 2 percentage points) followed by superiority. Mixed-effects logistic regression for primary outcome, adjusted for stroke severity (NIHSS score) at randomisation, with sites as random intercept terms. Subgroup analyses by fitting an interaction term. Stata 18, R (version 4.4.1), and SAS (version 9.14).


Inclusion Criteria

  • Adults (≥18 years) with atrial fibrillation confirmed by ECG or medical records.
  • Clinical diagnosis of acute ischaemic stroke with symptoms lasting >24 hours.
  • Brain imaging (CT or MRI) to exclude intracranial haemorrhage and non-stroke diagnoses.
  • Eligibility for anticoagulation with a DOAC, with the treating physician uncertain of the optimal timing to start.
  • Ability to be followed up for 90 days after trial entry.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Coagulopathy.
  • Evidence of recent or current anticoagulation with a vitamin K antagonist leading to an INR of 1.7 or higher at randomisation.
  • Clinically significant thrombocytopenia (platelet count <75×10^9 platelets per L).
  • Other coagulopathy or bleeding tendency judged to contraindicate anticoagulation.
  • Severe haemorrhagic transformation of the acute infarct (parenchymal haematoma type 2).
  • Acute intracranial haemorrhage unrelated to the acute infarct.
  • Contraindication to DOAC use (e.g., severe renal impairment [creatinine clearance <15 mL/min], cirrhosis [Child Pugh classification B or C], alanine aminotransferase >2x upper limit of normal, or concurrent medication with a notable DOAC interaction).
  • Known allergy or intolerance to Factor Xa and direct thrombin inhibitor.
  • Definite indication for use of a vitamin K antagonist (e.g., mechanical heart valve).
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding.
  • Brain imaging evidence of non-stroke pathology judged likely to explain clinical presentation.
  • Did not agree to provide consent to study procedures.
  • Any other contraindication to early anticoagulation as judged by the treating clinician.
  • Any other reason that the treating clinician considered would make the patient unsuitable to enter OPTIMAS.

Baseline Characteristics

CharacteristicControlActive
Age, years78.5 (9-9)78.5 (9-9)
Female sex830 (45.9%)810 (44.7%)
Male sex977 (54.1%)1004 (55.3%)
White ethnicity1703 (94.2%)1690 (93.2%)
Black, Black British, Caribbean, or African ethnicity27 (1.5%)31 (1.7%)
South Asian ethnicity30 (1.7%)30 (1.7%)
East Asian or southeast Asian ethnicity17 (0.9%)23 (1.3%)
Mixed ethnicity, other, not disclosed, or missing30 (1.7%)40 (2.2%)
Vitamin K antagonist taken before ischaemic stroke53 (2.9%)61 (3.4%)
DOAC taken before ischaemic stroke584 (32.3%)582 (32.1%)
Antiplatelet agent taken before ischaemic stroke194 (10.7%)213 (11.7%)
Antiplatelet agent taken after ischaemic stroke1546 (85.6%)1489 (82.1%)
DOAC initiated after ischaemic stroke - Apixaban1106 (61.2%)1142 (63.0%)
DOAC initiated after ischaemic stroke - Dabigatran31 (1.7%)38 (2.1%)
DOAC initiated after ischaemic stroke - Edoxaban508 (28.1%)537 (29.6%)
DOAC initiated after ischaemic stroke - Rivaroxaban87 (4.8%)78 (4.3%)
Did not commence DOAC75 (4.2%)19 (1.0%)
Intravenous thrombolysis treatment377 (20.9%)421 (23.2%)
Endovascular treatment135 (7.5%)131 (7.2%)
Hypercholesterolaemia568 (31.4%)620 (34.2%)
Diabetes type 1 or 2, known before ischaemic stroke or diagnosed during admission376 (20.8%)392 (21.6%)
Hypertension1229 (68.0%)1205 (66.4%)
Chronic kidney disease272 (15.1%)271 (14.9%)
Dementia or cognitive impairment127 (7.0%)121 (6.7%)
Current smoker129 (7.1%)144 (7.9%)
Ex-smoker517 (28.6%)502 (27.7%)
Never smoked970 (53.7%)946 (52.1%)
Not known smoking status191 (10.6%)222 (12.2%)
Current alcohol intake >14 units per week189 (10.5%)213 (11.7%)
Myocardial infarction174 (9.6%)162 (8.9%)
Coronary revascularisation120 (6.6%)109 (6.0%)
Congestive heart failure173 (9.6%)210 (11.6%)
History of angina123 (6.8%)139 (7.7%)
Peripheral arterial disease48 (2.7%)30 (1.7%)
Previous ischaemic stroke242 (13.4%)295 (16.3%)
Previous intracranial haemorrhage28 (1.5%)35 (1.9%)
Atrial fibrillation known before ischaemic stroke919 (50.9%)917 (50.6%)

Arms

FieldEarly DOAC Initiation GroupControl
InterventionDirect oral anticoagulant (DOAC) initiation within ≤4 days from stroke symptom onset.Direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) initiation 7-14 days from stroke symptom onset.
Duration90 days90 days

Outcomes

OutcomeTypeControlInterventionHR / OR / RRP-value
Composite of recurrent ischaemic stroke, symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage, unclassifiable stroke, or systemic embolism incidence at 90 days.Primary59 (3.3%)59 (3.3%)0.96
Recurrent ischaemic strokeSecondary42 (2.3%)44 (2.4%)0.84
Symptomatic intracranial haemorrhageSecondary12 (0.7%)11 (0.6%)0.78
Systemic embolismSecondary4 (0.2%)2 (0.1%)0.40
Unclassifiable strokeSecondary2 (0.1%)3 (0.2%)0.66
All-cause mortalitySecondary160 (8.9%)159 (8.8%)0.83
Primary outcome and mortality compositeSecondary190 (10.5%)196 (10.8%)0.88
Major extracranial bleedingSecondary13 (0.7%)7 (0.4%)0.16
Non-major extracranial bleedingSecondary37 (2.0%)45 (2.5%)0.42
All major bleeding (extracranial and intracranial)Secondary25 (1.4%)18 (1.0%)0.24
Venous thromboembolismSecondary10 (0.6%)7 (0.4%)0.46
Acute transfusion reactionsAdverseSimilarSimilar
Prespecified adverse eventsAdverseSimilarSimilar
Unexpected serious adverse eventsAdverseNo unexpected serious adverse events reported.No unexpected serious adverse events reported.

Subgroup Analysis

No heterogeneity was found in any primary or secondary outcomes among prespecified subgroups, including clinical stroke severity (NIHSS score), reperfusion treatment (intravenous thrombolysis, mechanical thrombectomy, or both), and previous anticoagulation. This suggests that early DOAC initiation is safe across these patient groups.


Criticisms

  • Open-label design, which means participants and treating clinicians were not masked to treatment assignment, potentially introducing performance bias (though outcome adjudication was blinded).
  • The study did not randomly assign participants to start anticoagulation between 4 and 7 days after onset, limiting the ability to observe optimal timing within this specific early period.
  • The low number of symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage events limited statistical power for this specific safety outcome.
  • The 95% CI for the primary outcome, while meeting non-inferiority, includes a maximum adjusted risk difference of 1.2 percentage points, which might be considered clinically meaningful by some.
  • The trial excluded patients with severe parenchymal haematoma type 2, limiting definitive guidance for this rare, high-risk subgroup.
  • The study did not centrally adjudicate cardiovascular mortality data.
  • Brain imaging analyses (e.g., infarct volume, haemorrhagic transformation subtypes) will be reported separately, meaning full imaging-related insights are not yet available in this publication.

Funding

British Heart Foundation.

Based on: OPTIMAS (Lancet, 2024)

Authors: David J Werring, Hakim-Moulay Dehbi, Norin Ahmed, ..., on behalf of the OPTIMAS investigators*

Citation: Lancet 2024; 404: 1731-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(24)02197-4

Content summarized and formatted by NeuroTrials.ai.