TREND
(2023)Objective
Effectiveness of tirofiban infusion in preventing neurological deterioration in acute ischemic stroke.
Study Summary
Intervention
Tirofiban infusion (72h) vs. regular aspirin (72h) followed by aspirin alone or aspirin + clopidogrel.
Inclusion Criteria
Non-cardioembolic ischemic stroke, within 24h, NIHSS 4-20, not-candidate for IVT/MT, Asian population.
Study Design
Arms: Tirofiban vs. Aspirin
Patients per Arm: Not specified in given information
Outcome
Bottom Line
In Chinese patients with acute noncardioembolic ischemic stroke presenting within 24 h and NIHSS 4-20, 72-hour intravenous tirofiban significantly reduced early neurological deterioration within 72 h compared with oral aspirin (4.2% vs 13.2%; aRR 0.32) without increasing symptomatic ICH (0% in both groups) or systemic bleeding. The benefit did NOT translate into statistically significant improvements in 90-day mRS outcomes.
Major Points
- 426 patients were randomized (214 tirofiban, 212 aspirin) at 10 Chinese centers; 425 were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis (213 tirofiban, 212 aspirin; 1 tirofiban patient lost to follow-up within 72 h).
- Primary outcome (early neurological deterioration, defined as NIHSS increase ≥4 within 72 h) occurred in 4.2% (9/213) of tirofiban patients vs 13.2% (28/212) of aspirin patients (adjusted RR 0.32; 95% CI 0.16-0.65; P=.002).
- No patients in either group experienced symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage.
- Excellent 90-day functional outcome (mRS 0-1) was 75% (159/212) with tirofiban vs 68.4% (145/212) with aspirin (adjusted RR 1.08; 95% CI 0.97-1.21; P=.16) — NOT statistically significant.
- 90-day mRS shift analysis: median 1 (IQR 0-1.25) tirofiban vs 1 (IQR 0-2) aspirin; adjusted common OR 1.28 (95% CI 0.90-1.83; P=.17).
- 90-day mortality: 3/226 (1.3%) tirofiban vs 3/198 (1.5%) aspirin (adjusted RR 1.15; 95% CI 0.27-8.54; P=.63); serious adverse events and bleeding events did not differ significantly.
Study Design
- Study Type
- Investigator-initiated, multicenter, prospective, open-label, randomized clinical trial with blinded end-point assessment (PROBE design)
- Randomization
- Yes
- Blinding
- Open-label treatment; outcome assessors and trial steering committee blinded to allocation (PROBE).
- Sample Size
- 425
- Follow-up
- 90 days
- Centers
- 10
- Countries
- China
Primary Outcome
Definition: Early neurological deterioration (END) within 72 hours of randomization, defined as an increase in NIHSS score of ≥4 points at any time within 72 hours compared with the score immediately before randomization (modified intention-to-treat population).
| Control | Intervention | HR/OR | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 13.2% (28/212 patients) | 4.2% (9/213 patients) | - (0.16-0.65) | 0.002 |
Limitations & Criticisms
- Open-label design (only outcome assessors blinded); patients and treating physicians aware of assignment.
- Conducted exclusively in Chinese patients at 10 centers, limiting generalizability to other populations (high proportion of intracranial atherosclerosis in Chinese stroke patients).
- Excluded severe stroke (NIHSS >20), minor stroke (NIHSS <4), cardioembolic stroke, and patients receiving IV thrombolysis or endovascular thrombectomy — limits generalizability.
- Follow-up imaging was not mandatory, which may lead to underreporting of asymptomatic ICH.
- Mechanisms of neurological deterioration (stroke progression, recurrent stroke, other) were not distinguished.
- Benefit on early ND did not translate into a statistically significant improvement in 90-day mRS outcomes or in NIHSS score change at 24 h or 72 h.
- Article was corrected on July 1, 2024 to fix errors in Table 1 and Figure 2.
Citation
JAMA Neurol. 2024;81(6):594-602. doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.0868