Chronic Immunosuppression & Biologics
Chronic immunosuppression and biologic therapies form the backbone of long-term management across the spectrum of neuroimmunologic conditions. Maintenance immunotherapy is essential for preventing relapses and stepwise disability accrual in disorders such as NMOSD, MOGAD, autoimmune encephalitis, neurosarcoidosis, and neuropsychiatric SLE. The therapeutic landscape has expanded dramatically over the past decade, with three FDA-approved biologic agents now available for AQP4-positive NMOSD, high-efficacy disease-modifying therapies increasingly favored early in MS, and targeted biologics transforming the management of neurosarcoidosis. This topic provides a comprehensive overview of the oral immunosuppressants, biologic agents, and MS disease-modifying therapies used in neuroimmunology, along with practical guidance on treatment selection, monitoring, and long-term safety considerations.
Bottom Line
- Maintenance immunotherapy prevents relapses and stepwise disability accrual in relapsing neuroimmune conditions — early initiation is critical in most disorders
- Rituximab is the most widely used biologic across neuroimmunologic conditions (NMOSD, MOGAD, autoimmune encephalitis, neurosarcoidosis, CNS vasculitis)
- Three FDA-approved NMOSD therapies: satralizumab (anti-IL-6R), inebilizumab (anti-CD19), and eculizumab (anti-C5) target specific pathogenic mechanisms in AQP4-positive disease
- MS treatment: early high-efficacy therapy is increasingly favored over traditional escalation approaches; MS DMTs are contraindicated in NMOSD
- Treatment selection depends on: underlying condition, antibody category, severity, side effect profile, comorbidities, cost, and patient preferences
- Long-term monitoring for hypogammaglobulinemia, infection risk, and malignancy is essential for all patients on chronic immunosuppression
Oral Immunosuppressants
Conventional oral immunosuppressants remain widely used across neuroimmunologic conditions, particularly in resource-limited settings or as steroid-sparing agents. These medications are generally less expensive than biologics but require longer time to efficacy and carry distinct monitoring requirements. Most require 2–6 months to achieve full therapeutic effect, necessitating bridging therapy with corticosteroids or IVIg during the initiation period.
Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF)
Mycophenolate mofetil selectively depletes guanosine nucleotides preferentially in T and B lymphocytes, inhibiting their proliferation. It is among the most commonly used oral immunosuppressants in neuroimmunology due to its relatively favorable safety profile and broad applicability.
Mycophenolate Mofetil — Key Points
- Mechanism: Inhibits inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH), depleting guanosine nucleotides preferentially in T and B lymphocytes
- Dosing (adults): 1000–3000 mg/day orally, divided twice daily
- Dosing (pediatrics): 600 mg/m² twice daily, maximum 2 g/day
- Time to efficacy: 2–3 months; bridge with corticosteroids or IVIg during initiation
- Indications: NMOSD maintenance, MOGAD relapse prevention, autoimmune encephalitis maintenance, neuropsychiatric SLE, neurosarcoidosis
- Pre-treatment screening: CBC, liver and renal function, pregnancy test (teratogenic — effective contraception required)
- Monitoring: Regular CBC to detect myelosuppression
- Adverse effects: Nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, myelosuppression, hypertension, teratogenicity, increased infection risk, increased malignancy risk
Azathioprine
Azathioprine is a purine synthesis inhibitor that suppresses immune cell proliferation. It has a long track record of use in neuroimmunology, particularly for NMOSD maintenance, though it has largely been supplanted by biologics in settings where these are available.
Azathioprine — Key Points
- Mechanism: Purine synthesis inhibitor suppressing T-cell and B-cell proliferation
- Dosing (adults): 1–3 mg/kg/day orally
- Dosing (pediatrics): 2.5 mg/kg/day (for NMOSD)
- Indications: NMOSD maintenance, MOGAD relapse prevention, neurosarcoidosis, autoimmune encephalitis
- Pre-treatment screening: CBC, liver function, pregnancy screen, TPMT genotype
- Monitoring: Regular CBC, liver function, TPMT levels
- Adverse effects: Nausea, vomiting, myelosuppression, liver toxicity, rash, pancreatitis, increased infection risk, increased malignancy risk (particularly non-melanoma skin cancer, lymphoma)
TPMT Testing Before Azathioprine
- TPMT (thiopurine methyltransferase) genotype must be checked BEFORE starting azathioprine
- TPMT deficiency dramatically increases the risk of severe, potentially fatal myelosuppression
- Homozygous TPMT deficiency (<1% of population): azathioprine is contraindicated
- Heterozygous TPMT deficiency (~10% of population): requires significant dose reduction
- Even with normal TPMT, regular CBC monitoring remains essential
Methotrexate
Methotrexate inhibits dihydrofolate reductase, disrupting folate metabolism and DNA synthesis. In neuroimmunology, its primary role is as a steroid-sparing agent in neurosarcoidosis, where it is increasingly used in combination with infliximab.
Methotrexate — Key Points
- Mechanism: Dihydrofolate reductase inhibitor disrupting folate metabolism and DNA synthesis
- Dosing: 10–25 mg/week orally or subcutaneously
- Primary neuroimmunology indication: Neurosarcoidosis (steroid-sparing agent; commonly combined with infliximab)
- Folic acid supplementation: 1 mg daily is required to reduce toxicity
- Pre-treatment screening: CBC, liver and renal function, pregnancy screen (teratogenic)
- Monitoring: Regular CBC, liver function, renal function, urinalysis
- Additional benefit when combined with infliximab: Reduces formation of anti-infliximab antibodies, thereby maintaining drug efficacy
- Adverse effects: Nausea, vomiting, fatigue, hair loss, elevated liver enzymes, myelosuppression, leukoencephalopathy, teratogenicity, infection risk
Hydroxychloroquine
Hydroxychloroquine is recommended in all patients with SLE. While it does not have specific CNS therapeutic benefit, it reduces overall SLE flare risk and has been associated with improved long-term outcomes including reduced organ damage, reduced thrombotic events, and improved survival. Its role in neuroimmunology is primarily as an adjunctive agent in the management of neuropsychiatric SLE.
Biologic Therapies
Biologic agents target specific immune pathways and have transformed the management of neuroimmunologic conditions. Biologics generally offer greater efficacy than conventional oral immunosuppressants but come with higher cost and specific monitoring requirements. The choice among biologics depends on the underlying condition, pathogenic antibody class, prior treatment response, and practical considerations including route of administration and cost.
Rituximab (Anti-CD20)
Rituximab is a chimeric monoclonal antibody targeting CD20 on B cells, leading to B-cell depletion. It is the most widely used biologic across the spectrum of neuroimmunologic conditions and has the broadest evidence base for efficacy in these disorders. Worldwide, rituximab remains the most commonly prescribed maintenance therapy for NMOSD, where it achieves the lowest annualized relapse rate among conventional immunosuppressants.
Rituximab — Dosing and Monitoring
- Adult dosing: 1000 mg IV × 2 infusions separated by 2 weeks, then repeat every 6 months
- Pediatric dosing: 750 mg/m² × 2 infusions
- Re-dosing strategy in NMOSD: B-cell counts can guide re-dosing intervals — patients relapse with B-cell repopulation; some clinicians monitor CD19+ or CD27+ cells rather than using fixed intervals
- Pre-treatment screening: Hepatitis B (reactivation risk), Hepatitis C, TB (IGRA), quantitative immunoglobulins
- Monitoring: Regular CBC, immunoglobulin levels (IgG, IgM); B-cell counts if using monitoring-based re-dosing
- Duration: Condition-dependent; many patients require indefinite therapy
Rituximab indications across neuroimmunology include:
- NMOSD: Most widely used maintenance therapy; ~60–70% of patients achieve relapse-free status; ~30% have breakthrough relapses prompting a switch to an alternative mechanism
- MOGAD: Used for relapse prevention in patients with relapsing disease
- Autoimmune encephalitis: Maintenance therapy, particularly for refractory or relapsing cases
- Neurosarcoidosis: Alternative biologic, though infliximab is generally preferred
- CNS vasculitis: Used in primary angiitis of the CNS (PACNS) and secondary vasculitis
- IgG4-related disease: Effective for IgG4-related hypertrophic pachymeningitis and other manifestations
- Neuropsychiatric SLE: Option for refractory disease
Rituximab — Hypogammaglobulinemia
- Chronic B-cell depletion can lead to progressive hypogammaglobulinemia, particularly with prolonged use
- Monitor quantitative immunoglobulin levels (IgG, IgM) at regular intervals
- Patients with recurrent infections and low IgG may require immunoglobulin replacement therapy
- Other important adverse effects: infusion reactions, PML (very rare), late-onset neutropenia
Inebilizumab (Anti-CD19)
Inebilizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody targeting CD19, a B-cell surface marker with broader expression than CD20. This is a critical distinction: CD20 is absent on antibody-producing plasmablasts and plasma cells, whereas CD19 is expressed across a wider B-cell lineage spectrum including these antibody-secreting cells. By depleting both conventional B cells and plasmablasts, inebilizumab may more effectively reduce pathogenic antibody production.
- FDA approved: 2020, for AQP4-IgG-positive NMOSD
- Dosing: 300 mg IV on days 1 and 15 (induction), then 300 mg IV every 6 months
- Key trial: N-MOmentum — demonstrated a 77% reduction in NMOSD attacks vs placebo
- Advantage over rituximab: Depletes CD20-negative plasmablasts and plasma cells that continue to produce pathogenic antibodies
- Screening and monitoring: Similar to rituximab — hepatitis B/C, TB, quantitative immunoglobulins
- Adverse effects: Infection risk, hypogammaglobulinemia, infusion reactions
Satralizumab (Anti-IL-6 Receptor)
Satralizumab is a recycling monoclonal antibody that inhibits IL-6 receptor signaling. IL-6 is a key cytokine in NMOSD pathogenesis that promotes plasmablast survival, Th17 differentiation, and antibody production. By blocking IL-6 signaling, satralizumab disrupts these pro-inflammatory cascades without broadly depleting immune cells.
- FDA approved: 2020, for AQP4-IgG-positive NMOSD; also being studied in MOGAD
- Dosing: 120 mg SC at weeks 0, 2, 4 (induction), then every 4 weeks
- Key trials: SAkuraStar (monotherapy) and SAkuraSky (add-on) — both demonstrated significant relapse risk reduction in AQP4-positive patients
- Flexibility: Can be used as monotherapy or with conventional immunosuppressants
- Pediatric data: Limited (8 patients aged 12–18 enrolled in trials)
- Advantages: Subcutaneous administration; favorable safety profile compared to broad immunosuppression
- Adverse effects: URIs, injection site reactions, headache, elevated liver enzymes, hypertension, lipid elevation, neutropenia
Eculizumab (Anti-C5 Complement)
Eculizumab inhibits terminal complement activation by blocking C5 cleavage, preventing formation of the membrane attack complex (MAC). In AQP4-NMOSD, complement-mediated astrocyte injury is a central pathogenic mechanism, making complement inhibition a rational therapeutic target. Eculizumab demonstrated the most robust efficacy of any agent tested in an NMOSD randomized controlled trial.
- FDA approved: 2019, for AQP4-IgG-positive NMOSD (also approved for myasthenia gravis and other complement-mediated conditions)
- Dosing: 900 mg IV weekly × 4 (induction), then 1200 mg at week 5, then 1200 mg every 2 weeks
- Key trial: PREVENT — 94% reduction in relapse risk vs placebo in AQP4-positive NMOSD
- Monitoring: CBC, liver enzymes, watch for signs and symptoms of meningococcal infection
- Adverse effects: Headache, URIs, infusion reactions, meningococcal infection (black box warning)
- Cost: Extremely expensive (~$500,000/year)
Meningococcal Vaccination Before Complement Inhibitors
- Meningococcal vaccination is REQUIRED at least 2 weeks before starting eculizumab or ravulizumab
- Complement inhibition dramatically increases the risk of meningococcal infection (Neisseria meningitidis) — carries a black box warning
- Both MenACWY and MenB vaccines should be administered
- Some guidelines recommend prophylactic antibiotics (penicillin or ciprofloxacin) in addition to vaccination
- Patients must be educated about symptoms of meningococcal infection and instructed to seek immediate medical attention
Ravulizumab (Long-Acting Anti-C5)
Ravulizumab is an extended half-life version of eculizumab that requires administration every 8 weeks instead of every 2 weeks, offering substantially improved convenience with the same mechanism of action. Weight-dependent dosing is used. Ravulizumab is being studied in NMOSD and other complement-mediated conditions and may replace eculizumab as the preferred complement inhibitor due to its more practical dosing schedule. The same meningococcal vaccination requirements apply.
Tocilizumab (Anti-IL-6 Receptor)
Tocilizumab is an IL-6 receptor inhibitor with an overlapping mechanism to satralizumab but different pharmacokinetics. Unlike satralizumab, tocilizumab is not FDA-approved for NMOSD but is used off-label across several neuroimmunologic conditions, particularly in refractory cases.
- Dosing: 4–8 mg/kg IV every 4 weeks, or 162 mg SC every 1–2 weeks
- Off-label indications: NMOSD (especially AQP4-positive), refractory autoimmune encephalitis, fulminant MOGAD, neurosarcoidosis
- Key evidence: Phase 2 TANGO trial demonstrated superiority over azathioprine in preventing AQP4-NMOSD relapses
- Screening: Hepatitis B/C, TB (IGRA)
- Monitoring: CBC, liver enzymes, fasting lipids
- Adverse effects: URIs, injection/infusion reactions, headache, elevated liver enzymes, hypertension, lipid elevations, neutropenia
Infliximab (Anti-TNF-α)
Infliximab is a chimeric monoclonal antibody targeting TNF-α, a key pro-inflammatory cytokine involved in granuloma formation and maintenance. In neuroimmunology, infliximab has emerged as a cornerstone therapy for neurosarcoidosis, where the current trend favors early initiation of infliximab combined with methotrexate as the preferred steroid-sparing approach.
Infliximab in Neurosarcoidosis
- Dosing: 3–5 mg/kg IV at weeks 0, 2, and 6 (induction), then every 4–8 weeks (maintenance)
- Preferred combination: Infliximab + methotrexate — methotrexate both enhances efficacy and prevents formation of anti-infliximab antibodies
- Other indications: Neuro-Behcet disease
- Pre-treatment screening: TB (IGRA), hepatitis B
- Monitoring: Regular CBC
- Adverse effects: Infusion reactions, increased infection risk
TNF-α Inhibitors and Demyelination
- TNF-α inhibitors (infliximab, adalimumab) may increase the risk of demyelination, including new-onset MS-like disease in patients with rheumatoid arthritis
- Do NOT use TNF-α inhibitors for MS or NMOSD
- TNF-α inhibitors are appropriate for neurosarcoidosis and neuro-Behcet disease, where their anti-granulomatous and anti-inflammatory effects outweigh this risk
- If demyelinating symptoms develop during TNF-α inhibitor therapy, discontinue immediately and evaluate for MS or NMOSD
Adalimumab (Anti-TNF-α)
Adalimumab is a fully human anti-TNF-α monoclonal antibody administered as 40 mg SC every 2 weeks. It shares similar indications to infliximab for neurosarcoidosis and can be considered as an alternative, particularly when subcutaneous administration is preferred. The same demyelination warning applies to adalimumab as to infliximab.
MS Disease-Modifying Therapies — Overview
Multiple sclerosis disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) are covered in detail in the dedicated MS topics. This section provides a brief comparative overview for context within the broader immunosuppression landscape. The key principle in current MS treatment is the growing consensus favoring early high-efficacy therapy over traditional escalation approaches, as early aggressive treatment may reduce long-term disability accrual.
| Category | Agents | Efficacy |
|---|---|---|
| Platform therapies | Interferons (IFN-β1a, IFN-β1b), glatiramer acetate | Moderate efficacy; well-established long-term safety |
| Oral therapies | Fingolimod, siponimod, dimethyl fumarate, diroximel fumarate, teriflunomide, cladribine | Moderate to high efficacy depending on agent |
| High-efficacy infusion/injection | Natalizumab (anti-VLA4), ocrelizumab (anti-CD20), ofatumumab (anti-CD20), ublituximab (anti-CD20), alemtuzumab (anti-CD52) | High efficacy; used as first-line or after breakthrough on lower-efficacy agents |
MS DMTs Contraindicated in NMOSD
- MS disease-modifying therapies are contraindicated in NMOSD
- Interferon-beta can exacerbate NMOSD relapses
- Natalizumab is associated with disease exacerbation in NMOSD
- Fingolimod has been reported to worsen NMOSD disease activity
- Accurate differentiation between MS and NMOSD is critical before initiating any disease-modifying therapy
- Always test for AQP4-IgG (and MOG-IgG) before starting MS-specific treatments, particularly in patients with atypical presentations
Comprehensive Drug Comparison
| Drug | Mechanism | Route | Dosing Frequency | Key Screening | Major Adverse Effects | Primary Neuroimmunology Indications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mycophenolate mofetil | IMPDH inhibitor; depletes guanosine nucleotides in lymphocytes | Oral | Twice daily | CBC, liver/renal function, pregnancy | GI symptoms, myelosuppression, teratogenicity, infection risk | NMOSD, MOGAD, autoimmune encephalitis, neuropsychiatric SLE, neurosarcoidosis |
| Azathioprine | Purine synthesis inhibitor | Oral | Daily | CBC, liver function, TPMT genotype, pregnancy | Myelosuppression (TPMT-dependent), liver toxicity, pancreatitis, malignancy risk | NMOSD, MOGAD, neurosarcoidosis, autoimmune encephalitis |
| Methotrexate | Dihydrofolate reductase inhibitor | Oral/SC | Weekly | CBC, liver/renal function, pregnancy | Hepatotoxicity, myelosuppression, teratogenicity, leukoencephalopathy | Neurosarcoidosis (with infliximab) |
| Rituximab | Anti-CD20; B-cell depletion | IV | Every 6 months | Hepatitis B/C, TB (IGRA), immunoglobulins | Infusion reactions, hypogammaglobulinemia, infection risk, PML (rare) | NMOSD, MOGAD, autoimmune encephalitis, neurosarcoidosis, CNS vasculitis, IgG4-RD |
| Inebilizumab | Anti-CD19; B-cell and plasmablast depletion | IV | Every 6 months | Hepatitis B/C, TB, immunoglobulins | Infection risk, hypogammaglobulinemia, infusion reactions | AQP4+ NMOSD (FDA-approved) |
| Satralizumab | Anti-IL-6 receptor (recycling antibody) | SC | Every 4 weeks | Hepatitis B/C, TB, liver function | URIs, injection site reactions, liver enzyme elevation, lipid elevation | AQP4+ NMOSD (FDA-approved) |
| Eculizumab | Anti-C5; terminal complement inhibition | IV | Every 2 weeks | Meningococcal vaccination, CBC | Meningococcal infection (black box), headache, infusion reactions | AQP4+ NMOSD (FDA-approved) |
| Ravulizumab | Anti-C5; extended half-life complement inhibitor | IV | Every 8 weeks | Meningococcal vaccination, CBC | Same as eculizumab | Under study for NMOSD; approved for other complement-mediated diseases |
| Tocilizumab | Anti-IL-6 receptor | IV/SC | Every 4 weeks (IV) or every 1–2 weeks (SC) | Hepatitis B/C, TB, liver function, lipids | Infection risk, liver enzyme elevation, lipid elevation, neutropenia | Refractory NMOSD, refractory autoimmune encephalitis, fulminant MOGAD, neurosarcoidosis |
| Infliximab | Anti-TNF-α | IV | Every 4–8 weeks | TB (IGRA), hepatitis B | Infusion reactions, infection risk, demyelination risk | Neurosarcoidosis, neuro-Behcet disease |
| Adalimumab | Anti-TNF-α | SC | Every 2 weeks | TB (IGRA), hepatitis B | Injection site reactions, infection risk, demyelination risk | Neurosarcoidosis |
Treatment Selection Considerations
Selecting the appropriate maintenance immunotherapy requires careful consideration of multiple disease-specific and patient-specific factors. The following framework guides treatment decisions across neuroimmunologic conditions.
Disease-Specific Treatment Guidelines
- AQP4-positive NMOSD: FDA-approved biologics (satralizumab, inebilizumab, eculizumab) are preferred when accessible; rituximab remains the most widely used agent worldwide; oral immunosuppressants (azathioprine, mycophenolate) are alternatives in resource-limited settings
- MOGAD: Treatment required only for relapsing disease; rituximab, mycophenolate, and azathioprine are most commonly used; satralizumab is under investigation; IVIg may be effective for relapse prevention
- Multiple sclerosis: High-efficacy DMTs (natalizumab, ocrelizumab, ofatumumab, ublituximab, alemtuzumab) increasingly favored early; MS DMTs are contraindicated in NMOSD
- Autoimmune encephalitis: Rituximab is the most commonly used second-line agent for maintenance; mycophenolate and azathioprine are alternatives
- Neurosarcoidosis: Infliximab + methotrexate is the preferred steroid-sparing combination; adalimumab is an alternative anti-TNF-α agent
- CNS vasculitis: Rituximab, cyclophosphamide, or mycophenolate depending on severity and etiology
- Neuropsychiatric SLE: Hydroxychloroquine for all SLE patients; mycophenolate, azathioprine, or rituximab for active CNS disease
Antibody Subclass and Treatment Implications
The IgG subclass of the pathogenic antibody has important implications for treatment selection:
| Feature | IgG1 Disorders | IgG4 Disorders |
|---|---|---|
| Examples | NMDA-R encephalitis, AQP4-NMOSD | LGI1 encephalitis, CASPR2 encephalitis |
| Complement activation | Yes — IgG1 activates classical complement pathway | No — IgG4 does NOT activate complement |
| Complement inhibition | May respond to complement inhibitors (e.g., eculizumab in AQP4-NMOSD) | Complement inhibitors are NOT expected to be effective |
| Pathogenic mechanism | Complement-dependent cytotoxicity, antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity | Direct functional blockade of target antigen |
Practical Considerations
- Cost and access: FDA-approved NMOSD biologics and complement inhibitors are extremely expensive; rituximab and oral immunosuppressants are more widely accessible; insurance coverage and patient assistance programs should be explored
- Route of administration: Subcutaneous agents (satralizumab, adalimumab, ofatumumab) offer convenience over IV infusions; oral agents (mycophenolate, azathioprine, methotrexate) avoid infusion-related logistics entirely
- Family planning: Many immunosuppressants are teratogenic (mycophenolate, azathioprine, methotrexate); pregnancy timing must be coordinated with treatment plans; some biologics (rituximab) require washout periods before conception; satralizumab and eculizumab have limited pregnancy data
- Comorbidities: Hepatitis B reactivation risk with B-cell depleting agents; infection susceptibility with hypogammaglobulinemia; cardiovascular and metabolic risk with chronic corticosteroids
Long-Term Monitoring
All patients on chronic immunosuppression require structured long-term monitoring to detect adverse effects early and maintain safe, effective therapy.
Monitoring Protocol for Chronic Immunosuppression
- CBC with differential: Every 1–3 months initially, then every 3–6 months once stable; detect myelosuppression and cytopenias
- Quantitative immunoglobulins (IgG, IgM, IgA): Every 6–12 months for patients on B-cell depleting therapies; more frequently if recurrent infections; consider IgG replacement if IgG is low and infections recur
- Liver function tests: Baseline and every 3–6 months for methotrexate, azathioprine, mycophenolate, tocilizumab, satralizumab
- Renal function: Baseline and periodically for methotrexate and mycophenolate
- Fasting lipid panel: Baseline and periodically for IL-6 receptor inhibitors (tocilizumab, satralizumab) which can elevate lipids
- Infection surveillance: Annual TB screening for patients on TNF-α inhibitors; hepatitis B monitoring for patients on B-cell depleting agents; promptly evaluate fever and constitutional symptoms
- Malignancy screening: Age-appropriate cancer screening; increased vigilance for non-melanoma skin cancer and lymphoma with azathioprine; annual dermatologic examination recommended
- Vaccination: Update vaccinations before starting immunosuppression when possible; live vaccines are generally contraindicated during immunosuppressive therapy; annual influenza and pneumococcal vaccination recommended
References
- McKeon A, Pittock SJ. Overview and diagnostic approach in autoimmune neurology. Continuum (Minneap Minn). 2024;30(4):960-994.
- Sechi E, Flanagan EP. Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease. Continuum (Minneap Minn). 2024;30(4):1052-1090.
- McCombe JA. Neurologic manifestations of rheumatologic disorders. Continuum (Minneap Minn). 2024;30(4):1189-1225.
- Hacohen Y. Pediatric autoimmune neurologic disorders. Continuum (Minneap Minn). 2024;30(4):1160-1188.