Zolmitriptan Intracutaneous for Acute Migraine
(2021)Objective
To determine the long-term safety and tolerability profile of M207 (intracutaneous microneedle zolmitriptan 3.8 mg) in the acute treatment of migraine over 6-12 months of repeated use
Study Summary
• Efficacy was consistent with the prior placebo-controlled ZOTRIP trial: 2-h pain freedom 44%, MBS freedom 62%, pain relief 81%, sustained pain freedom 2-24 h 38% and 2-48 h 35%
Intervention
M207 3.8 mg intracutaneous zolmitriptan (two 1.9 mg microneedle patches applied simultaneously to the upper arm for 30 min per qualifying migraine attack)
Study Design
Arms: Single arm (open-label M207 3.8 mg)
Patients per Arm: 335 (safety population; 342 enrolled, 335 treated >=1 attack)
Outcome
• Secondary: 2-h pain freedom 44%, 2-h MBS freedom 62%, 2-h pain relief 81%, sustained pain freedom 2-24 h 38%, 2-48 h 35%
Bottom Line
M207 demonstrated consistent efficacy and a favorable safety profile over 6–12 months of repeated use, with mostly mild application site reactions and no serious treatment-related events.
Major Points
- Intracutaneous (microneedle) zolmitriptan 3.8mg provided rapid migraine relief: pain freedom at 1h 41.5% vs 14.3% placebo (P<0.001).
- Pain freedom at 2h: 68.3% vs 34.9% (P<0.001).
- Novel delivery: microneedle patch applied to upper arm. No injection pain. Self-administered.
- 363 patients with migraine. Sham-controlled, double-blind.
- Most bothersome symptom freedom at 2h: 72.5% vs 44.2% (P<0.001).
- Faster onset than oral triptan: significant separation from 30 minutes post-dose.
- AEs: application site erythema/pain (mild, transient). No serious AEs.
- Zolensa (Zosano Pharma). Intracutaneous delivery bypasses GI absorption (advantage during nausea).
- Addresses triptan absorption issues during migraine-associated gastroparesis.
- Novel drug delivery technology — microneedle patch as alternative to oral/injectable.
Study Design
- Study Type
- Open-label, phase 3, long-term safety and efficacy study
- Randomization
- No
- Blinding
- Unblinded
- Sample Size
- 335
- Follow-up
- 6–12 months
- Centers
- 33
- Countries
- USA
Primary Outcome
Definition: Incidence and severity of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), especially application site reactions
| Control | Intervention | HR/OR | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 94% erythema, 88% swelling, 67% bleeding (mostly mild) | - |
Limitations & Criticisms
- Open-label, single-arm design limits efficacy interpretation
- High rate of application site reactions may deter some users
- No direct comparison with oral or nasal triptans
- Limited diversity (89% female, 81% white)
- Long-term adherence beyond 12 months not assessed
Citation
Cephalalgia. 2021 Jun;41(7):721–734. doi:10.1177/0333102421999344