← Back
NeuroTrials.ai
Neurology Clinical Trial Database

RESOLUTION

Eptinezumab With Patient Education for Chronic Migraine and Medication-Overuse Headache: The Randomized, Placebo-Controlled RESOLUTION Trial

Year of Publication: 2026

Authors: Rigmor Højland Jensen, Christofer Lundqvist, Henrik W. Schytz, ..., Richard B. Lipton

Journal: Neurology

Citation: Neurology 2026;106:e214863

Link: https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000214863


Clinical Question

Does eptinezumab combined with brief patient education reduce migraine burden more than patient education alone in adults with chronic migraine and medication-overuse headache?

Bottom Line

In adults with chronic migraine and medication-overuse headache, a single IV infusion of eptinezumab 100 mg combined with brief patient education significantly reduced monthly migraine days, headache days, acute medication use, and pain severity compared with placebo plus education, with benefits evident from weeks 1–4 and sustained through 12 weeks. Nearly 38% of eptinezumab patients no longer met criteria for either chronic migraine or MOH within the first month. This supports initiating anti-CGRP preventive therapy concurrently with patient education rather than sequential withdrawal-first approaches.

Major Points

  • Primary endpoint met: eptinezumab + BEI reduced MMDs by 6.9 days vs 3.7 days with placebo + BEI over weeks 1–4 (difference −3.2; 95% CI −4.2 to −2.2; p < 0.0001), exceeding the pre-specified assumed effect size of 1.5 days
  • All 9 key secondary endpoints were met with full multiplicity control, demonstrating consistent superiority of eptinezumab across MMDs, MHDs, diagnostic status, pain severity, and acute medication use
  • 37.8% of eptinezumab vs 18.1% of placebo participants no longer fulfilled criteria for either CM or MOH at weeks 1–4 (OR 3.3), demonstrating a qualitative diagnostic shift
  • Monthly days with acute migraine medication use decreased by 11.3 days with eptinezumab vs 7.7 days with placebo (weeks 1–4), suggesting effective medication withdrawal without a formal wean
  • Average daily pain was reduced significantly more with eptinezumab as early as weeks 1–2, which is clinically valuable since headache intensity may worsen after acute medication withdrawal
  • PGIC and PI-MBS scores consistently favored eptinezumab at weeks 4 and 12, reflecting patient-perceived global improvement
  • Safety was comparable between groups (TEAEs 41.9% vs 36.9%); no new safety signals were identified
  • The trial could not determine the independent contribution of BEI vs eptinezumab since all participants received BEI for ethical reasons
  • Results support the IHS position statement advocating for early preventive intervention to prevent disease progression, rather than sequential withdrawal-first approaches
  • 98% completion rate (596/608) indicates high participant retention and data quality

Design

Study Type: Phase 4, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled trial

Randomization: 1

Blinding: Double-blind; placebo participants received 100 mL IV 0.9% saline; centralized interactive response technology used for randomization

Allocation: 1:1

Enrollment Period: July 2022 to March 2025

Follow-up Duration: 12 weeks (placebo-controlled period); 36 weeks total including open-label and safety follow-up

Centers: 76

Countries: Australia, Denmark, France, Georgia, Germany, Italy, Netherlands, Norway, Spain, Sweden, United States

Sample Size: 608

Analyzed: 602

Analysis: Modified intent-to-treat (full-analysis set); mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM) for primary endpoint; gatekeeper approach for multiplicity control across primary and key secondary endpoints

Power Calculation: 270 participants per group to provide 80% power at 2-sided 5% significance level, assuming treatment effect of −1.5 MMDs and SD of 6.2; 285 per group randomized assuming 5% attrition

Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05452239; EudraCT 2021-003049-40; EU CTR 2024-510729-24-00


Inclusion Criteria

  • Adults aged 18–75 years
  • Diagnosis of chronic migraine per ICHD-3
  • Diagnosis of medication-overuse headache per ICHD-3
  • Migraine onset at age ≤50 years
  • History of migraine ≥12 months before screening
  • ≥1 preventive treatment failure within past 5 years (lack of efficacy at recommended dose for ≥3 months, side effects, or poor tolerability)
  • During 4-week screening: ≥15 headache days (≥8 migraine days)
  • Overuse of acute/symptomatic headache medication (≥10 days/month or ≥15 days/month depending on medication class)

Exclusion Criteria

  • Treatment failure with a previous preventive treatment targeting the CGRP pathway within the previous 5 years
  • History or diagnosis of any other type of headache, migraine, or other specified diagnoses
  • Barbiturate and/or opioid analgesic use >4 days per month during screening

Arms

FieldEptinezumab + BEIControl
N303301
InterventionEptinezumab 100 mg administered IV over 30–45 minutes at baseline (day 0), preceded by a standardized ~10-minute brief educational intervention (BEI) comprising assessment of dependency-like behavior, education on medication overuse and chronic headache association, and agreed plan to discontinue overused medication100 mL IV 0.9% saline administered over 30–45 minutes at baseline (day 0), preceded by the same standardized ~10-minute brief educational intervention (BEI)
DurationSingle infusion; 12-week placebo-controlled periodSingle infusion; 12-week placebo-controlled period

Outcomes

OutcomeTypeControlInterventionHR / OR / RRP-value
Mean change from baseline in monthly migraine days (MMDs) over weeks 1–4Primary−3.7 (SE 0.52)−6.9 (SE 0.52)<0.0001
Change from baseline in MMDs (weeks 1–12)Secondary−4.5 (SE 0.51)−7.4 (SE 0.51)<0.0001
Change from baseline in MHDs (weeks 1–4)Secondary−3.4 (SE 0.50)−6.5 (SE 0.50)<0.0001
Change from baseline in MHDs (weeks 1–12)Secondary−4.5 (SE 0.50)−7.4 (SE 0.50)<0.0001
No longer fulfilling criteria for neither CM nor MOH (weeks 1–4)Secondary54/298 (18.1%)113/299 (37.8%)<0.0001
No longer fulfilling criteria for neither CM nor MOH (weeks 1–12)Secondary38/300 (12.7%)82/302 (27.2%)<0.0001
Change from baseline in average daily pain assessment score (weeks 1–2)Secondary−0.3 (SE 0.05)−0.6 (SE 0.05)<0.0001
Change from baseline in monthly days with acute migraine medication use (weeks 1–4)Secondary−7.7 (SE 0.51)−11.3 (SE 0.51)<0.0001
Change from baseline in monthly days with acute migraine medication use (weeks 1–12)Secondary−7.8 (SE 0.49)−11.2 (SE 0.49)<0.0001
No longer fulfilling CM criteria (weeks 1–4)Secondary97/299 (32.4%)165/299 (55.2%)<0.0001
No longer fulfilling CM criteria (weeks 1–12)Secondary69/300 (23.0%)134/302 (44.4%)<0.0001
No longer fulfilling MOH criteria (weeks 1–4)Secondary95/298 (31.9%)156/299 (52.2%)<0.0001
No longer fulfilling MOH criteria (weeks 1–12)Secondary72/300 (24.0%)121/302 (40.1%)<0.0001
PGIC score at week 4Secondary3.62.6<0.0001
PGIC score at week 12Secondary3.52.6<0.0001
PI-MBS score at week 12Secondary3.62.9<0.0001
Any TEAESafety111/301 (36.9%)127/303 (41.9%)
Mild TEAEsSafety64/301 (21.3%)70/303 (23.1%)
Moderate TEAEsSafety41/301 (13.6%)50/303 (16.5%)
Severe TEAEsSafety6/301 (2.0%)7/303 (2.3%)
Serious TEAEsSafety1/301 (0.3%)2/303 (0.7%)
TEAE leading to treatment withdrawalSafety3/301 (1.0%)1/303 (0.3%)
TEAE leading to infusion interruptionSafety1/301 (0.3%)2/303 (0.7%)
Any treatment-emergent AESISafety9/301 (3.0%)13/303 (4.3%)
Hypersensitivity and anaphylactic reactionsSafety4/301 (1.3%)6/303 (2.0%)
Cardiovascular/cerebrovascular eventsSafety3/301 (1.0%)1/303 (0.3%)
NasopharyngitisAdverse17/301 (5.6%)15/303 (5.0%)
InfluenzaAdverse10/301 (3.3%)11/303 (3.6%)
DizzinessAdverse9/301 (3.0%)8/303 (2.6%)
FatigueAdverse11/301 (3.7%)6/303 (2.0%)
AngioedemaAdverse0/301 (0%)1/303 (0.3%)
UrticariaAdverse0/301 (0%)1/303 (0.3%)
PruritisAdverse2/301 (0.7%)3/303 (1.0%)
HypertensionAdverse2/301 (0.7%)1/303 (0.3%)
Venous thrombosis limbAdverse1/301 (0.3%)0/303 (0%)

Subgroup Analysis

Randomization was stratified by country and number of previous preventive treatment failures (≤2 vs >2). Approximately 44% of participants had >2 previous preventive treatment failures. Detailed subgroup analyses were not reported in this manuscript for the placebo-controlled period but are planned for future publications.


Criticisms

  • No arm without BEI was included, so the independent contribution of patient education vs eptinezumab cannot be determined
  • The causal relationship between migraine/headache reductions and acute medication use reductions cannot be disentangled since improvements occurred simultaneously
  • 97.8% of participants were from Europe, limiting generalizability to other regions and ethnicities
  • Race data were unknown/not collected for 48.2% of participants due to local European legislation
  • Patients with prior CGRP pathway treatment failure, significant opioid/barbiturate use (>4 days/month), clinically significant psychiatric or cardiovascular disease, or confounding pain syndromes were excluded, limiting generalizability
  • Results are specific to CM with MOH and may not apply to MOH with other underlying headache disorders
  • Only a single dose of eptinezumab 100 mg was tested; no dose-response assessment with the 300 mg dose
  • The 12-week placebo-controlled period is relatively short for a chronic condition; longer-term controlled data are not available from this design
  • The assumed treatment effect for power calculation was −1.5 MMDs, but the observed effect was −3.2 MMDs, suggesting the trial was substantially overpowered for the primary endpoint

Funding

The trial was sponsored and funded by H. Lundbeck A/S, including medical writing support. The sponsor participated in design and conduct of the trial and in collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of data. All authors had access to the relevant data.

Based on: RESOLUTION (Neurology, 2026)

Authors: Rigmor Højland Jensen, Christofer Lundqvist, Henrik W. Schytz, ..., Richard B. Lipton

Citation: Neurology 2026;106:e214863

Content summarized and formatted by NeuroTrials.ai.