AMPLITUDE-O
(2021)Objective
Efpeglenatide - To evaluate whether weekly subcutaneous efpeglenatide reduces cardiovascular and renal outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes and high cardiovascular or renal risk.
Study Summary
• Risk of stroke was reduced by 26%, though not statistically significant.
Intervention
International, randomized, placebo-controlled trial across 344 sites in 28 countries. 4076 patients with type 2 diabetes (HbA1c >7%) and established cardiovascular disease or kidney disease plus ≥1 risk factor were randomized to weekly efpeglenatide (4 or 6 mg) or placebo for median 1.8 years.
Inclusion Criteria
Adults with T2DM and HbA1c >7%, and either: (1) age ≥18 with history of cardiovascular disease (CAD, stroke, PAD), or (2) age ≥50 (male) or ≥55 (female) with kidney disease (eGFR 25.0–59.9 mL/min/1.73 m²) plus ≥1 additional CV risk factor. Excluded if recent (within 3 months) GLP-1 RA or DPP-4 inhibitor use, gastroparesis, uncontrolled reflux, prolonged nausea or vomiting, severe retinal disease, or pancreatitis.
Study Design
Arms: Efpeglenatide 4 mg or 6 mg weekly vs. Placebo
Patients per Arm: Efpeglenatide: 2717; Placebo: 1359
Outcome
• MACE: HR 0.73 (95% CI: 0.58–0.92), p=0.007 [oai_citation:1‡Efpeglenatide Amplitude O.pdf](file-service://file-Ms3kCzA8wyunPeSpybG8vg)
• Composite renal outcome: HR 0.68 (95% CI: 0.57–0.79), p<0.001
• Expanded MACE: HR 0.79 (95% CI: 0.65–0.96), p=0.02
• MACE or non-CV death: HR 0.73 (95% CI: 0.59–0.91)
• GI side effects (nausea, vomiting, diarrhea) were more common in the efpeglenatide group.
Bottom Line
Efpeglenatide significantly reduced major cardiovascular events and kidney outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes and high cardiovascular or renal risk, with a tolerable safety profile mainly limited to gastrointestinal side effects.
Major Points
- Efpeglenatide (4 or 6 mg weekly) reduced MACE by 27% vs. placebo (HR 0.73, p=0.007).
- Renal composite outcome was reduced by 32% (HR 0.68, p<0.001).
- Trial included 4076 participants across 344 sites in 28 countries, followed for median 1.81 years.
- Subgroup analysis showed consistent MACE benefit across sex, age, eGFR, and SGLT2i use, but point estimates across the four geographic regions showed wide variation with overlapping CIs suggesting possible heterogeneity by geography.
- Adverse effects included higher GI side effects (nausea, constipation, diarrhea).
- Suggests efficacy of long-acting exendin-4–based GLP-1 RA, even with SGLT2 inhibitors.
Study Design
- Study Type
- Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
- Randomization
- Yes
- Blinding
- Double-blind
- Sample Size
- 4076
- Follow-up
- Median 1.81 years
- Centers
- 344
- Countries
- 344 sites across 28 countries; regions per Table 1: Canada and United States, Mexico and Central and South America, Europe, Other
Primary Outcome
Definition: MACE: nonfatal MI, nonfatal stroke, or CV/undetermined death
| Control | Intervention | HR/OR | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 9.2% | 7.0% | 0.73 (0.58–0.92) | 0.007 |
Limitations & Criticisms
- Short median follow-up (1.81 years)
- Did not reach original target event count (314 vs. 330)
- Limited generalizability to lower-risk populations
- Increased GI adverse events
- Possible heterogeneity of MACE effect by geographic region
Citation
N Engl J Med 2021;385:896–907