TRACK
(2026)Objective
To determine whether low-dose rivaroxaban (2.5 mg twice daily) reduces adverse cardiovascular events compared with placebo in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD stage 4 or 5, including dialysis-dependent kidney failure).
Study Summary
• Trial stopped early (August 7, 2025) for futility per DSMB after median 1.7-year follow-up; no cardiovascular benefit demonstrated
• Major bleeding significantly higher with rivaroxaban: 8.8% vs 6.0%; HR 1.51 (95% CI 1.02-2.22), P=0.04
Intervention
Rivaroxaban 2.5 mg twice daily vs placebo in patients with advanced CKD at high cardiovascular risk
Inclusion Criteria
Adults ≥18 years with CKD stage 4 or 5 (eGFR ≤25 mL/min/1.73 m²) or dialysis-dependent kidney failure, plus ≥1 of: coronary artery disease, nonhemorrhagic/nonlacunar stroke, peripheral artery disease, diabetes, or age ≥65 years
Study Design
Arms: Low-dose rivaroxaban 2.5 mg twice daily (n=727) vs Placebo (n=731)
Patients per Arm: Rivaroxaban n=727, Placebo n=731
Outcome
• Major bleeding: 8.8% vs 6.0%; HR 1.51 (95% CI 1.02-2.22), P=0.04
• Median follow-up 1.7 years; trial stopped early for futility
Bottom Line
In patients with advanced CKD (stage 4/5 or dialysis-dependent) at high cardiovascular risk, low-dose rivaroxaban did NOT reduce cardiovascular events and significantly increased major bleeding. Low-dose rivaroxaban should not be used for cardiovascular event prevention in this population.
Major Points
- First large RCT of low-dose rivaroxaban in advanced CKD (stage 4/5 including dialysis)
- No cardiovascular benefit: primary composite outcome 22.6% vs 20.7% (HR 1.09, P=.46)
- Significant harm: major bleeding 8.8% vs 6.0% (HR 1.51, 95% CI 1.02-2.22, P=.04)
- Trial stopped early on August 7, 2025 for lack of efficacy on DSMB recommendation
- Findings do NOT support extending COMPASS-style low-dose rivaroxaban regimen to advanced CKD patients
Study Design
- Study Type
- Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial
- Randomization
- Yes
- Blinding
- Double-blind (participants, investigators, study coordinators, site pharmacists, treating physicians, outcome assessors all blinded)
- Sample Size
- 1458
- Follow-up
- Median 1.7 years; final follow-up October 30, 2025
- Centers
- 90
- Countries
- Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, India, Malaysia, Nepal, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, Taiwan, Tunisia
Primary Outcome
Definition: Composite of cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, or nonfatal peripheral artery disease event
| Control | Intervention | HR/OR | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 151/731 (20.7%); 11.8 events per 100 person-years | 164/727 (22.6%); 13.0 events per 100 person-years | 1.09 (0.87-1.36) | 0.46 |
Limitations & Criticisms
- Trial stopped early for lack of efficacy at 1458 of planned 1800 patients, which may limit precision for secondary and subgroup analyses
- Median follow-up of only 1.7 years may be insufficient to detect long-term cardiovascular benefits
- Aspirin use at baseline was a stratification variable but the combination effect (vs COMPASS regimen of rivaroxaban + aspirin) is not clearly separable in this abstract
- Broad inclusion criteria (age ≥65 alone qualifies) may dilute treatment effect in truly high-risk patients
Citation
JAMA. 2026;336(4):296-305. doi:10.1001/jama.2026.9379