PREDIMED
(2018)Objective
To test the efficacy of two Mediterranean diets (supplemented with extra-virgin olive oil or nuts) compared with a reduced-fat control diet for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in high-risk individuals
Study Summary
• 5-year absolute risk: 3.6-4.0% (Mediterranean) vs 5.7% (control)
• Benefits primarily driven by stroke reduction (HR 0.58 for combined Mediterranean diets)
Intervention
Mediterranean diet + extra-virgin olive oil (≥4 tbsp/day) or Mediterranean diet + mixed nuts (30g/day) vs reduced-fat diet advice
Inclusion Criteria
Men 55-80 years or women 60-80 years without CVD, with type 2 diabetes OR ≥3 cardiovascular risk factors (smoking, hypertension, elevated LDL, low HDL, overweight/obesity, family history of premature CHD)
Study Design
Arms: Mediterranean diet + EVOO vs Mediterranean diet + nuts vs Control (reduced-fat diet)
Patients per Arm: 2543 EVOO, 2454 nuts, 2450 control
Outcome
• 5-year absolute risk: 3.6% (EVOO), 4.0% (nuts), 5.7% (control)
• Stroke: HR 0.58 (combined Mediterranean diets vs control)
Bottom Line
In persons at high cardiovascular risk, a Mediterranean diet supplemented with extra-virgin olive oil or nuts reduced major cardiovascular events by approximately 30% compared to a reduced-fat diet, with an absolute risk reduction of 1.7-2.1 percentage points over 5 years. Benefits were primarily driven by stroke reduction.
Major Points
- Mediterranean diet with EVOO reduced primary endpoint by 31% (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.53-0.91)
- Mediterranean diet with nuts reduced primary endpoint by 28% (HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.54-0.95)
- 5-year absolute risk: 3.6% (EVOO), 4.0% (nuts), 5.7% (control)
- Stroke was significantly reduced: HR 0.65 (EVOO), HR 0.54 (nuts)
- No significant reduction in MI or all-cause mortality individually
- Per-protocol analysis showed even greater benefit (HR 0.42) with adherence
- Results remained consistent after excluding participants with protocol deviations
- Original 2013 publication was retracted and republished in 2018 after discovering randomization irregularities
- Reanalysis with propensity score adjustment confirmed original findings
Study Design
- Study Type
- Parallel-group, multicenter, randomized controlled trial
- Randomization
- Yes
- Blinding
- Open-label dietary intervention. Endpoint adjudication committee was blinded to group assignments. Protocol deviations identified: 425 household members assigned to same group as enrolled household member; 467 participants at Site D assigned by clinic rather than individually; 593 participants at Site B had inconsistent use of randomization tables.
- Sample Size
- 7447
- Follow-up
- Median 4.8 years (IQR 2.8-5.8 years)
- Centers
- 11
- Countries
- Spain
Primary Outcome
Definition: Composite of myocardial infarction, stroke, and death from cardiovascular causes
| Control | Intervention | HR/OR | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 109 events (4.4%); 11.2 per 1000 person-years; 5-year absolute risk 5.7% (95% CI 4.6-6.9%) | - | - | <0.05 for both comparisons |
Limitations & Criticisms
- Randomization protocol deviations: 425 household members assigned to same group as enrolled member; 467 participants at Site D assigned by clinic not individually; 593 participants at Site B had inconsistent randomization table use
- Original 2013 publication was retracted due to these irregularities; republished in 2018 with propensity score adjustments
- Open-label design - no blinding of dietary intervention
- Higher dropout rate in control group (11.3%) than Mediterranean groups (4.9%)
- Control group received less intensive intervention in first 3 years (yearly contact vs quarterly)
- Spanish population with baseline Mediterranean-style diet may limit generalizability to other populations
- Lower than expected event rates required sample size recalculation and extended follow-up
- Underpowered for individual secondary endpoints (MI, CV death, total mortality)
- Major between-group differences were primarily in supplemental items (EVOO, nuts) rather than overall dietary pattern
- Participants at high CV risk; may not generalize to lower-risk populations
Citation
N Engl J Med 2018;378:e34