← Back
NeuroTrials.ai
Neurology Clinical Trial Database

Cenobamate C017

Long-term Efficacy and Safety From an Open-Label Extension of Adjunctive Cenobamate in Patients With Uncontrolled Focal Seizures

Year of Publication: 2022

Authors: Pavel Klein, Sami Aboumatar, Christian Brandt, ..., Vicente Villanueva

Journal: Neurology

Citation: Neurology. 2022;99:e989-e998

Link: https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000200792

PDF: https://www.neurology.org/doi/pdfdirect/...000000000200792


Clinical Question

What is the long-term efficacy (percent seizure frequency reduction and responder rates), safety, and tolerability of adjunctive cenobamate in patients with uncontrolled focal seizures?

Bottom Line

Long-term efficacy, including 100% and ≥90% seizure reduction, was sustained during 48 months of cenobamate treatment, with 71% retention at 24 months. No new safety issues were identified, confirming findings from the double-blind study and supporting the potential long-term clinical benefit of cenobamate.

Major Points

  • This was an open-label extension of an 18-week double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase 2 study (NCT01866111)
  • 355 patients entered the OLE safety population (265 originally randomized to cenobamate, 90 to placebo)
  • Median duration of OLE exposure was 53.9 months (range 1.1-68.7 months)
  • As of July 2019, 58.9% of patients (209/355) were continuing cenobamate treatment
  • Retention rates: 83% at 12 months, 71% at 24 months, 65% at 36 months, 62% at 48 months
  • Among patients who completed 12 months (n=294), 73% remained on treatment through 48 months
  • Median percent seizure frequency reduction increased progressively, reaching 76.1% at months 43-48
  • Among observed patients during months 36-48: 16.4% achieved 100% seizure reduction, 39.1% achieved ≥90% reduction, 51.8% achieved ≥75% reduction, 76.4% achieved ≥50% reduction
  • Using initial mITT population as denominator: 10.2% achieved 100% seizure reduction and 24.3% achieved ≥90% reduction during months 36-48
  • Any consecutive ≥12-month duration of 100% seizure reduction occurred in 18.4% of patients (65/354)
  • Any consecutive ≥24-month duration of 100% seizure reduction occurred in 11.9% of patients (42/354)
  • Median duration of 100% seizure reduction was 45.1 months (IQR 27.4)
  • Median modal daily cenobamate dose was 300 mg (IQR 100 mg; range 50-400 mg)
  • Discontinuation reasons: lack of efficacy (16.6%), withdrawal by patient (8.7%), adverse events (7.6%)
  • Adverse events were primarily mild (21.7%) or moderate (45.4%) in severity
  • Most common adverse events occurred during the first month of OLE treatment

Design

Study Type: Multicenter, open-label extension

Randomization:

Blinding: 2-week blinded conversion period to cenobamate, then open-label

Enrollment Period: Following completion of 18-week double-blind study (July 31, 2013 to June 22, 2015 for parent study)

Follow-up Duration: Up to 68.7 months (median 53.9 months)

Countries: United States, Germany, Spain

Sample Size: 355

Analysis: Kaplan-Meier analysis for time to discontinuation. Two methods for responder rate analysis: (1) observed patient population at each interval as denominator, (2) initial OLE mITT population as denominator. Data cutoff: July 1, 2019. Safety population: all patients who entered OLE and took at least 1 dose of cenobamate. mITT population: all patients who took at least 1 dose of cenobamate and had any seizure data recorded in OLE.


Inclusion Criteria

  • Completed the 18-week double-blind study (NCT01866111)
  • Still met inclusion criteria from parent study except for seizure frequency
  • Met none of the exclusion criteria from parent study
  • Original study inclusion: Ages 18-70 years
  • Original study inclusion: Uncontrolled focal epilepsy with ≥8 seizures during 8-week baseline period
  • Original study inclusion: Taking 1-3 antiseizure medications

Exclusion Criteria

  • Did not complete the 18-week double-blind study
  • Did not meet inclusion criteria (except seizure frequency) from parent study
  • Met any exclusion criteria from parent study

Baseline Characteristics

All OLE Patients:

  • Number of patients: 355
  • Age, years, median (IQR): 38 (17)
  • Sex - Female: 170 (47.9%)
  • BMI, mean (SD), kg/m2: 26.4 (6.19)
  • Race - Caucasian/White: 306 (86.2%)
  • Race - Asian: 32 (9.0%)
  • Race - Black/African-American: 9 (2.5%)
  • Race - Other: 8 (2.3%)
  • Seizure type - Focal aware nonmotor: 75 (21.1%)
  • Seizure type - Focal aware motor: 77 (21.7%)
  • Seizure type - Focal impaired awareness: 275 (77.5%)
  • Seizure type - Focal to bilateral tonic-clonic: 209 (58.9%)
  • Baseline seizure frequency/28 days, median (IQR): 9.5 (15)
  • Baseline seizure frequency/28 days, mean (SD): 24.1 (56.9)
  • Number of baseline ASMs - 1: 55 (15.5%)
  • Number of baseline ASMs - 2: 139 (39.2%)
  • Number of baseline ASMs - 3: 154 (43.4%)
  • Number of baseline ASMs - >3: 7 (2.0%)
  • Concomitant ASM - Levetiracetam: 153 (43.1%)
  • Concomitant ASM - Lamotrigine: 118 (33.2%)
  • Concomitant ASM - Carbamazepine: 97 (27.3%)
  • Concomitant ASM - Valproate: 87 (24.5%)
  • Concomitant ASM - Topiramate: 63 (17.7%)
  • Concomitant ASM - Lacosamide: 61 (17.2%)
  • Concomitant ASM - Oxcarbazepine: 49 (13.8%)

Arms

FieldCenobamate
InterventionAll patients underwent 2-week blinded conversion to cenobamate target dose of 300 mg/day. For patients originally on placebo, open-label cenobamate started at 100 mg/day at week 1, then 200 mg/day at week 2, then 300 mg/day starting at week 3. Investigators could adjust dose between 50-400 mg/day during conversion. During OLE treatment phase, cenobamate dose could be adjusted (50-400 mg/day) and concomitant ASMs could be added, removed, or adjusted (no monotherapy allowed).
DurationUp to 68.7 months

Outcomes

OutcomeTypeControlInterventionHR / OR / RRP-value
Median percent change in focal seizure frequency over baseline by 6-month intervalsPrimary65.4% reduction at months 1-6, progressively increasing to 76.1% reduction at months 43-48. Similar results for patients originally treated with cenobamate or placebo in double-blind study.
100% seizure reduction at 12-month intervals (observed patients)Secondary13.3% (36/271) during months 12-24, 14.3% (34/237) during months 24-36, 16.4% (36/220) during months 36-48. Median duration of 100% seizure reduction: 48.0 months at 12-24 months, 47.2 months at 24-36 months, 45.1 months at 36-48 months.
100% seizure reduction at 12-month intervals (initial OLE mITT population)Secondary10.2% (36/354) during months 12-24, 9.6% (34/354) during months 24-36, 10.2% (36/354) during months 36-48
≥90% seizure reduction during months 36-48Secondary39.1% of observed patients (86/220), 24.3% of initial mITT population (86/354)
≥75% seizure reduction during months 36-48Secondary51.8% of observed patients (114/220), 32.2% of initial mITT population (114/354)
≥50% seizure reduction during months 36-48Secondary76.4% of observed patients (168/220), 47.5% of initial mITT population (168/354)
Any consecutive ≥12-month duration of 100% seizure reductionSecondary18.4% of patients (65/354)
Any consecutive ≥24-month duration of 100% seizure reductionSecondary11.9% of patients (42/354)
Retention rates at 12, 24, 36, and 48 monthsSecondary83%, 71%, 65%, and 62% respectively. Among patients who completed 12 months (n=294), 73% (215/294) remained on treatment through 48 months.
Median modal daily doseSecondary300 mg (IQR 100 mg; range 50-400 mg); mean (SD) modal dose 264.5 mg (89.1 mg)
Any TEAEAdverse313 (88.2%)
TEAE severity - MildAdverse77 (21.7%)
TEAE severity - ModerateAdverse161 (45.4%)
Serious TEAEsAdverse72 (20.3%)
Serious TEAEs related to cenobamateAdverse19 (5.4%)
TEAEs leading to discontinuationAdverse31 (8.7%)
DizzinessAdverse122 (34.4%), rate 18.8 per 100 patient-years
SomnolenceAdverse87 (24.5%), rate 11.1 per 100 patient-years
FatigueAdverse56 (15.8%), rate 6.9 per 100 patient-years
HeadacheAdverse54 (15.2%), rate 8.0 per 100 patient-years
DiplopiaAdverse51 (14.4%), rate 8.8 per 100 patient-years
Gait disturbancesAdverse41 (11.5%), rate 5.4 per 100 patient-years
Upper respiratory tract infectionAdverse38 (10.7%), rate 5.7 per 100 patient-years
DeathsAdverse6 deaths reported: pneumonia/sepsis, septicemia, fatal injuries after being struck by car, cardiogenic shock (39-year-old man with underlying ischemic cardiomyopathy), myocardial infarction, suicide (31-year-old man after 49.3 months of treatment). All considered unrelated to study drug by investigator.
Most common serious TEAEs (≥0.5%)AdverseSeizure (1.4%, n=5), vertigo (1.1%, n=4), seizure cluster (0.8%, n=3), dizziness (0.6%, n=2), epilepsy (0.6%, n=2), generalized tonic-clonic seizure (0.6%, n=2), myocardial infarction (0.6%, n=2), cholelithiasis (0.6%, n=2), pneumonia (0.6%, n=2), pyelonephritis (0.6%, n=2), sepsis (0.6%, n=2), accidental overdose (0.6%, n=2), clavicle fracture (0.6%, n=2), concussion (0.6%, n=2)
Nervous system disorders leading to discontinuationAdverse12 patients (3.4%): dizziness (0.8%, n=3), somnolence (0.6%, n=2), balance disorder (0.6%, n=2)
Psychiatric disorders leading to discontinuationAdverse6 patients (1.7%): depression (0.6%, n=2), plus 1 each of bradyphrenia, hallucination, persistent depressive disorder, psychotic disorder
Skin disorders leading to discontinuationAdverse6 patients (1.7%): 1 each of alopecia, angioedema, pruritus, maculopapular rash, skin lesion, toxic skin eruption

Subgroup Analysis

Efficacy results were generally comparable when analyzed separately by randomized treatment arm (originally cenobamate vs. placebo). Among patients who completed 12 months of cenobamate treatment (n=294), 73% remained on treatment through 48 months. Most common CNS-related adverse events occurred more frequently during the first month of OLE treatment (including the dose conversion period).


Criticisms

  • Uncontrolled study design (inherent limitation of open-label extension)
  • Potential confounders including use of and changes in concomitant ASM therapy and changes in cenobamate dose
  • Potential differences due to prior treatment with cenobamate in double-blind period may confound seizure reduction results
  • Reduced sample size over time and potential selection bias for remaining cohort
  • Lack of standardization of long-term efficacy reporting across studies makes comparisons difficult
  • No direct comparison to other antiseizure medications
  • Potential for drug-drug interactions between cenobamate and certain ASMs (phenytoin, clobazam)
  • Study population may not be representative of all patients with focal epilepsy due to inclusion/exclusion criteria

Funding

SK Life Science, Inc.

Based on: Cenobamate C017 (Neurology, 2022)

Authors: Pavel Klein, Sami Aboumatar, Christian Brandt, ..., Vicente Villanueva

Citation: Neurology. 2022;99:e989-e998

Content summarized and formatted by NeuroTrials.ai.