← Back
NeuroTrials.ai
Neurology Clinical Trial Database

SWIFT PRIME

Solitaire with the Intention for Thrombectomy as Primary Endovascular Treatment (SWIFT PRIME) trial

Year of Publication: 2015

Authors: Jeffrey L. Saver, M.D., Mayank Goyal, ..., and Reza Jahan

Journal: The New England Journal of Medicine

Citation: N Engl J Med 2015;372:2285-95.

Link: https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1415061


Clinical Question

In patients with acute ischemic stroke due to occlusions in the proximal anterior intracranial circulation, does stent-retriever thrombectomy in addition to intravenous t-PA improve long-term functional outcome compared to intravenous t-PA alone?

Bottom Line

In patients receiving intravenous t-PA for acute ischemic stroke due to proximal anterior intracranial circulation occlusions, thrombectomy with a stent retriever within 6 hours after onset significantly improved functional outcomes at 90 days, without significantly increasing mortality or symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage.

Major Points

  • One of five landmark 2015 thrombectomy RCTs. Unique for being the only trial to require IV tPA in both arms (bridging therapy mandatory) and the only industry-sponsored trial in the group.
  • Stopped early at 196 patients (target 833) after interim analysis showed overwhelming efficacy β€” the largest absolute treatment effect among the 2015 trials.
  • Functional independence (mRS 0–2) at 90 days: 60% thrombectomy vs 35% IV tPA alone (NNT 4, p<0.001) β€” the highest absolute benefit of any 2015 thrombectomy trial.
  • mRS ordinal shift analysis also significant (p<0.001). 0% sICH in the thrombectomy group vs 3% in control β€” the only 2015 trial with lower sICH in the intervention arm.
  • 88% achieved substantial reperfusion (mTICI 2b/3) β€” among the highest rates in the 2015 trials, reflecting experienced operators and Solitaire device efficacy.
  • Imaging criteria evolved mid-trial: initially required target-mismatch perfusion profile (CT perfusion using RAPID software), later changed to small-to-moderate core strategy (ASPECTS-based). Both criteria yielded positive results.
  • Occlusion sites: ICA ~17%, M1 ~72%, M2 ~10%. Solitaire FR or Solitaire 2 was the mandated first-line device.
  • Workflow was fast: median qualifying image to groin puncture 57 min, ED arrival to groin puncture 90 min, onset to first stent retriever deployment 252 min.
  • 24-hour reperfusion on perfusion imaging: 83% thrombectomy vs 40% control (p<0.001). NIHSS improvement at 27h: βˆ’8.5 vs βˆ’3.9 (p<0.001).
  • 90-day mortality: 9% vs 12% (p=0.50) β€” numerically lower in thrombectomy group but not significant.
  • Contributed to the 2015 AHA/ASA Class IA recommendation for thrombectomy in LVO stroke within 6 hours.

Design

Study Type: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial

Randomization: 1

Blinding: Blinded assessment of neurovascular images

Enrollment Period: December 2012 through November 2014

Follow-up Duration: 90 days

Centers: 39

Countries: United States, Europe

Sample Size: 196

Analysis: Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test for primary outcome; dual success criteria with group sequential-analysis plan


Inclusion Criteria

  • Patients with acute ischemic stroke
  • Moderate-to-severe neurologic deficits
  • Imaging-confirmed occlusion of the intracranial internal carotid artery, the first segment of the middle cerebral artery, or both
  • Met imaging eligibility requirements (initially target-mismatch penumbral profile, later small-to-moderate core-infarct strategy)
  • Receiving or had received intravenous t-PA
  • Able to undergo initiation of endovascular treatment within 6 hours after the time that they were last known to be well before the onset of acute stroke symptoms

Exclusion Criteria

  • Large ischemic-core lesion on imaging (ASPECTS <6 or core volume >50 mL on perfusion).
  • Pre-stroke disability (mRS >1).
  • No confirmed proximal anterior circulation occlusion on CTA/MRA.
  • Not receiving or not eligible for IV tPA (all patients required bridging therapy).
  • NIHSS <8 (mild stroke).
  • Posterior circulation occlusion.
  • Known hemorrhagic diathesis or INR >3.0.
  • Platelet count <40,000.
  • Blood glucose <50 mg/dL.
  • Severe allergy to contrast media.
  • Pregnancy or suspected pregnancy.

Arms

FieldControlStent Retriever plus Intravenous t-PA
InterventionIV alteplase 0.9 mg/kg (max 90 mg), 10% bolus over 1 min followed by 90% infusion over 60 min, started within 4.5h of symptom onset. Standard post-tPA care including BP management (<180/105), neurological monitoring, and 24h CT before starting antithrombotics. No endovascular intervention permitted.IV alteplase (same protocol as control) followed by endovascular thrombectomy using Solitaire FR or Solitaire 2 stent retriever within 6 hours of onset. Solitaire was the mandated first-line device; rescue with other FDA-approved devices permitted. Up to 3 passes recommended. General anesthesia or conscious sedation at operator discretion. Balloon guide catheter recommended. Continuous quality improvement program implemented to optimize workflow. Target: qualifying image to groin puncture <60 min.
Duration90 days follow-up90 days follow-up

Outcomes

OutcomeTypeControlInterventionHR / OR / RRP-value
Severity of global disability at 90 days, as assessed by means of the modified Rankin scale (scores 0 [no symptoms] to 6 [death]). Both overall distribution shift and proportion of patients with functional independence (mRS 0-2) were used as simultaneous success criteria.PrimaryMedian mRS: 3 (IQR 2-5)Median mRS: 2 (IQR 1-4)2.6<0.001
Functional independence at 90 days (modified Rankin scale score, ≀2)Secondary33/93 (35%)59/98 (60%)1.7<0.001
Change in NIHSS score at 27 hrSecondary-3.9Β±6.2-8.5Β±7.1<0.001
Death at 90 daysSecondary12/97 (12%)9/98 (9%)0.740.50
Substantial reperfusion immediately after thrombectomy (modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score of 2b or 3)SecondaryNA73/83 (88%)NA
Successful reperfusion at 27 hr (reperfusion of β‰₯90% by perfusion CT or MRI)Secondary21/52 (40%)53/64 (83%)2.05<0.001

Criticisms

  • Mandatory IV tPA in both arms β€” excludes patients ineligible for thrombolysis (late presenters, anticoagulated, recent surgery), limiting generalizability to the direct thrombectomy population.
  • Stopped early at 196/833 patients (24%) β€” the most extreme early termination among the 2015 trials, potentially overestimating treatment effect.
  • Industry-sponsored (Covidien/Medtronic) β€” the only 2015 thrombectomy trial with full industry sponsorship, raising potential conflict of interest concerns.
  • Imaging eligibility changed mid-trial from perfusion-based target mismatch to ASPECTS-based core strategy β€” introduces heterogeneity in patient selection.
  • All sites were tertiary centers with experienced neurointerventionalists and a continuous quality-improvement program β€” workflow times may not be achievable in community settings.
  • Excluded M2 and posterior circulation occlusions β€” later addressed by trials like ASTER 2 and BASICS.
  • Keywords field contains erroneous semaglutide/diabetes terms β€” likely a data entry error from the original trial database.
  • No comparison with aspiration-first technique (ADAPT) β€” only Solitaire stent retriever evaluated.
  • 6-hour time window β€” does not address late-presenting patients, who were later shown to benefit in DAWN and DEFUSE 3.

Subgroup Analysis

No heterogeneity of treatment effect across 8 prespecified subgroups: sex (male OR 1.57, female OR 2.02), age (<65: OR 1.85, β‰₯65: OR 1.55), NIHSS (<17: OR 1.73, β‰₯17: OR 1.67), occlusion site (ICA: OR 2.10, M1: OR 1.61), geographic region (US vs Europe), ASPECTS (≀8: OR 1.79, >8: OR 1.61), tPA given at enrolling vs outside hospital, time from onset to randomization (<3h: OR 1.81, β‰₯3h: OR 1.47). All subgroups showed consistent benefit. Mid-trial imaging protocol change (target mismatch β†’ ASPECTS-based) yielded positive results under both criteria. Trial underpowered (n=196) for formal interaction tests.


Funding

Covidien

Based on: SWIFT PRIME (The New England Journal of Medicine, 2015)

Authors: Jeffrey L. Saver, M.D., Mayank Goyal, ..., and Reza Jahan

Citation: N Engl J Med 2015;372:2285-95.

Content summarized and formatted by NeuroTrials.ai.