Epileptiform Patterns & Normal Variants
The identification and accurate classification of epileptiform discharges on EEG is one of the most important — and most challenging — skills in clinical neurophysiology. Interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs) strongly support the diagnosis of epilepsy in the appropriate clinical context, help classify epilepsy as focal or generalized, and guide treatment decisions. However, several normal EEG variants closely resemble epileptiform activity and can lead to misdiagnosis if not recognized. The International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology (IFCN) has established six criteria for defining IEDs, yet even among experienced electroencephalographers, interrater reliability remains a challenge. This topic reviews the morphology and clinical significance of common epileptiform patterns, their localizing and lateralizing value, and the normal variants that most frequently lead to interpretive error.
Bottom Line
- Interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs) include spikes (<70 ms), sharp waves (70–200 ms), and spike-and-wave complexes; the IFCN requires 4 of 6 criteria for classification, with 5–6 criteria yielding higher specificity
- Focal IEDs localize to one brain region and support focal epilepsy; generalized IEDs have a bihemispheric broad field and support genetic generalized epilepsy (GGE)
- 3 Hz spike-and-wave is the hallmark of childhood absence epilepsy; 4–6 Hz polyspike-and-wave is characteristic of juvenile myoclonic epilepsy
- Temporal intermittent rhythmic delta activity (TIRDA) has diagnostic value equivalent to temporal IEDs for temporal lobe epilepsy and strongly correlates with mesial temporal involvement
- Normal variants — including wicket spikes, BETS, SREDA, 14-and-6 Hz positive bursts, 6 Hz spike-and-wave (phantom spike-and-wave), and rhythmic mid-temporal theta — should not be reported as epileptiform
- IEDs do not diagnose epilepsy alone: They can occur in healthy individuals (rare in adults, slightly more common in children) and in neurologic conditions without epilepsy; clinical context is essential
IFCN Criteria for Interictal Epileptiform Discharges
The IFCN established six criteria to standardize the identification of IEDs and distinguish true epileptiform activity from non-epileptiform sharp transients. These criteria apply to the individual waveform being assessed.
| Criterion | Description |
|---|---|
| 1. Sharp or spiky morphology | Waveform duration of 20–200 ms; rises and falls more steeply than background; spikes are <70 ms and sharp waves are 70–200 ms |
| 2. Different duration than background | The transient stands out from the ongoing background activity by its distinct waveform duration |
| 3. Waveform asymmetry | The ascending and descending limbs differ in slope, creating an asymmetric appearance |
| 4. After-going slow wave | A slow wave following the sharp transient, reflecting the inhibitory surround of the epileptiform discharge |
| 5. Disruption of background | Flattening, or low-voltage alpha/beta activity after (most frequently) or before the transient; indicates local cortical disruption by the discharge |
| 6. Physiologic field distribution | Spatial voltage distribution consistent with a cerebral source; should make anatomic sense as a dipole from a cortical generator |
Applying the IFCN Criteria
- A minimum of 4 of 6 criteria must be satisfied to classify a waveform as an interictal epileptiform discharge
- Meeting 5 or 6 criteria significantly increases specificity compared to the 4-criterion minimum
- Criteria 4 (after-going slow wave) and 5 (background disruption) are independent — both can be present, but either alone fulfills the respective criterion
- When in doubt, consider viewing the discharge in multiple montages (bipolar, referential, Laplacian) to assess the field distribution (criterion 6)
- Digital reformatting capabilities of modern EEG systems allow retrospective montage changes that greatly aid in field analysis
Focal Epileptiform Patterns
Focal IEDs are epileptiform discharges limited to a region of the scalp, consistent with a localized cortical generator. They are the hallmark of focal epilepsy and provide valuable localizing information for treatment planning and surgical evaluation.
Temporal Epileptiform Discharges
- Location: Maximum at anterior temporal electrodes (F7/F8, T1/T2); enhanced by sphenoidal or anterior temporal electrodes
- Morphology: Typically sharp waves with a prominent after-going slow wave and a field involving the anterior temporal and inferior frontal regions
- Clinical significance: The most common focal IED; strongly associated with temporal lobe epilepsy; bilateral independent temporal sharp waves are present in up to 30% of temporal lobe epilepsy patients and may affect surgical planning
- Lateralization value: Unilateral temporal sharp waves concordant with the seizure onset zone are favorable for surgical outcome
Frontal Epileptiform Discharges
- Less commonly detected on surface EEG due to the orientation and depth of many frontal cortical generators
- May show bifrontal predominance or appear generalized due to rapid secondary bilateral synchrony from frontal foci
- Distinguishing focal frontal discharges with secondary bilateral synchrony from true generalized discharges requires careful analysis: a consistent focal lead-in, triggering focal spikes of different morphology, and independent focal spikes all suggest focal origin
Centrotemporal Spikes
- Location: Maximum over central and mid-temporal regions (C3/C4, T3/T4); characteristically have a tangential dipole with frontocentral negativity and frontopolar or inferior frontal positivity
- Activation: Markedly increased during drowsiness and NREM sleep
- Clinical significance: Classic finding in self-limited epilepsy with centrotemporal spikes (SeLECTS, formerly benign rolandic epilepsy); however, centrotemporal spikes on EEG alone do not make this diagnosis — clinical correlation is essential
- Important caveat: Centrotemporal spikes are also found in asymptomatic children (up to 2–5% of school-age children) and may be incidental
Generalized Epileptiform Patterns
Generalized epileptiform discharges have a broad, bihemispheric distribution and are characteristic of genetic generalized epilepsies (GGE). Specific morphologies and frequencies are associated with particular syndromes.
| Pattern | Frequency | Morphology | Associated Syndrome(s) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 Hz spike-and-wave | 2.5–3.5 Hz | Regular, monomorphic spike-and-wave complexes; bilateral, symmetric, frontally predominant; abrupt onset and offset | Childhood absence epilepsy (most characteristic); can also be seen in juvenile absence epilepsy and JME |
| 4–6 Hz polyspike-and-wave | 4–6 Hz | Multiple spikes (polyspikes) followed by a slow wave; often irregular; maximum bifrontocentral | Juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (JME); epilepsy with generalized tonic-clonic seizures alone |
| Slow (<2.5 Hz) spike-and-wave | 1–2.5 Hz | Slow, irregular spike-and-wave complexes; high amplitude; often asymmetric | Lennox-Gastaut syndrome; other developmental and epileptic encephalopathies |
| Generalized paroxysmal fast activity | 10–25 Hz | Brief bursts of fast rhythmic activity, diffuse or bifrontal predominance; primarily during NREM sleep | Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (especially associated with tonic seizures); other epileptic encephalopathies |
| Generalized polyspikes | Variable | Irregular, high-amplitude runs of multiple spikes without organized slow-wave component | JME (during sleep); may be associated with myoclonic seizure types |
| Hypsarrhythmia | Variable (>200 μV) | Disorganized, high-amplitude pattern with multifocal epileptiform discharges; chaotic background | West syndrome (infantile spasms); most apparent during NREM sleep |
Focal Features in Genetic Generalized Epilepsy
- Atypical features occur frequently in patients with idiopathic/genetic generalized epilepsy; focal discharges can be seen in a minority of these patients
- The presence of focal EEG findings does not exclude the diagnosis of GGE; coexistence of focal and generalized features is well-documented
- 3 Hz generalized spike-and-wave complexes, while most characteristic of childhood absence epilepsy, can also be observed in JME and even in some patients with focal onset seizures
- Distinguishing generalized discharges from focal discharges with bifrontal predominance and secondary bilateral synchrony can be extremely difficult in practice
- Findings suggesting focal origin with secondary generalization: consistent focal lead-in, triggering focal spikes with clearly different morphology from the bisynchronous bursts, and independent focal spikes with similar morphology to the triggering spikes
Rhythmic Delta Activity Patterns
Specific patterns of focal or generalized rhythmic delta activity have distinct clinical associations and must be carefully distinguished from epileptiform discharges and from each other.
Temporal Intermittent Rhythmic Delta Activity (TIRDA)
- Morphology: Lateralized rhythmic delta activity (<4 Hz) in the temporal region; may be sinusoidal or sharply contoured
- Diagnostic value: Reported to have diagnostic value similar to temporal IEDs for temporal lobe epilepsy
- Localization: Present in 58% of patients with temporal lobe epilepsy in one series; strongly correlated with mesial temporal structure involvement
- Important nuance: Simultaneous invasive and scalp recording has demonstrated that TIRDA may be associated with slowing of lateral temporal contacts, suggesting it is a marker of neocortical involvement in mesial temporal epilepsy
- Limitations: Can be seen in some patients with generalized epilepsy (e.g., juvenile absence epilepsy) and in healthy individuals older than 90 years
Occipital Intermittent Rhythmic Delta Activity (OIRDA)
- The most common form of focal intermittent rhythmic delta slowing in children
- Classically associated with childhood absence epilepsy but also seen with other seizure types including generalized tonic-clonic seizures and focal seizures
- OIRDA in absence epilepsy tends to be faster in frequency and may contain admixed epileptiform discharges compared to OIRDA in focal epilepsy
- Not specific to epilepsy; can also be present in encephalopathies and other neurologic conditions
Frontal Intermittent Rhythmic Delta Activity (FIRDA)
- A commonly encountered pattern; when present in a limited form, it is considered a normal drowsiness variant in older patients
- Pathologic significance increases with cognitive impairment, neurodegenerative disorders, and if it is persistent, high-amplitude, or asymmetric
- Most suggestive of diffuse encephalopathy due to metabolic, toxic, or structural etiologies; low specificity for epilepsy
- Unilateral FIRDA can be associated with seizures and should be evaluated more carefully
- Has been proposed as a monitoring tool for medication-associated neurotoxicity (e.g., after CAR T-cell infusion)
Normal Variants Mimicking Epileptiform Activity
Several benign EEG patterns closely resemble epileptiform discharges and are common sources of misinterpretation. Misidentifying these normal variants as epileptiform can lead to inappropriate epilepsy diagnosis, unnecessary treatment, and significant psychosocial consequences for patients.
| Normal Variant | Frequency / Duration | Location | Key Distinguishing Features |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wicket spikes (wicket rhythms) | 6–11 Hz; arciform | Temporal regions (T3/T4); bilateral or unilateral | Monophasic (negative), arch-shaped morphology; occur in trains or as single waves; NO after-going slow wave; NO background disruption; commonly seen in drowsiness in adults >30 years |
| BETS (benign epileptiform transients of sleep; small sharp spikes) | Brief (<50 ms); low amplitude (<50 μV) | Temporal; shifting laterality | Occur only in drowsiness/light sleep; low amplitude and brief duration; diphasic; NO after-going slow wave; NO focal slowing; no clinical significance |
| 14-and-6 Hz positive bursts | Alternating 14 Hz and 6 Hz bursts; 0.5–1 s | Posterior temporal; bilateral | Positive polarity (best seen on referential montages); occur in drowsiness/sleep; most common in adolescents; comb-like morphology |
| 6 Hz spike-and-wave (phantom spike-and-wave) | 5–7 Hz; brief bursts (1–2 s) | Diffuse; two forms — FOLD (female, occipital, low amplitude, drowsiness) and WHAM (wake, high amplitude, anterior, male) | Tiny spike component (often barely visible — hence "phantom"); benign FOLD variant is the classic benign form; WHAM variant may warrant more caution; neither form is epileptiform when occurring in isolation |
| SREDA (subclinical rhythmic electrographic discharge of adults) | 5–7 Hz; lasts seconds to minutes | Diffuse or parietal/temporal predominance | Sudden onset of widespread rhythmic theta without clinical correlate; occurs in older adults; does NOT evolve spatially; no post-discharge slowing; benign — often mistaken for electrographic seizure |
| Rhythmic mid-temporal theta of drowsiness (RMTD; previously "psychomotor variant") | 5–7 Hz; rhythmic, notched | Mid-temporal (T3/T4) | Occurs during drowsiness; arciform, sharply contoured theta in runs; does NOT evolve in frequency or distribution; no clinical significance |
| Mu rhythm | 8–13 Hz; arch-shaped | Central (C3/C4) | Attenuates with contralateral movement or thought of movement; NOT affected by eye opening (distinguishes from alpha); can be unilateral and sharply contoured, mimicking central spikes |
| Positive occipital sharp transients of sleep (POSTs) | Sharp transients, 4–5 Hz | Occipital; bilateral (may be asymmetric) | Positive polarity; normal sleep feature (N2); may be sharply contoured and mistaken for occipital spikes when viewed only in bipolar montage |
Avoiding Misdiagnosis: Key Principles
- After-going slow wave: Its presence strongly favors a true epileptiform discharge; its absence should prompt consideration of a normal variant (especially for wicket spikes and BETS)
- Background disruption: True epileptiform discharges typically disrupt the ongoing background; normal variants do not
- State-dependence: Many normal variants are confined to drowsiness or light sleep; this does not make them pathologic, as many true IEDs are also activated by sleep
- Field distribution: View suspicious waveforms in multiple montages; a physiologic field with a clear dipole supports a true epileptiform discharge, while an overly restricted or anatomically implausible field suggests artifact or a benign variant
- Clinical context: A sharply contoured waveform in a patient with no seizure history, normal neuroimaging, and no clinical suspicion for epilepsy has a very low positive predictive value for epilepsy, even if it meets some morphologic criteria
Photoparoxysmal Response
The photoparoxysmal response (PPR) is an abnormal EEG response to intermittent photic stimulation in which epileptiform discharges are provoked by the flashing light. It is distinct from the normal photic driving response and from the benign photomyoclonic response.
Classification
- Grade 1: Spikes limited to the occipital regions, time-locked to the stimulus (occipital spikes)
- Grade 2: Parieto-occipital spikes with biphasic slow wave, time-locked to the stimulus
- Grade 3: Parieto-occipital spikes with biphasic slow wave that is not time-locked — the response outlasts the stimulus
- Grade 4: Generalized spike-and-wave or polyspike-and-wave that extends to anterior regions — the most clinically significant grade
Clinical Significance
- Generalized PPR (Grades 3–4) is a marker of photosensitivity and is most strongly associated with GGE, particularly juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (approximately 30% of JME patients are photosensitive)
- Photosensitivity has a genetic component and is more common in females and in adolescence
- Photosensitive patients should be counseled about potential triggers: flickering lights, television at close range, video games, and sunlight through trees
- Valproic acid is particularly effective at suppressing photosensitivity; lamotrigine and levetiracetam also have efficacy
Epileptiform Discharges in Patients Without Epilepsy
Although epileptiform discharges are strongly associated with epilepsy, they are not pathognomonic. Their presence must be interpreted in clinical context.
- Prevalence in healthy individuals: Rare in adults; slightly more prevalent in children. Studies report IEDs in approximately 0.5–2% of healthy adults and up to 3.5–5% of healthy children
- Neurologic conditions without epilepsy: IEDs have been reported in patients with migraine in childhood, Alzheimer disease, Parkinson disease with visual hallucinations, and Lewy body dementia
- AAN guideline: Discourages routine use of EEG for headache evaluation because of the risk of detecting incidental epileptiform discharges that do not indicate epilepsy
- Clinical principle: An EEG should be ordered when epilepsy is suspected; a finding of an epileptiform discharge must be interpreted in the clinical context of the patient, not in isolation
Triphasic Waves
Triphasic waves deserve special mention as they represent a pattern that can be confused with generalized periodic epileptiform discharges.
- Morphology: Three phases with a prominent positive component; progressively longer phase durations; smooth (blunted) and symmetric morphology
- Distribution: Frontocentral predominance with characteristic fronto-occipital (anterior-to-posterior) time lag
- Typical features: Smooth, symmetric, reactive to stimulation, and located over the frontocentral region
- Classical association: Metabolic encephalopathies, particularly hepatic encephalopathy and uremia
- Atypical features: Sharp morphology, focality, and lack of reactivity increase the concern for an epileptogenic process rather than a purely metabolic etiology
- The ACNS standardized terminology describes these as generalized periodic discharges (GPDs) with triphasic morphology; the distinction between "triphasic waves" and "GPDs" often reflects the interpreter's clinical judgment about whether the pattern is epileptogenic
Summary: Clinical Significance and Pitfalls
| Pitfall | Consequence | Avoidance Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Over-reading normal variants as epileptiform | Inappropriate epilepsy diagnosis; unnecessary ASM treatment; driving restrictions; psychosocial burden | Apply IFCN criteria strictly; look for after-going slow wave and background disruption; use multiple montages; know the normal variant patterns |
| Missing subtle focal IEDs | Missed epilepsy diagnosis; delayed treatment; missed surgical candidacy | Use anterior temporal electrodes (T1/T2); extend recording duration; review in referential montages; ensure adequate sleep recording |
| Mistaking secondary bilateral synchrony for primary generalized discharges | Wrong epilepsy classification; incorrect medication choice (e.g., carbamazepine for presumed GGE) | Look for consistent focal lead-in; compare morphology of triggering spike to bisynchronous discharges; identify independent focal spikes |
| Diagnosing epilepsy from IEDs alone without clinical correlation | False-positive epilepsy diagnosis in patients with incidental IEDs | Epilepsy is a clinical diagnosis; IEDs support but do not prove the diagnosis; consider the pretest probability based on clinical history |
| Reporting SREDA as an electrographic seizure | Unnecessary ICU monitoring, medication escalation, and patient alarm | Recognize the classic features: sudden onset of widespread rhythmic theta without evolution, no clinical correlate, no post-discharge slowing |
References
- Kane N, Acharya J, Beniczky S, et al. A revised glossary of terms most commonly used by clinical electroencephalographers and updated proposal for the report format of the EEG findings. Clin Neurophysiol Pract. 2017;2:170–185.
- Nascimento FA, Beniczky S. Teaching the 6 criteria of the IFCN for defining interictal epileptiform discharges on EEG using a visual graphic. Neurol Educ. 2023;2(2):e200073.
- Kural MA, Duez L, Sejer Hansen V, et al. Criteria for defining interictal epileptiform discharges in EEG. Neurology. 2020;94(20):e2139–e2147.
- Seneviratne U, Hepworth G, Cook M, D'Souza W. Atypical EEG abnormalities in genetic generalized epilepsies. Clin Neurophysiol. 2016;127(1):214–220.
- Reiher J, Beaudry M, Leduc CP. Temporal intermittent rhythmic delta activity (TIRDA) in the diagnosis of complex partial epilepsy. Can J Neurol Sci. 1989;16(4):398–401.
- Di Gennaro G, Quarato PP, Onorati P, et al. Localizing significance of temporal intermittent rhythmic delta activity (TIRDA) in drug-resistant focal epilepsy. Clin Neurophysiol. 2003;114(1):70–78.
- Serafini A, Issa NP, Rose S, et al. TIRDA originating from lateral temporal cortex in a patient with mTLE. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2016;33(6):e34–e38.
- Gelisse P, Serafini A, Velizarova R, Genton P, Crespel A. Temporal intermittent delta activity: a marker of juvenile absence epilepsy? Seizure. 2011;20(1):38–41.
- Riviello JJ, Foley CM. The epileptiform significance of intermittent rhythmic delta activity in childhood. J Child Neurol. 1992;7(2):156–160.
- Watemberg N, Linder I, Dabby R, Blumkin L, Lerman-Sagie T. Clinical correlates of occipital intermittent rhythmic delta activity (OIRDA) in children. Epilepsia. 2007;48(2):330–334.
- Accolla EA, Kaplan PW, Maeder-Ingvar M, Jukopila S, Rossetti AO. Clinical correlates of frontal intermittent rhythmic delta activity (FIRDA). Clin Neurophysiol. 2011;122(1):27–31.
- Huby S, Gelisse P, Tudesq JJ, et al. Frontal intermittent rhythmic delta activity is a useful diagnostic tool of neurotoxicity after CAR T-cell infusion. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflammation. 2023;10(4):e200111.
- Sam MC, So EL. Significance of epileptiform discharges in patients without epilepsy in the community. Epilepsia. 2001;42(10):1273–1278.
- Lam AD, Sarkis RA, Pellerin KR, et al. Association of epileptiform abnormalities and seizures in Alzheimer disease. Neurology. 2020;95(16):e2259–e2270.
- Fernández-Torre JL, Kaplan PW. Atypical or typical triphasic waves — is there a difference? J Clin Neurophysiol. 2021;38(5):384–398.
- Hirsch LJ, Fong MWK, Leitinger M, et al. American Clinical Neurophysiology Society's standardized critical care EEG terminology: 2021 version. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2021;38(1):1–29.
- Cavazzuti GB, Cappella L, Nalin A. Longitudinal study of epileptiform EEG patterns in normal children. Epilepsia. 1980;21(1):43–55.
- Borusiak P, Zilbauer M, Jenke ACW. Prevalence of epileptiform discharges in healthy children — new data from a prospective study using digital EEG. Epilepsia. 2010;51(7):1185–1188.
- Practice parameter: the electroencephalogram in the evaluation of headache. Report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the AAN. Neurology. 1995;45(7):1411–1413.
- Andrade-Machado R, Benjumea Cuartas V, Muhammad IK. Recognition of interictal and ictal discharges on EEG: focal vs generalized epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav. 2021;117:107830.