ZODIAC
(2025)Objective
To determine superiority of 0° over 30° head positioning at maintaining clinical stability in patients with large vessel occlusion stroke before thrombectomy
Study Summary
• Patients with 30° head positioning had 34.4-fold increased hazard of clinical worsening (≥2 NIHSS points)
• 0° positioning resulted in lower mortality (4.4% vs 21.7%, P=.03)
Intervention
0° versus 30° head positioning with NIHSS monitoring every 10 minutes until thrombectomy
Inclusion Criteria
Adults ≥18 years with CT angiography-positive anterior or posterior LVO, candidates for thrombectomy, baseline mRS 0-1, viable penumbra within 24 hours of stroke onset
Study Design
Arms: 0° head positioning (n=45) vs 30° head positioning (n=47)
Patients per Arm: 45 vs 47
Outcome
• Safety: 1 patient (0°) vs 20 patients (30°) had ≥4 NIHSS point worsening (HR 23.57, P=.002)
• Mortality: 2 patients (0°) vs 10 patients (30°) died within 90 days (P=.03)
Bottom Line
0° head positioning was superior to 30° positioning for maintaining clinical stability in patients with large vessel occlusion stroke before thrombectomy, with significantly lower rates of neurological deterioration and mortality.
Major Points
- Prospective randomized clinical trial with outcome blinding conducted at 12 certified thrombectomy hospitals
- 92 patients randomized to 0° (n=45) or 30° (n=47) head positioning before thrombectomy
- Primary endpoint was early neurological deterioration (≥2 NIHSS points worsening)
- Study was terminated early by DSMB at second interim analysis due to efficacy
- 0° positioning resulted in 34.4-fold lower hazard of clinical worsening compared to 30° positioning
- Safety profile favored 0° positioning with lower severe deterioration and mortality rates
- No patients developed hospital-acquired pneumonia in either group
Study Design
- Study Type
- Prospective randomized clinical trial
- Randomization
- Yes
- Blinding
- Outcome-blinded practitioners collected NIHSS measures; emergency physicians, nurses, residents, and neurointerventionalists were not informed of study enrollment
- Sample Size
- 92
- Follow-up
- 3 months
- Centers
- 12
- Countries
- United States
Primary Outcome
Definition: Early neurological deterioration (NIHSS worsening ≥2 points) before thrombectomy
| Control | Intervention | HR/OR | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 26 patients (30° group) | 1 patient (0° group) | 34.4 (4.65-254.37) | <0.001 |
Limitations & Criticisms
- Small sample size (92 patients) must be considered despite large effect size
- Study and outcome-blinded practitioners collected NIHSS measures because disguising patient head position was impossible
- Clinical improvement may have influenced neurointerventionalist decisions not to treat patients in 0° group
- Patients transferred between facilities were not enrolled due to transport positioning challenges
- Study was terminated early by DSMB, preventing full enrollment of planned 182 patients
Citation
JAMA Neurol. 2025;82(9):905-914. doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2025.2253