CLARITY Extension
(2018)Objective
Cladribine - To assess long-term safety and efficacy of cladribine treatment in patients who completed the CLARITY study
Study Summary
• No additional benefit from extending cladribine beyond initial 2-year treatment
• Higher lymphopenia rates with continuous treatment but most recovered to Grade 0-1
• No cases of PML occurred during the extension study
Intervention
Randomized extension study comparing different cladribine dosing strategies: patients from CLARITY re-randomized to receive either placebo or additional cladribine 3.5mg/kg for 2 years
Inclusion Criteria
Completed CLARITY study, normal lymphocyte count and hematological results within 28 days, discontinued DMDs ≥3 months before Extension if used during gap period
Study Design
Arms: CP 3.5mg/kg (n=98), CP 5.25mg/kg (n=92), CC 7mg/kg (n=186), CC 8.75mg/kg (n=186), PC 3.5mg/kg (n=244)
Patients per Arm: 806 total across 5 treatment groups
Outcome
• 75% of CP 3.5mg/kg patients remained relapse-free during placebo extension
• Higher lymphopenia rates with continuous treatment but most recovered to Grade 0-1
• Treatment discontinuation rates higher in continuous cladribine groups (14.0-16.1% vs 3.1-10.7%)
Bottom Line
Cladribine tablets treatment for 2 years followed by 2 years of placebo produced durable clinical benefits similar to 4 years of continuous cladribine treatment with acceptable safety profile. No additional clinical benefit was apparent from extending cladribine treatment beyond the initial 2-year period.
Major Points
- Extension study of CLARITY trial with 806 patients across 5 treatment groups over 2 years
- Patients who received cladribine in CLARITY maintained clinical benefits during 2-year placebo extension period
- 75% of patients who received cladribine 3.5mg/kg in CLARITY remained relapse-free during placebo extension
- No significant incremental benefit from additional 2 years of cladribine treatment beyond initial 2-year course
- Lymphopenia was dose-dependent with higher rates in continuous cladribine groups (40.9-53.2% Grade ≥3)
- No cases of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) occurred during extension study
Study Design
- Study Type
- Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled extension study
- Randomization
- Yes
- Blinding
- Double-blind with maintained blinding from CLARITY study
- Sample Size
- 806
- Follow-up
- 96 weeks plus 24-week supplemental follow-up
- Centers
- 133 sites (22 fewer than original CLARITY)
- Countries
- Multiple countries - not specifically detailed
Primary Outcome
Definition: Annualized relapse rate during Extension period
| Control | Intervention | HR/OR | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| PC 3.5mg/kg: 0.10 (95% CI 0.07-0.13) | CP 3.5mg/kg: 0.15 (95% CI 0.09-0.21), CP 5.25mg/kg: 0.13 (95% CI 0.08-0.19), CC 7mg/kg: 0.10 (95% CI 0.06-0.13), CC 8.75mg/kg: 0.12 (95% CI 0.08-0.16) | - (No significant differences between groups) | All comparisons >0.05 |
Limitations & Criticisms
- Not powered for efficacy analyses due to limited patient numbers from CLARITY enrollment
- Variable gap period between CLARITY and Extension (median 40.3 weeks) could confound results
- Treating physicians potentially functionally unblinded due to laboratory parameters, though evaluating physicians remained blinded
- Extension was not pre-planned, creating potential selection bias
- Limited by exploring multiple treatment comparisons without formal hypothesis testing
- High cumulative doses in continuous treatment groups led to prolonged lymphopenia recovery times
- No formal analysis of infection risk relationship to lymphopenia severity due to confounding factors
Citation
Mult Scler J. 2018;24(12):1594–1604