Emerging Therapies in Neuroimmunology
The treatment landscape for neuroimmunologic conditions is evolving rapidly, driven by advances in understanding disease-specific pathogenic mechanisms. Whereas earlier therapeutic strategies relied on broad immunosuppression, current and pipeline agents increasingly target discrete pathways—complement activation, IgG recycling, B-cell subsets, and T-cell costimulation—with the goal of greater efficacy and fewer off-target effects. This topic reviews emerging therapies that are reshaping treatment paradigms across NMOSD, MOGAD, autoimmune encephalitis, multiple sclerosis, and other neuroimmunologic conditions.
Bottom Line
- NMOSD has been transformed by three FDA-approved biologics targeting complement (eculizumab), IL-6R (satralizumab), and CD19 (inebilizumab); new agents targeting FcRn and long-acting complement inhibitors are in development
- MOGAD treatment trials are actively underway (satralizumab, rozanolixizumab); no FDA-approved therapy exists yet for this condition
- Precision medicine approaches target specific pathogenic mechanisms rather than broad immunosuppression, guided by antibody subclass and biomarker profiles
- CAR-T cell therapy and bispecific antibodies represent next-generation approaches for refractory autoimmune diseases, with early results showing dramatic responses in SLE and other conditions
- Biomarker-guided treatment strategies using neurofilament light chain (NfL) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) may allow personalized therapy decisions
- B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-targeted therapies offer potential for conditions driven by antibody-producing long-lived plasma cells that escape conventional B-cell depletion
FcRn Inhibitors
The neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn) plays a critical role in IgG homeostasis by recycling internalized IgG antibodies back to the cell surface, thereby maintaining high serum IgG concentrations and prolonging antibody half-life. Therapeutic FcRn inhibitors block this recycling pathway, accelerating IgG catabolism and reducing pathogenic antibody levels. This mechanism is particularly attractive for antibody-mediated neurologic conditions in which the pathogenic role of specific IgG antibodies is well established.
Rozanolixizumab
Rozanolixizumab is an anti-FcRn humanized monoclonal antibody that received FDA approval for generalized myasthenia gravis (MG) in 2023. It is currently under investigation for MOGAD in a Phase 3 clinical trial. By blocking FcRn, rozanolixizumab accelerates IgG catabolism and reduces pathogenic antibody levels by approximately 50–70%. The drug is administered via subcutaneous infusion.
The rationale for its use in MOGAD is compelling: MOG-IgG is directly pathogenic, and rapid reduction of circulating pathogenic IgG may translate to clinical benefit. Adverse effects include headache, diarrhea, nausea, infections, and hypersensitivity reactions.
Efgartigimod
Efgartigimod is an FcRn antagonist consisting of an engineered Fc fragment. It was the first FcRn inhibitor approved by the FDA, receiving approval for generalized MG in 2021. It is being explored for other antibody-mediated neurologic conditions, including autoimmune encephalitis. Both intravenous and subcutaneous formulations are available.
Efgartigimod reduces total IgG by approximately 70% while selectively sparing IgA, IgM, IgD, and IgE—an important distinction from plasmapheresis, which removes all immunoglobulin classes nonselectively.
Nipocalimab
Nipocalimab is an anti-FcRn monoclonal antibody currently under study for generalized MG and NMOSD. A Phase 3 trial in AQP4-IgG-positive NMOSD is ongoing. If successful, nipocalimab would represent another mechanistically distinct option for NMOSD prevention.
Clinical Relevance of FcRn Inhibitors
- FcRn inhibitors selectively reduce IgG levels without affecting other immunoglobulin classes
- Onset of IgG reduction is rapid (days), making this class potentially useful for acute exacerbations as well as maintenance therapy
- Particularly rational for diseases with well-characterized pathogenic IgG antibodies (MG, NMOSD, MOGAD)
- May be less effective in conditions driven by IgA or IgM antibodies, or by cell-mediated immunity
- Unlike plasmapheresis, FcRn inhibitors can be administered subcutaneously and do not require central venous access
Complement Pathway Inhibitors (Beyond Eculizumab)
Eculizumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting terminal complement component C5, was the first biologic approved for AQP4-IgG-positive NMOSD. Its success validated complement-mediated injury as a therapeutic target. Newer complement inhibitors address limitations of eculizumab, including its biweekly infusion schedule, intravenous-only administration, and incomplete C5 blockade in some patients.
Ravulizumab
Ravulizumab is a long-acting anti-C5 complement inhibitor engineered from eculizumab with an extended half-life. It is FDA approved for paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH), atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS), and generalized MG, and is under investigation for NMOSD.
The key advantage of ravulizumab over eculizumab is its dosing interval: every 8 weeks compared with every 2 weeks for eculizumab. This represents a significant convenience improvement for patients requiring long-term treatment. The meningococcal infection risk remains the same as eculizumab, and vaccination with meningococcal vaccine is required prior to initiation.
Zilucoplan
Zilucoplan is a small peptide C5 inhibitor that received FDA approval for generalized MG in 2023. It is administered subcutaneously as a self-injectable formulation, offering a meaningful practical advantage over intravenous complement inhibitors. Potential applications include AQP4-IgG-positive NMOSD and other complement-mediated neurologic conditions.
Iptacopan
Iptacopan is a Factor B inhibitor that targets the alternative complement pathway upstream of C5. It is under investigation for various complement-mediated conditions. The potential advantage of targeting the alternative pathway at an earlier step is more selective complement inhibition, potentially preserving some protective complement functions while blocking the pathogenic cascade.
Aquaporumab
Aquaporumab represents a conceptually innovative approach: a non-pathogenic AQP4 antibody engineered to competitively block pathogenic AQP4-IgG binding to its target on astrocytic endfeet. Proof of concept has been demonstrated in preclinical models. If translated to clinical use, aquaporumab would provide a truly disease-specific treatment for AQP4-IgG-positive NMOSD by preventing the antibody–target interaction that initiates the pathogenic cascade. This agent remains in early development and has not yet entered clinical trials.
| Agent | Target | Route | Dosing Interval | Approved Indications | Neurologic Investigation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eculizumab | C5 | IV | Every 2 weeks | NMOSD (AQP4+), MG, PNH, aHUS | Established |
| Ravulizumab | C5 (long-acting) | IV | Every 8 weeks | MG, PNH, aHUS | NMOSD (Phase 3) |
| Zilucoplan | C5 (peptide) | SC | Daily | MG | Potential NMOSD |
| Iptacopan | Factor B | Oral | Twice daily | PNH | Under investigation |
| Aquaporumab | AQP4 (competitive blocker) | TBD | TBD | None (preclinical) | NMOSD (preclinical) |
Next-Generation B-Cell Therapies
Anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies have become foundational treatments across multiple neuroimmunologic conditions. Newer anti-CD20 agents offer improvements in administration, infusion time, and immunogenicity. Additionally, agents targeting CD19 rather than CD20 can deplete plasmablasts and some plasma cells—populations that are CD20-negative but actively produce pathogenic antibodies.
Obinutuzumab
Obinutuzumab is a type II anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody that has been glycoengineered to enhance antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity. Compared with rituximab, it induces enhanced direct cell death of target B cells. It is under investigation in multiple sclerosis and could have applications in other B-cell-mediated neuroimmunologic conditions.
Ofatumumab
Ofatumumab is a fully human anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody approved by the FDA for relapsing forms of MS (2020). It is administered as a monthly subcutaneous self-injection following initial loading doses. As a fully human antibody, it has a lower risk of infusion reactions and anti-drug antibody formation compared with chimeric agents such as rituximab. Its subcutaneous administration model could potentially be applied to other neuroimmunologic conditions.
Ublituximab
Ublituximab is a glycoengineered anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody approved by the FDA for relapsing forms of MS (2022). Its distinguishing feature is a 1-hour infusion time, significantly faster than other intravenous anti-CD20 antibodies. Enhanced glycoengineering improves antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity.
Anti-CD19 Agents Beyond Inebilizumab
CD19 targeting is mechanistically important because it captures plasmablasts and some plasma cells in addition to mature B cells. These antibody-secreting cells have typically lost CD20 expression and therefore escape anti-CD20 therapy. In conditions where pathogenic antibodies are produced by CD20-negative cells, CD19-directed therapies may achieve more complete depletion of the relevant effector population. Inebilizumab (FDA approved for NMOSD) is the prototype, but additional CD19-targeting agents are in development.
Targeted T-Cell Therapies
While B-cell-directed therapies dominate the emerging pipeline for most antibody-mediated neurologic conditions, T-cell-targeted agents remain relevant for diseases in which cellular immunity plays a primary or contributory role.
Alemtuzumab (Anti-CD52)
Alemtuzumab depletes both B and T cells through targeting CD52. It is FDA approved for relapsing MS but its use is restricted to patients who have had inadequate responses to two or more other disease-modifying therapies, owing to serious autoimmune adverse effects including thyroid disease, immune thrombocytopenia, and anti-glomerular basement membrane disease. It is not commonly used outside of MS.
Abatacept
Abatacept is a CTLA-4 immunoglobulin fusion protein that blocks T-cell costimulation by preventing CD80/CD86 interaction with CD28. It is FDA approved for rheumatoid arthritis and is under investigation for immune-mediated neurologic conditions in which T-cell activation plays a pathogenic role.
Vidofludimus Calcium (IMU-838)
Vidofludimus calcium is a dihydroorotate dehydrogenase (DHODH) inhibitor that targets activated T and B cells by inhibiting de novo pyrimidine synthesis, which is required for lymphocyte proliferation. It is currently in Phase 3 trials for relapsing MS and represents a potential oral alternative to injectable therapies.
CAR-T Cell Therapy and Cellular Therapies
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy represents a paradigm shift from conventional pharmacologic immunosuppression to cellular immunotherapy. Originally developed for hematologic malignancies, CAR-T cell therapy is now being explored for refractory autoimmune diseases with remarkable early results.
CD19 CAR-T Cells
CD19 CAR-T cells are autologous T cells engineered to express a chimeric antigen receptor targeting CD19-positive B cells. Upon infusion, these engineered T cells seek out and eliminate CD19-expressing B cells, achieving deep and potentially durable B-cell depletion that may exceed what is achievable with antibody-based therapies.
The key advantage over rituximab and other anti-CD20 antibodies is that CAR-T cells may access tissue-resident B cells in lymphoid organs and other compartments not effectively penetrated by monoclonal antibodies. Preliminary results in refractory systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) have been dramatic, with multiple case series demonstrating sustained remissions following a single infusion of CD19 CAR-T cells.
Ongoing investigations include applications in refractory NMOSD, refractory MG, and anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis. However, significant risks must be considered:
- Cytokine release syndrome (CRS): systemic inflammatory response from massive T-cell activation; ranges from mild fever to life-threatening multiorgan failure
- Immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS): encephalopathy, seizures, cerebral edema; particularly concerning in patients with pre-existing neurologic disease
- Prolonged immunosuppression: deep B-cell depletion and hypogammaglobulinemia may persist for months to years
- Infections: increased susceptibility during B-cell aplasia
- Uncertain long-term safety: long-term consequences in autoimmune populations remain unknown
CAR-T cell therapy for autoimmune neurologic conditions is currently investigational and not yet standard of care.
BCMA-Targeted CAR-T Cells
B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) is expressed on plasma cells, including long-lived plasma cells that reside in bone marrow niches and continuously produce antibodies. BCMA-targeted CAR-T cells could eliminate these long-lived plasma cells that are resistant to both anti-CD20 and anti-CD19 therapies. This approach is under early investigation for antibody-mediated autoimmune diseases and may be particularly relevant for conditions in which pathogenic antibodies are produced by long-lived plasma cells.
Regulatory T-Cell (Treg) Therapy
Adoptive transfer of expanded regulatory T cells aims to restore immune tolerance rather than simply depleting pathogenic immune cells. This approach is under investigation for MS, type 1 diabetes, and other autoimmune conditions. Its potential application in autoimmune neurologic conditions is conceptually appealing but remains in very early stages of development.
Comparison: Conventional vs. Cellular Immunotherapy
- Monoclonal antibodies (rituximab, inebilizumab): deplete circulating B cells but may not access tissue-resident populations effectively; require repeated dosing
- CAR-T cells: can actively seek out and destroy target cells in tissues; potentially one-time treatment; but carry risks of CRS and ICANS
- BCMA-targeted therapies: uniquely target plasma cells that escape CD19/CD20-directed therapies; important for conditions sustained by long-lived plasma cells
- Treg therapy: aims to restore tolerance rather than deplete immune cells; theoretical advantage of addressing root cause of autoimmunity; very early development
Precision Medicine Approaches
The growing understanding of pathogenic mechanisms in neuroimmunologic conditions is enabling a shift from empiric immunosuppression toward rationally targeted therapy. Two key principles drive this evolution: biomarker-guided treatment decisions and antibody subclass-directed therapy selection.
Biomarker-Guided Therapy
Serum neurofilament light chain (NfL) is emerging as a biomarker of neuroaxonal injury across multiple neurologic conditions. In neuroimmunology, NfL levels can help guide treatment decisions by providing an objective measure of ongoing neural damage and can be used to monitor treatment response over time.
Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) is a marker of astrocytic injury that is characteristically elevated in NMOSD and GFAP astrocytopathy. Serum GFAP levels may complement NfL in distinguishing conditions with primary astrocytic injury from those with primarily neuronal or axonal damage.
MOG-IgG titers have prognostic implications in MOGAD: seroconversion to negative is associated with a lower relapse risk and may guide decisions about maintenance treatment duration and cessation.
B-cell monitoring is critical for timing rituximab re-dosing in NMOSD, as relapses have been observed coinciding with B-cell repopulation, particularly the CD27+ memory B-cell subset.
Important Caveat Regarding Antibody Titers
- For most autoimmune neurologic conditions, serial antibody titers are NOT reliably correlated with disease activity
- Clinical assessment remains the preferred metric for monitoring disease status and treatment response
- MOG-IgG is a partial exception, as seroreversion has prognostic value; however, persistently positive titers do not necessarily indicate ongoing disease activity
- Treatment decisions should not be based solely on antibody titer changes in the absence of clinical or radiographic evidence of disease activity
Antibody Subclass-Directed Therapy
The IgG subclass of pathogenic antibodies has direct implications for mechanism of injury and rational therapeutic selection:
| IgG Subclass | Examples | Pathogenic Mechanism | Rational Therapeutic Targets |
|---|---|---|---|
| IgG1 | AQP4-IgG, NMDA-R antibodies | Complement activation, ADCC | Complement inhibitors (eculizumab, ravulizumab), FcRn inhibitors, B-cell depletion |
| IgG4 | LGI1, CASPR2, MuSK-MG | Direct functional blockade; does NOT activate complement | FcRn inhibitors, B-cell depletion; complement inhibitors NOT rational |
Understanding the specific pathogenic mechanism—whether complement-dependent cytotoxicity, antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity, direct receptor blockade, or receptor internalization—enables rational therapy selection and avoids exposing patients to therapies unlikely to address their disease mechanism.
Key Ongoing Clinical Trials
| Therapy | Target / Mechanism | Condition Under Study | Phase | Key Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rozanolixizumab | FcRn inhibitor | MOGAD | Phase 3 | SC administration; reduces IgG by 50–70%; directly targets pathogenic MOG-IgG |
| Satralizumab | IL-6 receptor inhibitor | MOGAD | Phase 3 | Already FDA approved for NMOSD; SC every 4 weeks after loading; well-characterized safety profile |
| Ravulizumab | C5 complement inhibitor (long-acting) | NMOSD (AQP4+) | Phase 3 | Every 8-week dosing; potential to replace eculizumab with improved convenience |
| Nipocalimab | FcRn inhibitor | NMOSD (AQP4+) | Phase 3 | Novel FcRn approach for NMOSD; could offer alternative to complement inhibition |
| CD19 CAR-T cells | CD19+ B-cell depletion (cellular therapy) | Refractory autoimmune diseases (including NMOSD, MG) | Phase 1/2 | Dramatic early results in SLE; risk of CRS and ICANS; one-time treatment potential |
| Aquaporumab | AQP4 competitive blocker | NMOSD (AQP4+) | Preclinical | Disease-specific approach; blocks antibody–target interaction; proof of concept in animal models |
| Efgartigimod | FcRn antagonist | Antibody-mediated encephalitis | Exploratory | Approved for MG; selective IgG reduction (~70%); IV and SC formulations available |
| Vidofludimus calcium | DHODH inhibitor (T and B cells) | Relapsing MS | Phase 3 | Oral agent; inhibits activated lymphocyte proliferation; potential oral alternative to injectable DMTs |
Challenges and Future Directions
Key Challenges in Neuroimmunology Therapeutics
- Lack of head-to-head trials: for most neuroimmunologic conditions, direct comparisons between emerging therapies are unavailable, making evidence-based selection between agents difficult
- Limited pediatric data: most emerging therapies have been studied primarily in adults; pediatric dosing, efficacy, and safety data are sparse
- Cost barriers: biologic therapies, particularly complement inhibitors, carry substantial cost (eculizumab exceeds $500,000/year), limiting access in many healthcare settings
- Biomarker gaps: better biomarkers are needed to guide treatment initiation, escalation, and cessation; current clinical decision-making remains largely empiric
- MOGAD treatment paradox: most MOGAD patients are monophasic, creating risk of overtreatment; yet identifying which patients will relapse remains challenging
- Immune reconstitution vs. continuous suppression: whether one-time immune reconstitution therapies (e.g., alemtuzumab, CAR-T) offer better long-term outcomes than continuous immunosuppression remains uncertain
- Infection and malignancy risk: prolonged immunosuppression increases susceptibility to opportunistic infections and may elevate long-term malignancy risk
- Pregnancy planning: many immunosuppressive agents are contraindicated in pregnancy, requiring careful planning; FcRn inhibitors and some monoclonal antibodies may offer safer pregnancy profiles, but data are limited
Important Safety Considerations
- Many emerging therapies discussed in this topic are investigational and not yet approved for neurologic indications
- Off-label use of approved medications for neurologic conditions should be guided by expert consensus, institutional review, and shared decision-making with patients
- Long-term safety data for newer biologics, including FcRn inhibitors and next-generation complement inhibitors, remain limited
- CAR-T cell therapy for autoimmune neurologic indications is in very early stages; cytokine release syndrome and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome are serious and potentially life-threatening risks
- All complement inhibitors carry risk of meningococcal infection; vaccination is mandatory prior to treatment initiation
References
- McKeon A, Pittock SJ. Overview and diagnostic approach in autoimmune neurology. Continuum (Minneap Minn). 2024;30(4):960-994.
- Sechi E, Flanagan EP. NMOSD and MOGAD. Continuum (Minneap Minn). 2024;30(4):1052-1090.
- Muller F, Boeltz S, Knitza J, et al. CD19-targeted CAR T cells in refractory antisynthetase syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2023;388(25):2344-2348.
- Pittock SJ, Berthele A, Fujihara K, et al. Eculizumab in aquaporin-4-positive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(7):614-625.