← Back
NeuroTrials.ai
Neurology Clinical Trial Database

COBRIT

The Citicoline Brain Injury Treatment (COBRIT) Trial: Design and Methods

Year of Publication: 2009

Authors: Ross Zafonte, William T. Friedewald, Shing M. Lee, ..., Jack Jallo

Journal: Journal of Neurotrauma

Citation: Zafonte R, et al. J Neurotrauma. 2009;26(12):2207–2216. doi:10.1089/neu.2009.1015

Link: https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2009.1015

PDF: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/2824223


Clinical Question

Does 90 days of citicoline (CDP-choline) 2000 mg/day improve global functional and cognitive outcomes in patients with complicated mild, moderate, or severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) when started within 24 hours of injury?

Bottom Line

This is the design and methods paper for COBRIT; efficacy and safety results are not reported here. The trial is powered at 85% (two-sided α=0.05) to detect a global odds ratio of 1.40 across 9 dichotomized neurocognitive and functional outcome measures at 90 days, with 1292 planned enrollees (accounting for ~15% anticipated loss to follow-up). As of July 31, 2009, 800 participants had been enrolled.

Major Points

  • COBRIT is a phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial testing citicoline 1000 mg twice daily (2000 mg/day) vs matched placebo for 90 days in TBI patients enrolled within 24 hours of injury across 8 US clinical centers plus one data coordinating center (TBI-CT Network).
  • Target enrollment: 1292 eligible patients over approximately 32 months (estimated enrollment completion August 2010). As of July 31, 2009, 800 patients had been enrolled, representing 77% of expected enrollment to date and 13% of all patients screened.
  • Among screened patients at time of interim report: 6% were unable to consent and lacked a legally authorized representative, and 6% refused participation.
  • Enrolled severity distribution at time of interim report: severe (GCS 3–8 with motor ≤5) 29%, moderate (GCS 9–12 with motor ≤5) 4%, complicated mild (GCS 13–15 or motor=6) 67%. Planned distribution was 38% severe, 16% moderate, 46% complicated mild.
  • Primary outcome is a global test of 9 dichotomized functional/cognitive measures at 90 days analyzed by global odds ratio using stratified logistic regression. This approach avoids multiple-comparison penalties while capturing TBI's multidimensional impact.
  • Citicoline (CDP-choline) is a naturally occurring intermediate in phosphatidylcholine biosynthesis with dual action: acute neuroprotection (attenuates arachidonic acid/cardiolipin/sphingomyelin release, increases glutathione, reduces reactive oxygen species) and subacute neurorecovery (increases dopamine and acetylcholine levels, enhances cerebral blood flow).
  • Dose rationale: 2000 mg/day was chosen because prior U.S. trials employed 2000 mg as the maximum dosage. Doses as high as 4000 mg/day have been safely used but side effects increase at that level. Animal data used up to 500 mg/kg intraperitoneally (which would grossly exceed recommended human levels).
  • Treatment window: first dose within 24 hours of injury. Rationale: animal and human data suggest a 6–48 hour window; 24-hour window chosen to maximize both neuroprotective and neurorepair opportunities.
  • Power analysis: 1124 participants needed for 85% power (two-sided α=0.05) to detect a global OR of 1.40 (corresponding to an absolute improvement in GOS-E good-outcome rate of 7.7%). With ~15% anticipated loss to follow-up, target enrollment of 1292.
  • Stratification at randomization by: (1) accrual center and (2) TBI severity in 3 strata: GCS 3–5; GCS 6–8 with motor ≤5; GCS ≥9 or GCS 6–8 with motor=6.

Design

Study Type: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter phase III trial

Randomization: 1

Blinding: Double-blind

Enrollment Period: July 2007 - August 2010 (estimated)

Follow-up Duration: 180 days

Centers: 8

Countries: United States

Sample Size: 1292

Analysis: Intent-to-treat; global odds ratio using stratified logistic regression (weighted least squares) across 9 dichotomized outcome measures, stratified by site and initial severity


Inclusion Criteria

  • Non-penetrating traumatic brain injury.
  • Age 18 years (19 in Alabama) to 70 years.
  • GCS criteria — patients OFF paralytics: GCS 3–12 with GCS motor score ≤5 (no CT criteria required); OR GCS 3–12 with GCS motor score=6 AND meeting ANY of the following CT criteria: (a) ≥10 mm total diameter intraparenchymal hemorrhage; (b) acute extra-axial hematoma thickness ≥5 mm; (c) contiguous subarachnoid hemorrhage visible on two or more contiguous CT slices; (d) intraventricular hemorrhage present on two slices; (e) midline shift ≥5 mm.
  • GCS 13–15 meeting the above CT criteria.
  • GCS criteria — patients ON paralytics: GCS 3TP (intubated and paralyzed) meeting the above CT criteria.
  • Reasonable expectation of completing outcome measures at a network center at 6 months post-injury.
  • Able to swallow oral medication, OR if unable to swallow, a gastric tube or PEG is placed by 23 hours after injury.
  • Reasonable expectation of enrollment within the 24-hour time window.
  • English-speaking.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Intubated patients with GCS motor score=6 who do NOT meet CT criteria.
  • Bilaterally fixed and dilated pupils.
  • Positive pregnancy test, known pregnancy, or current breastfeeding.
  • Evidence of pre-existing disease that interferes with outcome assessment.
  • Current use of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors.
  • Current citicoline use and unwilling to discontinue.
  • Imminent death or current life-threatening disease.
  • Current enrollment in another clinical study.
  • Prisoner status.

Baseline Characteristics

Note: Paper reports overall baseline characteristics only (Table 4, 'Baseline Characteristics of Participants as of April 20, 2009'). Per-arm baseline data are not reported in this design/methods paper.

Overall (as of April 20, 2009):

  • Male (n=684): 511 (75%)
  • Caucasian (n=678): 549 (81%)
  • African-American (n=678): 108 (16%)
  • Age 18–30 (n=683): 246 (36%)
  • Age >30–45: 162 (24%)
  • Age >45–60: 185 (27%)
  • Age >60: 90 (13%)
  • GCS 3–8 with GCS motor ≤5 (n=679): 195 (29%)
  • GCS 9–12 with GCS motor ≤5: 26 (4%)
  • GCS 13–15 or GCS Motor =6: 458 (67%)
  • Mechanism — motor vehicle (n=679): 213 (31%)
  • Mechanism — fall from stationary object: 156 (23%)
  • Mechanism — motorcycle/golf cart/ATV: 109 (16%)
  • Mechanism — assault: 66 (10%)

Arms

FieldCiticolineControl
InterventionCiticoline (CDP-choline) 1000 mg twice daily (2000 mg/day) oral or enteral for 90 days, first dose within 24h of injuryMatched placebo tablets twice daily for 90 days, formulated as closely as possible in appearance and taste to the active drug
Duration90 days90 days

Outcomes

OutcomeTypeControlInterventionHR / OR / RRP-value
Global test of 9 dichotomized functional/cognitive measures at 90 days (global odds ratio via stratified logistic regression)PrimaryNot reported (design paper only)Not reported (design paper only)
Rate of recovery of cognitive and functional abilities using the core battery at 30, 90, and 180 daysSecondaryNot reportedNot reported
Effect on disability (DRS), life satisfaction (SWLS), and psychological well-being (BSI) at 30, 90, and 180 daysSecondaryNot reportedNot reported
Treatment differences observed at 90 days after randomization compared to those at 3 months after treatment is discontinued (180 days)SecondaryNot reportedNot reported
Survival after TBI (Kaplan-Meier; stratified log-rank; Cox proportional hazards)SecondaryNot reportedNot reported
Safety profile of citicoline in TBISecondaryNot reportedNot reported
Known side effects (prior trials, qualitative)AdverseIn a large 2001 trial (Clarke et al.), no difference in side effects between placebo and citicoline groupsMild diarrhea, leg edema, and back pain; headache, tinnitus, insomnia, vision problems, and dizziness reported much less frequently

Subgroup Analysis

Stratified at randomization by TBI severity in three strata: (1) GCS 3–5; (2) GCS 6–8 with motor score ≤5; (3) GCS ≥9 or GCS 6–8 with motor=6. Study powered only for overall effect.


Criticisms

  • This publication reports only design and methods — no efficacy or safety results are presented.
  • The enrolled severity distribution at interim report (67% complicated mild, 4% moderate, 29% severe) diverged substantially from the planned distribution (46% complicated mild, 16% moderate, 38% severe), potentially reducing power to detect effects in the more severely injured subgroups.
  • Use of a global composite endpoint across 9 heterogeneous cognitive/functional measures may mask differential effects on individual domains — if citicoline affects only one measure, the global test will not detect efficacy.
  • The assumption that treatment effect is constant across all 9 battery measures (required by the global logit model) may not hold for a drug targeting specific neurotransmitter systems (cholinergic, dopaminergic).
  • Restriction to English-speaking patients limits generalizability to non-English-speaking TBI populations, who may constitute a significant fraction of urban TBI admissions.
  • 24-hour enrollment window is broader than some prior trials (8–12 hours) — earlier administration might be necessary for maximal neuroprotection, and the broad window may dilute effect.
  • Loss to follow-up of 15% was anticipated but not yet observed — actual loss may differ and affect power.
  • No a priori plan to test pharmacogenomic interactions (e.g., APOE-4 status), though DNA banking for future secondary analyses was included.
  • Prior positive trials of citicoline in TBI were small, used lower doses, and showed benefit only on secondary endpoints — the evidentiary basis for expecting efficacy at 2000 mg/day over 90 days in this broad population was modest.

Funding

National Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research (NCMRR), National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD), NIH. Grant numbers: U01HD042823, U01HD042738, U01HD042687, U01HD042736, U01HD042678, U01HD042686, U01HD042653, U01HD042689, U01HD042652.

Based on: COBRIT (Journal of Neurotrauma, 2009)

Authors: Ross Zafonte, William T. Friedewald, Shing M. Lee, ..., Jack Jallo

Citation: Zafonte R, et al. J Neurotrauma. 2009;26(12):2207–2216. doi:10.1089/neu.2009.1015

Content summarized and formatted by NeuroTrials.ai.