← Back
NeuroTrials.ai
Neurology Clinical Trial Database

Cannabis for Acute Migraine

Vaporized cannabis versus placebo for acute migraine: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial

Year of Publication: 2026

Authors: Nathaniel M. Schuster, Mark S. Wallace, Thomas D. Marcotte, ..., Michelle Sexton

Journal: Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain

Citation: Schuster NM, Wallace MS, Marcotte TD, Buse DC, Lee E, Liu L, Sexton M. Vaporized cannabis versus placebo for acute migraine: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial. Headache. 2026;66:365–376.

Link: https://doi.org/10.1111/head.70025


Clinical Question

Is vaporized cannabis effective for the acute treatment of migraine attacks?

Bottom Line

In the first RCT of cannabis for acute migraine, vaporized cannabis flower combining 6% THC + 11% CBD was superior to placebo for 2-h pain relief, pain freedom, and most-bothersome-symptom freedom, with benefits sustained to 48 h and no serious adverse events; THC alone helped pain relief but not pain freedom/MBS freedom, and CBD alone was ineffective.

Major Points

  • First randomized controlled trial to evaluate vaporized cannabis for acute migraine treatment (2025 Wolff Award Winner).
  • Combined THC + CBD (6% THC + 11% CBD) was superior to placebo across all three key endpoints at 2 h (pain relief, pain freedom, and MBS freedom), with sustained pain freedom at 24 h and sustained MBS freedom at 24 and 48 h.
  • THC-dominant (6% THC) was superior to placebo for 2-h pain relief only; CBD-dominant (11% CBD) showed no benefit on any endpoint — suggesting the THC+CBD combination is the effective formulation.
  • THC + CBD was superior to placebo for freedom from photophobia and phonophobia, but not nausea or vomiting.
  • There were no serious adverse events.

Design

Study Type: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 4-period crossover trial

Randomization: 1

Blinding: Double-blind; participants, research coordinators, investigators, and statisticians blinded until completion of initial analysis — only research pharmacists were unblinded. Blinding effectiveness assessed with Bang's Blinding Index.

Allocation: Simple 1:1:1:1 assignment to one of 24 possible treatment orders using Microsoft Excel random number function (by research pharmacist)

Enrollment Period: November 20, 2020 to November 4, 2022 (follow-up completed February 23, 2023)

Follow-up Duration: Surveys at 1, 2, 24, and 48 h after each treated attack; ≥1 week (≥7 day) washout between treated attacks

Centers: 1

Countries: United States

Sample Size: 92

Analyzed: 73

Analysis: Intention-to-treat (247 attacks, 73 participants), modified ITT (234 attacks, 71 participants), and sensitivity analysis (202 attacks, 70 participants); generalized linear mixed model (GLMM) with logit link and random intercept for repeated attacks. mITT reported by default.

Power Calculation: Assuming 68% pain-relief response for treatment vs 45% for placebo (based on an intranasal sumatriptan RCT), two-sided alpha=0.05 and 80% power required 72 participants; planned enrollment of 90 assuming 20% dropout.

Registration: NCT04360044


Inclusion Criteria

  • Aged 21 to 65 years
  • Migraine according to ICHD-3 criteria
  • 2 to 23 headache days and 2 to 23 migraine days per month
  • Agreement not to use cannabis (outside the study drug), opioids, or barbiturates
  • Agreement not to use other acute migraine treatments before or within 2 h after study drug administration

Exclusion Criteria

  • Screening urine drug test positive for THC, barbiturates, opioids, oxycodone, or methadone
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding
  • Known cognitive impairment
  • Current moderate–severe or severe depression
  • History of bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, or psychosis
  • History of substance use disorder
  • Active pulmonary disease or other severe medical illness (at researcher discretion)

Baseline Characteristics

Overall:

  • Median Age: 41 years
  • Female: 83% (76/92)
  • Attacks Treated: 247 attacks across 73 participants

Arms

FieldTHC-dominant (6% THC)CBD-dominant (11% CBD)THC + CBD (6% THC + 11% CBD)Control
N63606064
InterventionVaporized cannabis flower 5.62% THC + 0.03% CBD; 4 puffs via Foltin Uniform Puff Procedure at 180°C using Mighty Medic vaporizerVaporized cannabis flower 11.27% CBD + 0.35% THC; 4 puffs via FUPP at 180°CVaporized cannabis flower 6.16% THC + 10.77% CBD; 4 puffs via FUPP at 180°CVaporized placebo cannabis flower <0.025% THC + 0.14% CBD (THC and CBD chemically extracted); 4 puffs via FUPP at 180°C
DurationSingle migraine attack (one treatment period)Single migraine attack (one treatment period)Single migraine attack (one treatment period)Single migraine attack (one treatment period)

Outcomes

OutcomeTypeControlInterventionHR / OR / RRP-value
2-h pain relief (reduction of pain from moderate/severe to mild/none) — primary positive comparison THC + CBD vs placeboPrimaryPlacebo 46.6%THC + CBD 67.2%2.850.016
Secondary15.5%34.5%3.30.017
Secondary34.5%60.3%3.320.005
Secondary46.6%68.9%3.140.008
Secondary46.6%~53% (mITT 30/57)>0.05
Secondary54% (30/56)2.560.039
Secondary66% (38/58)4.72
SecondarySuperior to placebo (THC + CBD)
SafetyNone reported across all treatments

Subgroup Analysis

Results were consistent across ITT, mITT, and sensitivity analyses for the primary endpoint (2-h pain relief) and the co-secondary endpoints (2-h pain freedom and MBS freedom).


Criticisms

  • Single-center trial conducted at one academic site (UCSD), limiting generalizability.
  • Long-term effects of frequent cannabis use were not examined.
  • NIDA Drug Supply Program cannabis potencies were lower than typical recreational/dispensary products, which may limit applicability to commonly available products.
  • Blinding is inherently challenging with psychoactive THC; blinding index (Bang's BI) was assessed to address this.
  • Predominantly female population (83%).

Funding

Migraine Research Foundation; Academic Senate, University of California, San Diego; National Institutes of Health (Grant UL1TR001442). Cannabis flower supplied by the NIDA Drug Supply Program.

Based on: Cannabis for Acute Migraine (Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain, 2026)

Authors: Nathaniel M. Schuster, Mark S. Wallace, Thomas D. Marcotte, ..., Michelle Sexton

Citation: Schuster NM, Wallace MS, Marcotte TD, Buse DC, Lee E, Liu L, Sexton M. Vaporized cannabis versus placebo for acute migraine: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial. Headache. 2026;66:365–376.

Content summarized and formatted by NeuroTrials.ai.