← Back
NeuroTrials.ai
Neurology Clinical Trial Database

STRIVE

Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Erenumab in Migraine Prevention

Year of Publication: 2017

Authors: Peter J. Goadsby, Uwe Reuter, Yngve Hallström, ..., Robert A. Lenz

Journal: New England Journal of Medicine

Citation: N Engl J Med 2017;377:2123-32

PDF: https://www.nejm.org/doi/pdf/10.1056/NEJMoa1705848


Clinical Question

Does erenumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody that inhibits the CGRP receptor, effectively prevent episodic migraine when administered monthly at doses of 70 mg or 140 mg?

Bottom Line

Erenumab administered subcutaneously at a monthly dose of 70 mg or 140 mg significantly reduced migraine frequency, the effects of migraines on daily activities, and the use of acute migraine-specific medication over 6 months with a safety profile similar to placebo

Major Points

  • First phase 3 trial of CGRP pathway-targeted therapy for episodic migraine prevention
  • 955 patients randomized 1:1:1 to erenumab 70 mg, 140 mg, or placebo for 6 months
  • Mean migraine days reduced by 3.2 days (70 mg) and 3.7 days (140 mg) vs 1.8 days placebo
  • 50% responder rates: 43.3% (70 mg), 50.0% (140 mg) vs 26.6% placebo
  • Significant reductions in acute medication use and improvements in physical functioning
  • Rapid onset of effect from month 1
  • Safety profile similar to placebo with no cardiovascular safety signals

Design

Study Type: Randomized controlled trial

Randomization: 1

Blinding: Double-blind, placebo-controlled with patients, site personnel, and sponsor personnel masked to treatment assignment

Enrollment Period: July 2015 to September 5, 2016

Follow-up Duration: 6 months (double-blind treatment phase reported)

Centers: 121

Countries: United States, Canada, Multiple European countries, Turkey

Sample Size: 955

Analysis: Linear mixed-effects model without imputation for continuous endpoints; stratified Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test for 50% responder rate; hierarchical gatekeeping procedure for multiplicity adjustment


Inclusion Criteria

  • Adults 18-65 years of age
  • History of migraine with or without aura for ≥12 months
  • 4-14 migraine days per month on average
  • <15 headache days per month on average
  • ≥80% adherence to electronic diary during baseline phase
  • Protocol amendment allowed inclusion of patients on one stable migraine-preventive medication

Exclusion Criteria

  • Age >50 years at migraine onset
  • History of hemiplegic migraine or cluster headache
  • Botulinum toxin use within 4 months before or during baseline
  • Use of devices or procedures for migraine prevention within 2 months before baseline
  • No therapeutic response to >2 migraine-preventive treatment categories

Baseline Characteristics

CharacteristicControlActive
Mean age41.3 years
Female sex85.9%
Mean migraine days per month8.2
Mean headache days per month9.3
Mean migraine attacks per month5.1
Days of acute medication use per month3.4
History of preventive failure39.8%
Current preventive medication use3.1%
70 mg - Mean age41.1 years
70 mg - Female sex84.5%
70 mg - Mean migraine days per month8.3
140 mg - Mean age40.4 years
140 mg - Female sex85.3%
140 mg - Mean migraine days per month8.3
140 mg - Mean headache days per month9.3

Arms

FieldErenumab 70 mgErenumab 140 mgControl
InterventionMonthly subcutaneous injection of 70 mg erenumab at day 1 and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20Monthly subcutaneous injection of 140 mg erenumab at day 1 and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20Monthly subcutaneous injection of placebo at day 1 and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20
Duration6 months6 months6 months

Outcomes

OutcomeTypeControlInterventionHR / OR / RRP-value
Change from baseline to months 4-6 in mean number of migraine days per monthPrimary-1.8 days70 mg: -3.2 days; 140 mg: -3.7 days<0.001 for both doses
≥50% reduction in mean migraine days per monthSecondary26.6%70 mg: 43.3%; 140 mg: 50.0%70 mg: 2.13 (1.52-2.98); 140 mg: 2.81 (2.01-3.94)<0.001 for both doses
Change in days of acute migraine-specific medication use per monthSecondary-0.2 days70 mg: -1.1 days; 140 mg: -1.6 days70 mg difference: -0.9 (-1.2 to -0.6); 140 mg: -1.4 (-1.7 to -1.1)<0.001 for both doses
Change in MPFID everyday-activities scoreSecondary-3.3 points70 mg: -5.5 points; 140 mg: -5.9 points70 mg difference: -2.2 (-3.3 to -1.2); 140 mg: -2.6 (-3.6 to -1.5)<0.001 for both doses
Change in MPFID physical-impairment scoreSecondary-2.4 points70 mg: -4.2 points; 140 mg: -4.8 points70 mg difference: -1.9 (-3.0 to -0.8); 140 mg: -2.4 (-3.5 to -1.4)<0.001 for both doses
Any adverse eventAdverse201 (63.0%)70 mg: 180 (57.3%); 140 mg: 177 (55.5%)
Injection-site painAdverse1 (0.3%)70 mg: 10 (3.2%); 140 mg: 1 (0.3%)
Serious adverse eventsAdverse7 (2.2%)70 mg: 8 (2.5%); 140 mg: 6 (1.9%)
Discontinuation due to AEsAdverse8 (2.5%)70 mg: 7 (2.2%); 140 mg: 7 (2.2%)

Subgroup Analysis

90.4% of erenumab patients and 87.1% of placebo patients received all 6 planned doses. Anti-erenumab binding antibodies detected in 5.6% of patients (8.0% in 70 mg group, 3.2% in 140 mg group), with neutralizing antibodies in only 0.2%


Criticisms

  • Exclusion of patients with no response to >2 migraine-preventive drug classes limits generalizability
  • Long-term safety and durability of effect require further study
  • 6-month follow-up relatively short for chronic preventive therapy
  • No direct comparison with existing oral migraine-preventive treatments
  • Industry-sponsored trial with authors having financial relationships with sponsor
  • Medical writer funded by Amgen wrote first draft

Funding

Amgen and Novartis (co-developers of erenumab)

Based on: STRIVE (New England Journal of Medicine, 2017)

Authors: Peter J. Goadsby, Uwe Reuter, Yngve Hallström, ..., Robert A. Lenz

Citation: N Engl J Med 2017;377:2123-32

Reviewed by: Monique Montenegro, MD

Content summarized and formatted by NeuroTrials.ai.