← Back

ARAMIS

Antiplatelet vs R-tPA for Acute Mild Ischemic Stroke (ARAMIS): A Randomized Clinical Trial

Share Share Copied! Compare

Year of Publication: 2023

Authors: Hui-Sheng Chen, Yu Cui, Zhong-He Zhou, ..., Thanh N. Nguyen

Journal: JAMA

Citation: JAMA. 2023;329(24):2135–2144. doi:10.1001/jama.2023.7827

Link: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2806532

PDF: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2806532

Clinical Question

Is dual antiplatelet therapy noninferior to intravenous thrombolysis in patients with minor nondisabling acute ischemic stroke?

Bottom Line

DAPT (clopidogrel 300mg load + aspirin 100mg for 12 days) was noninferior to IV alteplase for mRS 0-1 at 90 days in minor nondisabling stroke within 4.5h (93.8% vs 91.4%; RD +2.3%; lower CI bound -1.5% > -4.5% margin; P<0.001 for noninferiority). DAPT had fewer bleeding events (1.6% vs 5.4%; P=0.006) and less early neurological deterioration (4.6% vs 9.1%; P=0.02). 719 patients, 38 Chinese hospitals.

        Major Points
        Noninferiority confirmed: DAPT mRS 0-1 93.8% vs alteplase 91.4% (RD +2.3%; lower bound -1.5% > -4.5% margin; P<0.001).
Fewer bleeding events with DAPT: 1.6% vs 5.4% (RD -3.8%; P=0.006). sICH 0.3% vs 0.9% (NS).
Less early neurological deterioration with DAPT: 4.6% vs 9.1% (RD -4.5%; P=0.02).
NIHSS 4-5 subgroup numerically favored alteplase (85.9% vs 88.6%) — not significant but warrants study.
High crossover rate: 20.4% (87 DAPT→alteplase, 60 alteplase→DAPT). Noninferiority robust across all analyses.
33.7% missing vessel imaging data — limits large artery occlusion subgroup analysis.
Predominantly undetermined etiology (61-63%). Small vessel 23%, large artery 13-15%.
Short DAPT: 12±2 days (based on CHANCE data showing benefit plateau ~day 10).
Chinese population only. Excellent outcome rates (91-94%) much higher than PRISMS (78-82%).
With PRISMS, strongest evidence that IV alteplase not needed in minor nondisabling stroke when DAPT available.

      

Design

Study Type: Randomized, open-label, blinded endpoint, noninferiority trial

Randomization: 1

Blinding: Blinded outcome assessment only

Enrollment Period: October 2018 to April 2022

Follow-up Duration: 90 days

Centers: 38

Countries: China

Sample Size: 760

Analysis: Generalized linear models (risk difference, RR); full analysis set; adjusted and sensitivity analyses

Inclusion Criteria

Age ≥18 years
Acute ischemic stroke with NIHSS ≤5
Minor nondisabling deficits (≤1 point on single items like language, limb weakness)
mRS score 0–1 before stroke
Onset to treatment within 4.5 hours

Exclusion Criteria

Prestroke disability (mRS >1)
History of intracerebral hemorrhage
Indication for anticoagulation
NIHSS >5 or disabling deficit
Presentation >4.5h after symptom onset

Baseline Characteristics

Characteristic	Control	Active
Median Age	64 (56–71)	65 (57–71)
Sex - Female	31.4%	30.6%
Current Smoker	33.7%	33.1%
Current Drinker	16.0%	16.0%
Hypertension	48.3%	57.2%
Diabetes	24.6%	27.4%
Prior Ischemic Stroke	22.0%	22.2%
SBP	151 (139–162)	150 (137–166)
DBP	88 (80–95)	88 (81–95)
Blood Glucose >7.0 mmol/L	38.5%	35.4%
NIHSS score	2 (1–3)	2 (1–3)

Arms

Field	Dual Antiplatelet Therapy	Control
Intervention	Clopidogrel 300 mg loading then 75 mg daily for 12±2 days; Aspirin 100 mg daily for 12±2 days; followed by guideline-based treatment to 90 days	Intravenous alteplase 0.9 mg/kg (max 90 mg) per guidelines, followed by antiplatelet therapy after 24h
Duration	90 days	90 days

Outcomes

Outcome	Type	Control	Intervention	HR / OR / RR	P-value
Excellent functional outcome (mRS 0–1 at 90 days)	Primary	91.4%	93.8%	2.40%	<0.001 for noninferiority
Favorable outcome (mRS 0–2 at 90 days)	Secondary	95.4%	95.9%		0.74
Early neurological deterioration at 24h	Secondary	9.1%	4.6%		0.02
Death at 90 days	Secondary	0.9%	0.5%		0.61
Symptomatic Intracerebral Hemorrhage	Adverse	0.9%	0.3%		0.30
Any Bleeding Events	Adverse	5.4%	1.6%		0.006

Subgroup Analysis

No treatment heterogeneity observed across subgroups (e.g., age, sex, diabetes, NIHSS, vessel stenosis)

Criticisms

Open-label design may introduce bias despite blinded outcome assessment
High crossover rate (~20%) may affect internal validity
Limited generalizability outside Chinese population
Exclusion of cardioembolic strokes and lower female enrollment
Ceiling effect due to very high primary outcome rates

Funding

National Key R&D Program of China, Science and Technology Project Plan of Liao Ning Province, medication support from Shenzhen Salubris Pharmaceutical Co

Based on: ARAMIS (JAMA, 2023)

Authors: Hui-Sheng Chen, Yu Cui, Zhong-He Zhou, ..., Thanh N. Nguyen

Citation: JAMA. 2023;329(24):2135–2144. doi:10.1001/jama.2023.7827

Content summarized and formatted by NeuroTrials.ai.

ARAMIS

(2023)

Objective

To determine whether dual antiplatelet therapy (aspirin plus clopidogrel) is noninferior to intravenous alteplase for patients with minor nondisabling acute ischemic stroke.

Study Summary

• Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) was noninferior to alteplase in achieving excellent functional outcome at 90 days with excellent outcome (mRS 0–1) achieved in 93.8% with DAPT vs. 91.4% with alteplase. • Symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage occurred in 0.3% with DAPT vs. 0.9% with alteplase.

Intervention

Dual antiplatelet therapy (clopidogrel 300 mg day 1, then 75 mg daily for 12±2 days; aspirin 100 mg daily for 12±2 days) vs. intravenous alteplase (0.9 mg/kg, max 90 mg). All patients received guideline-based secondary prevention thereafter.

Study Design

Arms: Array

Outcome

• Primary: mRS 0–1 at 90 days in 93.8% with DAPT vs. 91.4% with alteplase (Risk Difference 2.3%, 95% CI −1.5 to 6.2; P<0.001 for noninferiority). • Symptomatic ICH: 0.3% with DAPT vs. 0.9% with alteplase. • Any bleeding: 1.6% vs. 5.4% (p=0.006).

Bottom Line

Major Points

Noninferiority confirmed: DAPT mRS 0-1 93.8% vs alteplase 91.4% (RD +2.3%; lower bound -1.5% > -4.5% margin; P<0.001).
Fewer bleeding events with DAPT: 1.6% vs 5.4% (RD -3.8%; P=0.006). sICH 0.3% vs 0.9% (NS).
Less early neurological deterioration with DAPT: 4.6% vs 9.1% (RD -4.5%; P=0.02).
NIHSS 4-5 subgroup numerically favored alteplase (85.9% vs 88.6%) — not significant but warrants study.
High crossover rate: 20.4% (87 DAPT→alteplase, 60 alteplase→DAPT). Noninferiority robust across all analyses.
33.7% missing vessel imaging data — limits large artery occlusion subgroup analysis.
Predominantly undetermined etiology (61-63%). Small vessel 23%, large artery 13-15%.
Short DAPT: 12±2 days (based on CHANCE data showing benefit plateau ~day 10).
Chinese population only. Excellent outcome rates (91-94%) much higher than PRISMS (78-82%).
With PRISMS, strongest evidence that IV alteplase not needed in minor nondisabling stroke when DAPT available.

Study Design

Study Type: Randomized, open-label, blinded endpoint, noninferiority trial
Randomization: Yes
Blinding: Blinded outcome assessment only
Sample Size: 760
Follow-up: 90 days
Centers: 38
Countries: China

Primary Outcome

Definition: Excellent functional outcome (mRS 0–1 at 90 days)

Control	Intervention	HR/OR	P-value
91.4%	93.8%	- (−1.5% to 6.2%)	<0.001 for noninferiority

Limitations & Criticisms

Open-label design may introduce bias despite blinded outcome assessment
High crossover rate (~20%) may affect internal validity
Limited generalizability outside Chinese population
Exclusion of cardioembolic strokes and lower female enrollment
Ceiling effect due to very high primary outcome rates

Citation

JAMA. 2023;329(24):2135–2144. doi:10.1001/jama.2023.7827

View Original Publication →

ARAMIS

Antiplatelet vs R-tPA for Acute Mild Ischemic Stroke (ARAMIS): A Randomized Clinical Trial

Clinical Question

Bottom Line

Major Points

Design

Inclusion Criteria

Exclusion Criteria

Baseline Characteristics

Arms

Outcomes

Subgroup Analysis

Criticisms

Funding

Ask about ARAMIS