← Back
NeuroTrials.ai
Neurology Clinical Trial Database

CHAMP

Childhood and Adolescent Migraine Prevention (CHAMP): Trial of Amitriptyline, Topiramate, and Placebo for Pediatric Migraine

Year of Publication: 2017

Authors: Scott W. Powers, Christopher S. Coffey, Leigh A. Chamberlin, ..., for the CHAMP Investigators

Journal: New England Journal of Medicine

Citation: N Engl J Med 2017;376:115-24

Link: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1610384

PDF: https://www.nejm.org/doi/pdf/10.1056/NEJMoa1610384


Clinical Question

Which medication, if any, should be used to prevent headache in children and adolescents with pediatric migraine - amitriptyline, topiramate, or neither?

Bottom Line

Neither amitriptyline nor topiramate was superior to placebo for reducing headache frequency or disability in pediatric migraine over 24 weeks, and both active drugs were associated with higher rates of adverse events including serious psychiatric effects. These findings suggest that preventive medication strategies effective in adults may not apply to pediatric patients, and the high placebo response rate (61%) may indicate a role for non-pharmacological approaches

Major Points

  • Phase 3, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial randomized 361 children/adolescents 8-17 years with migraine in 2:2:1 ratio to amitriptyline, topiramate, or placebo
  • Trial was stopped early for futility after planned interim analysis of 225 patients showed conditional power of only 16% for amitriptyline vs placebo and 14% for topiramate vs placebo
  • Primary outcome (β‰₯50% reduction in headache days) showed no significant differences: 52% amitriptyline, 55% topiramate, 61% placebo (p=0.26 and p=0.48)
  • Very high placebo response rate (61%) consistent with previous pediatric headache trials, possibly advantageous for this population
  • No significant differences in any secondary outcomes including PedMIDAS disability scores, absolute headache day reduction, or trial completion rates
  • Absolute reduction in headache days similar across groups: -6.7 days amitriptyline, -6.7 days topiramate, -5.9 days placebo (all clinically meaningful)
  • Active drugs associated with significantly higher adverse event rates: fatigue (30% amitriptyline, 25% topiramate vs 14% placebo) and paresthesia (31% topiramate vs 7% amitriptyline vs 8% placebo)
  • Serious psychiatric adverse events occurred with active treatments: 3 altered mood events with amitriptyline and 1 suicide attempt with topiramate
  • Adherence was good with 81% of amitriptyline and 74% of topiramate patients having detectable drug levels
  • Results suggest adult migraine treatment models may not apply to pediatric patients, and data do not support favorable risk-benefit profile for these medications in children
  • Study population representative of typical pediatric migraine patients seen in clinical practice based on epidemiological data
  • Multiple sensitivity analyses confirmed robustness of null findings across different missing data assumptions

Design

Study Type: Phase 3, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial with 2:2:1 allocation ratio

Blinding: Double-blind: patients, families, site investigators, site staff, and data coordinating center all masked to treatment assignment throughout the trial

Sample Size: 361

Centers: 31

Follow-up Duration: 24 weeks treatment period (8 weeks dose escalation, 16 weeks maintenance) plus 2-week weaning and 4-week follow-up = 30 weeks total


Inclusion Criteria

  • Children and adolescents aged 8 to 17 years
  • Diagnosis of migraine with or without aura, or chronic migraine without continuous headache per International Classification of Headache Disorders 2nd Edition (ICHD-II) criteria
  • Excluding complicated migraine (hemiplegic, basilar-type, ophthalmoplegic, migrainous infarction)
  • PedMIDAS score 11 to 139 (range 0-240; excludes no disability [0-10] and very severe disability [>139])
  • Headache frequency β‰₯4 days from prospective diary over 28-day baseline period
  • At randomization: provided diary data on β‰₯20 of 28 baseline days
  • At randomization: β‰₯15 headache days, each consisting of β‰₯4 hours continuous headache
  • At randomization: β‰₯50% of headache days were migraine or probable migraine days
  • At randomization: β‰₯4 distinct headache episodes, each lasting β‰₯4 hours
  • Written permission from parent/guardian and appropriate child assent

Exclusion Criteria

  • Medical condition that might increase risk with botulinum toxin A exposure (myasthenia gravis, Eaton-Lambert syndrome, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, any significant disease interfering with neuromuscular function)
  • Diagnosis of other primary or secondary headache disorder
  • Use of any headache prophylactic medication within 28 days of baseline day 1
  • Beck Depression Inventory score >24 at baseline day 1
  • Temporomandibular disorder
  • Fibromyalgia
  • Psychiatric disorders that could interfere with study participation
  • Previous exposure at any time to any botulinum toxin serotype
  • For women of childbearing potential: positive pregnancy test or not using reliable contraception

Outcomes

OutcomeTypeControlInterventionHR / OR / RRP-value
Relative reduction of 50% or more in number of headache days comparing 28-day baseline period with last 28 days of 24-week trial. Headache day defined as calendar day (00:00 to 23:59) when patient reported β‰₯4 continuous hours of headache per daily diaryPrimary61% (40/66)52% amitriptyline (69/132); 55% topiramate (72/130)8.33%Amitriptyline vs placebo p=0.26; Topiramate vs placebo p=0.48; Amitriptyline vs topiramate p=0.49

Criticisms

  • Trial stopped early for futility may have limited ability to detect smaller treatment effects, though multiple sensitivity analyses supported null findings
  • Very high placebo response rate (61%) may have made it difficult to demonstrate drug superiority, though this is consistent with pediatric headache literature
  • Relatively short 24-week treatment duration may not capture longer-term benefits or harms of these medications
  • Dose escalation over 8 weeks followed by only 16-week maintenance may have been insufficient time at therapeutic dose
  • No active comparator between the two drugs and placebo - would have benefited from head-to-head comparison in separate powered trial
  • Inclusion of both episodic (4-14 days) and chronic (β‰₯15 days) migraine may have created heterogeneous population, though stratification attempted to address this
  • Predominantly female (68%) and white (70%) population limits generalizability to more diverse pediatric populations
  • Two-thirds of patients had previously tried and failed prophylactic medications, suggesting potentially treatment-refractory population
  • No assessment of non-pharmacological interventions or behavioral treatments that might enhance or replace medication
  • Missing data rate of 21% in amitriptyline and 22% in topiramate groups (vs 11% placebo) could introduce bias despite intention-to-treat analysis
  • Adherence measured by drug levels only in subset of patients, not all participants
  • Study powered for 70% drug response vs 50% placebo, but actual rates were much lower, raising questions about initial assumptions
  • No long-term follow-up data after weaning period to assess durability of effects or rebound
  • Child Depression Inventory and BRIEF assessments done quarterly may have missed psychiatric adverse events between visits
  • Exclusion of very severe disability (PedMIDAS >139) limits applicability to most severely affected children

Funding

National Institutes of Health grants U01NS076788 and U01NS077108 from the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) and Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development

Based on: CHAMP (New England Journal of Medicine, 2017)

Authors: Scott W. Powers, Christopher S. Coffey, Leigh A. Chamberlin, ..., for the CHAMP Investigators

Citation: N Engl J Med 2017;376:115-24

Reviewed by: Monique Montenegro, MD

Content summarized and formatted by NeuroTrials.ai.