← Back
NeuroTrials.ai
Neurology Clinical Trial Database

Home-Based taVNS in PD

Home-based transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) improves motor and non-motor symptoms by improving autonomic and brain functions in patients with Parkinson's disease: A randomized clinical trial

Year of Publication: 2026

Authors: Wang R et al.

Journal: Neurotherapeutics

Citation: Neurotherapeutics. 2026 Jan 17;e00832. DOI:10.1016/j.neurot.2026.e00832

Link: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurot.2026.e00832

Bottom Line

Home-based bilateral taVNS reduced MDS-UPDRS-III by 6.10 points and significantly improved quality of life, sleep, and autonomic function vs sham over 3 weeks, with elevated serum acetylcholine and reduced central glutamate as putative mechanisms; well-tolerated with no serious adverse events.

Major Points

  • First randomized sham-controlled trial of home-based wearable taVNS in PD showing a clinically meaningful MDS-UPDRS-III reduction of 6.10 ± 4.29 points (exceeds MCID of 3.25)
  • Significant secondary benefits in quality of life (PDQ-39), sleep (PDSS-2), and autonomic function (SCOPA-AUT) but not in mood, fatigue, or cognition
  • Biomarker support: serum acetylcholine rose and correlated with motor improvement (r=0.456, p=0.038); GluCEST showed decreased striatal and thalamic glutamate; DTI revealed increased FA in left hippocampal cingulum and right inferior longitudinal fasciculus
  • Favorable tolerability: AEs 20% (5/25) on taVNS vs 4.2% (1/24) on sham (NS); only 2 taVNS withdrawals (headache, diarrhea); no SAEs
  • Registered as ChiCTR2300070828; single-center Chinese study calls for confirmation in independent populations

Design

Study Type: Randomized, single-blind, sham-controlled clinical trial

Randomization: 1

Blinding: Single-blind (participants and outcome assessors blinded; principal investigator unblinded)

Enrollment Period: April 2023 - January 2024

Follow-up Duration: 3 weeks (no long-term follow-up)

Centers: 1

Countries: China

Sample Size: 49

Analysis: ITT analyses with per-group baseline-vs-week-3 comparisons and between-group comparisons


Inclusion Criteria

  • Aged 18 years or older
  • PD per UK PD Society Brain Bank Diagnostic Criteria
  • Hoehn & Yahr stage 1-3
  • Stable PD medication doses for ≥30 days prior to and during the trial
  • Willing to sign the informed consent form

Exclusion Criteria

  • Abrupt-onset Parkinsonism
  • Visual hallucinations or psychiatric symptoms
  • Ear trauma, pain, or anatomical ear damage
  • Major cardiovascular disease, brain surgery, or neurogenic orthostatic hypotension
  • Use of anticholinergic medications
  • Allergy to surface electrodes
  • Pregnancy or lactation
  • Substantial medical knowledge that might unblind treatment

Baseline Characteristics

CharacteristicActive (taVNS)Sham
Mean Age64.00 ± 10.85 years62.70 ± 12.23 years
Sex - Male16/21 (76.2%)13/20 (65.0%)
H-Y Stage1-3 (matched)1-3 (matched)
Completers21/2520/24

Arms

FieldtaVNSControl
InterventionBilateral cymba conchae taVNS (5 Hz, 500 μs, individually titrated amplitude) 30 min twice daily for 3 weeks via wearable deviceSham electrode at inner arm with identical device settings (30 min twice daily × 3 weeks)
Duration3 weeks3 weeks

Outcomes

OutcomeTypeControlInterventionHR / OR / RRP-value
Change in MDS-UPDRS-III from baseline to 3 weeks in OFF statePrimarytaVNS: −6.10 ± 4.29 points (p<0.0001 vs baseline) · Sham: No significant change (p=0.1013) · Between-group p-value: <0.0001 · Subscore improvements: Bradykinesia −1.71, tremor −2.05, rigidity −1.67 (exceeds MCID of 3.25)
PDQ-39 (quality of life)SecondarytaVNS: Significant ↓ (p<0.001) · Sham: No change (p=0.67) · Between-group P-value: <0.001
PDSS-2 (sleep)SecondarytaVNS: Significant ↓ (p<0.001) · Sham: Significant ↓ (p<0.05) · Between-group P-value: <0.05
SCOPA-AUT (autonomic dysfunction)SecondarytaVNS: Significant ↓ (p<0.01) · Sham: No change (p>0.99) · Between-group P-value: <0.01
HAMA (anxiety)SecondarytaVNS: Significant ↓ (p<0.01) · Sham: Significant ↓ (p<0.01) · Between-group P-value: 0.68 (NS)
HAMD (depression)SecondarytaVNS: Significant ↓ (p<0.05) · Sham: No change (p=0.19) · Between-group P-value: 0.24 (NS)
PAC-SYM (constipation)SecondarytaVNS: ↓ (p<0.001) · Sham: ↓ (p<0.05) · Between-group P-value: 0.26 (NS)
FS-14 (fatigue)SecondarytaVNS: No change · Sham: No change · Between-group P-value: 0.96 (NS)
MoCA (cognition)SecondarytaVNS: No change · Sham: No change · Between-group P-value: 0.42 (NS)
Serum acetylcholineSecondarytaVNS: Significant ↑ (p<0.001); correlated with MDS-UPDRS-III improvement (r=0.456, p=0.038) · Sham: No change (p=0.78) · Between-group P-value: <0.01
GluCEST - striatum onset sideSecondarytaVNS: ↓ (p<0.001) · Sham: No change · Between-group P-value: <0.001
GluCEST - thalamus onset sideSecondarytaVNS: ↓ (p<0.01) · Sham: No change · Between-group P-value: <0.05
ReHo (BOLD-fMRI) rolandic operculumSecondarytaVNS: ↑ (FWE corrected p<0.001) · Sham: No change · Between-group P-value: <0.001
DTI FA left hippocampal cingulum (CGH)SecondarytaVNS: ↑ significantly · Sham: No change · Between-group P-value: <0.05
DTI FA right inferior longitudinal fasciculus (ILF)SecondarytaVNS: ↑ significantly · Sham: No change · Between-group P-value: <0.05
OverallAdverse5/25 (20%) taVNS vs 1/24 (4.2%) sham; no significant difference (Fisher's exact)
Serious AEAdverseNone reported; all AEs CTCAE grade 1-2
NauseaAdverse8.0% (2/25) vs 0% — both grade 1
HeadacheAdverse4.0% (1/25) vs 0% — grade 2 (withdrawal)
DiarrheaAdverse4.0% (1/25) vs 0% — grade 1 (withdrawal)
Pain at stimulation siteAdverse4.0% (1/25) vs 4.2% (1/24)
Withdrawals due to AEsAdverse2 taVNS, 0 sham

Subgroup Analysis

Serum acetylcholine increase correlated with motor improvement (r=0.456, p=0.038), supporting a cholinergic mechanism


Criticisms

  • Short follow-up (3 weeks only) — long-term efficacy and durability unknown
  • Small sample (n=41 completers) and single-center design limit generalizability
  • Single-blind rather than double-blind (PI aware of group assignment)
  • Stimulation intensity individually adjusted but not systematically recorded, precluding dose-response analysis
  • GluCEST, BOLD-fMRI, and serum acetylcholine are not validated PD therapeutic biomarkers — mechanistic findings remain exploratory
  • Sham site at inner arm rather than a more anatomically matched control
  • No significant between-group effect on anxiety, depression, constipation, fatigue, or cognition
  • Exclusively Chinese single-center population — external validity uncertain

Funding

Not explicitly reported; authors declared no competing financial interests

Based on: Home-Based taVNS in PD (Neurotherapeutics, 2026)

Authors: Wang R et al.

Citation: Neurotherapeutics. 2026 Jan 17;e00832. DOI:10.1016/j.neurot.2026.e00832

Content summarized and formatted by NeuroTrials.ai.