ASTRO-APS
(2022)Objective
Apixaban versus warfarin for prevention of recurrent thrombosis in patients with thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome (TAPS).
Study Summary
Intervention
Apixaban 2.5 mg BID (later 5 mg BID after DSMB recommendation) vs. warfarin (INR 2–3) for 12 months in TAPS patients. Open-label, blinded endpoint (PROBE) design.
Study Design
Arms: Array
Outcome
• Major bleeding: 0 (apixaban) vs. 1 (warfarin)
• Trial terminated early due to excess thrombotic events with apixaban
• Patient satisfaction (ACTS survey) was higher with apixaban at all intervals
Bottom Line
In this small pilot RCT, apixaban was associated with a higher rate of ischemic stroke compared to warfarin among patients with TAPS, leading to early study termination and reinforcing concerns that DOACs may not be suitable alternatives to warfarin in this population.
Major Points
- Multicenter PROBE-design trial comparing apixaban and warfarin in 48 patients with thrombotic APS (TAPS).
- Trial was terminated early after 6 strokes occurred in apixaban group vs 0 in warfarin group.
- Two protocol changes: (1) apixaban dose increased from 2.5 mg to 5 mg BID, (2) exclusion of patients with history of arterial thrombosis.
- No major or clinically relevant non-major bleeds occurred in apixaban group; 1 major bleed in warfarin group.
- Patients on apixaban reported significantly higher satisfaction with anticoagulation therapy across all time points.
Study Design
- Study Type
- Randomized, open-label, blinded-endpoint (PROBE)
- Randomization
- Yes
- Blinding
- Blinded outcome adjudication
- Sample Size
- 48
- Follow-up
- 12 months
- Centers
- 2
- Countries
- United States
Primary Outcome
Definition: Composite of clinically overt thrombosis and vascular death
| Control | Intervention | HR/OR | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 events | 6 ischemic strokes | - |
Limitations & Criticisms
- Early termination due to safety concerns and funding loss
- Small sample size (n=48) limited statistical power
- Multiple protocol changes (dose escalation, exclusion of arterial thrombosis)
- Open-label design may introduce bias despite blinded adjudication
- Results not generalizable due to heterogeneous cohort and limited site participation
Citation
Woller SC, Stevens SM, Kaplan D, et al. Blood Adv. 2022 Mar 22;6(6):1661–1670.