ATAMS
(2014)Objective
To assess the safety and efficacy of atacicept, a recombinant fusion protein that suppresses B-cell function and antibody production, in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis.
Study Summary
• Annualised relapse rates higher with atacicept vs placebo (25mg: 0.86, 75mg: 0.79, 150mg: 0.98 vs placebo 0.38)
• Mean gadolinium-enhancing T1 lesions per scan similar across groups (25mg: 2.26, 75mg: 2.30, 150mg: 2.49, placebo: 3.07)
• During safety follow-up, immunoglobulin concentrations and B-cell counts returned toward predose values and relapse rates normalized
• Findings suggest B cells and humoral immunity play a complex role in MS
Intervention
Weekly subcutaneous injections of atacicept (25, 75, or 150 mg) vs placebo for 36 weeks
Inclusion Criteria
Aged 18-60 years with relapsing multiple sclerosis (2005 McDonald criteria) and at least one of: ≥2 documented relapses within 2 years, ≥1 documented relapse within 1 year, or ≥1 gadolinium-enhancing lesion on T1-weighted MRI at screening
Study Design
Arms: Atacicept 25 mg (n=63) vs Atacicept 75 mg (n=64) vs Atacicept 150 mg (n=65) vs Placebo (n=63)
Patients per Arm: 63 / 63 / 64 / 65
Outcome
• Mean gadolinium-enhancing T1 lesions per scan similar across all groups (25mg: 2.26; 75mg: 2.30; 150mg: 2.49; placebo: 3.07)
• 7 patients discontinued due to adverse events (1 placebo, 6 atacicept); 1 death in placebo group
• Trial halted early by independent data and safety monitoring board
• Safety follow-up showed normalization of relapse rates after treatment discontinuation
Bottom Line
Atacicept unexpectedly INCREASED clinical disease activity (annualised relapse rate) in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis compared to placebo, leading to early trial termination. This demonstrates that the role of B cells and humoral immunity in MS is more complex than a simple pathogenic role, and that rigorous monitoring for negative effects is essential when exploring immunomodulation in MS.
Major Points
- Trial was TERMINATED EARLY by the independent data and safety monitoring board due to increased relapse rates in atacicept groups
- Annualised relapse rates were higher in ALL atacicept doses vs placebo (25mg: 0.86, 75mg: 0.79, 150mg: 0.98 vs placebo: 0.38)
- Despite increased clinical activity, mean gadolinium-enhancing T1 lesions per scan were SIMILAR across groups (atacicept arms trended slightly lower)
- Demonstrates clinical-radiological dissociation: MRI lesion burden did not predict clinical outcome
- During safety follow-up, immunoglobulin concentrations, B-cell counts, and relapse rates returned toward placebo values after treatment discontinuation
- Findings suggest the role of B cells and humoral immunity in MS is complex; not all B-cell directed therapies are beneficial
- Highlights need for rigorous monitoring for negative effects in MS immunomodulation trials
Study Design
- Study Type
- Randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase 2 multicenter trial
- Randomization
- Yes
- Blinding
- Double-blind (patients and study personnel masked); atacicept and placebo supplied in 1 mL prefilled glass syringes with non-transparent labels
- Sample Size
- 255
- Follow-up
- 36-week treatment period with 60-week safety follow-up added by protocol amendment; ATAMS EXT extension planned for up to 5 years
- Centers
- 47
- Countries
- Australia, Canada, USA, and 14 European countries
Primary Outcome
Definition: Mean number of gadolinium-enhancing T1 lesions per patient per scan (originally weeks 12-36; redefined as full double-blind period weeks 0-36 due to early termination)
| Control | Intervention | HR/OR | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo: 3.07 (95% CI 1.40-6.77) | Atacicept 25 mg: 2.26 (0.97-5.27); 75 mg: 2.30 (1.08-4.92); 150 mg: 2.49 (1.18-5.27) | - (Placebo: 1.40-6.77; 25mg: 0.97-5.27; 75mg: 1.08-4.92; 150mg: 1.18-5.27) |
Limitations & Criticisms
- Trial was terminated early, limiting follow-up duration and potentially affecting power for primary endpoint
- Clinical-radiological dissociation observed (MRI lesions similar but clinical relapses worse with atacicept) — mechanism not fully explained
- Primary endpoint was changed from original (weeks 12-36) to full double-blind period (weeks 0-36) due to early termination — could be viewed as post-hoc analytical change
- Annualised relapse rate was originally only a tertiary endpoint but became the key safety signal driving trial termination
- Multiple sclerosis relapses were not documented as adverse events, which may complicate safety event reporting
Citation
Lancet Neurol 2014; 13: 353-63