CARE-MS II
(2012)Objective
To assess efficacy and safety of alemtuzumab compared with interferon beta 1a in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis who have relapsed despite first-line treatment.
Study Summary
• Relapse-free at 2 years (Kaplan-Meier): 65.4% (95% CI 60.7-69.7) alemtuzumab vs 46.7% (39.5-53.5) interferon beta 1a; HR 0.53 (0.41-0.69); p<0.0001
• 42% reduction in 6-month sustained accumulation of disability with alemtuzumab (13% vs 20%; HR 0.58 [95% CI 0.38-0.87]; p=0.008)
• Safety (alemtuzumab 12 mg, safety population n=435): 90% infusion reactions (393/435), 77% infections (334/435, mostly mild-moderate, none fatal), 16% thyroid disorders (69/435), 1% immune thrombocytopenia (3/435)
Intervention
Intravenous alemtuzumab 12 mg/day for 5 days at baseline and 3 days at 12 months (with IV methylprednisolone 1 g/day x3 days premedication; aciclovir prophylaxis added by protocol amendment) vs subcutaneous interferon beta 1a 44 µg three times per week (interferon arm also received the same methylprednisolone regimen to control for steroid prophylaxis).
Inclusion Criteria
Adults 18-55 years with relapsing-remitting MS (2005 McDonald criteria), disease duration ≤10 years, ≥2 attacks in prior 2 years (≥1 in prior year), ≥1 relapse on interferon beta or glatiramer after ≥6 months of treatment, EDSS ≤5.0, cranial/spinal MRI lesions meeting protocol criteria.
Study Design
Arms: Alemtuzumab 12 mg IV (n=436) vs Interferon beta 1a 44 µg SC (n=231) vs Alemtuzumab 24 mg IV (n=173, arm discontinued)
Patients per Arm: Alemtuzumab 12 mg: 436 randomized (426 treated; 435 in safety population including 9 originally allocated 24 mg who received 12 mg); Interferon beta 1a: 231 randomized (202 treated); Alemtuzumab 24 mg: 173 randomized (170 treated; 161 in safety population)
Outcome
• Coprimary endpoint (6-month sustained accumulation of disability): 54/426 (13%) with alemtuzumab vs 40/202 (20%) with interferon beta 1a; HR 0.58 [95% CI 0.38-0.87]; p=0.008 (42% reduction)
• Relapse-free at 2 years (Kaplan-Meier): 65.4% (60.7-69.7) alemtuzumab vs 46.7% (39.5-53.5) interferon beta 1a; HR 0.53 [0.41-0.69]; p<0.0001
• Other secondary outcomes: mean EDSS change -0.17 alemtuzumab vs +0.24 IFN (p<0.0001); MSFC change +0.08 vs -0.04 (p=0.002, descriptive); T2 lesion volume median change -1.27% vs -1.23% (p=0.14, NS); new/enlarging T2 lesions 46% vs 68% (p<0.0001); Gd-enhancing lesions 9% vs 23% (p<0.0001)
• Adverse events (alemtuzumab 12 mg, safety population n=435): 90% infusion reactions (393/435), 77% infections (334/435; mostly mild-moderate, none fatal), 16% thyroid disorders (69/435), 1% immune thrombocytopenia (3/435)
Bottom Line
In patients with relapsing-remitting MS refractory to first-line therapy, alemtuzumab 12 mg significantly reduces relapse rates (by ~49%) and sustained disability accumulation (by ~42%) compared with interferon beta 1a, though with notable risks of infusion reactions, infections, and secondary autoimmunity (particularly thyroid disorders and immune thrombocytopenia) requiring risk management strategies.
Major Points
- Alemtuzumab 12 mg reduced annualized relapse rate by 49.4% vs interferon beta 1a (rate ratio 0.51 [95% CI 0.39-0.65] from recurrent-event proportional means model; p<0.0001)
- 65.4% (95% CI 60.7-69.7) of alemtuzumab patients were relapse-free at 2 years vs 46.7% (39.5-53.5) of interferon beta 1a patients; HR 0.53 (0.41-0.69); p<0.0001
- Alemtuzumab reduced 6-month sustained accumulation of disability by 42% (HR 0.58 [0.38-0.87]; p=0.008)
- Secondary MRI/clinical endpoints favored alemtuzumab: EDSS change -0.17 vs +0.24 (p<0.0001), MSFC +0.08 vs -0.04 (p=0.002 descriptive), fewer new/enlarging T2 lesions (46% vs 68%; p<0.0001) and Gd-enhancing lesions (9% vs 23%; p<0.0001); T2 lesion volume change did not differ (p=0.14)
- Safety concerns with alemtuzumab (n=435): 90% infusion-associated reactions (393/435), 77% infections (334/435, mostly mild-moderate), 16% thyroid disorders (69/435), 1% immune thrombocytopenia (3/435)
- Two-course dosing (5 days at baseline, 3 days at 12 months) demonstrated durable efficacy
- Established alemtuzumab as an option for patients with breakthrough MS disease activity on first-line therapy
Study Design
- Study Type
- Randomized, rater-masked, phase 3 controlled trial
- Randomization
- Yes
- Blinding
- Rater-masked (raters blinded to treatment assignment); open-label treatment due to differing routes of administration and adverse effect profiles precluding double-blinding
- Sample Size
- 840
- Follow-up
- 2 years
- Centers
- 194
Primary Outcome
Definition: Coprimary endpoints: (1) relapse rate (analyzed with proportional means / recurrent-event model, yielding a rate ratio — not a risk ratio), and (2) time to 6-month sustained accumulation of disability (analyzed with proportional hazards model), comparing alemtuzumab 12 mg vs interferon beta 1a in patients who received at least one dose of study drug
| Control | Intervention | HR/OR | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Relapse: 104/202 (51%) patients relapsed (201 events); Disability: 40/202 (20%) had sustained accumulation of disability [21.13% (95% CI 15.95-27.68) by Kaplan-Meier] | Relapse: 147/426 (35%) patients relapsed (236 events); Disability: 54/426 (13%) had sustained accumulation of disability [12.71% (95% CI 9.89-16.27) by Kaplan-Meier] | 0.58 (Relapse rate ratio 0.39-0.65; Disability HR 0.38-0.87) | Relapse p<0.0001; Disability p=0.008 (0.0084) |
Limitations & Criticisms
- Open-label treatment due to inability to double-blind (only rater-masked); mitigated by independent relapse adjudication and steroid-regimen matching in the IFN arm
- Alemtuzumab 24 mg arm discontinued mid-trial (December 2008), reducing statistical power for higher-dose comparison
- Interferon beta 1a comparator may not represent best available first-line therapy at the time of publication
- Aciclovir prophylaxis was added by protocol amendment and inconsistently applied (43% at month 0, 66% at month 12), likely explaining elevated herpes rates
- Notable safety concerns including secondary autoimmunity (thyroid, ITP) requiring long-term monitoring
- MSFC secondary endpoint reported descriptively because prior hierarchical step (T2 volume) did not meet significance threshold
Citation
Lancet 2012; 380: 1829-39