EBNA-1 MS Biomarker
(2026)Objective
Determine whether longitudinal EBNA-1 peptide antibody titers can distinguish MS from MOGAD and NMOSD.
Study Summary
• Among AQP4-IgG seronegative NMOSD, only 11.1% had persistent high-level titers vs 96.7% of matched MS patients (OR 236.0, 95% CI 18.6-2588.0)
• Validation cohort confirmed the signal: 95.1% MS vs 16.7% MOGAD (OR 96.4) and 17.6% NMOSD (OR 90.0)
• High-level titers in >=2 samples outperformed CSF oligoclonal bands for indicating MS
Intervention
Serial plasma EBNA-1 peptide (EBNA-1 381-452) IgG titers measured by ELISA at diagnosis and 3 follow-up samples (mean interval ~13.9 months)
Inclusion Criteria
Adults and pediatric patients diagnosed with RRMS (2017 McDonald), MOGAD (MOG-IgG >=1:160 by CBA; >=1:640 required core clinical criteria alone, 1:160-1:320 required both core and supporting clinical/imaging features), NMOSD (AQP4-IgG positive or double-seronegative), OIND, or OND; EBV seropositive; longitudinal plasma samples available
Study Design
Arms: MS (n=184) vs MOGAD (n=65) vs NMOSD (n=61) vs OIND (n=46) vs OND (n=47) in test cohort; MS (n=142) vs MOGAD (n=24) vs NMOSD (n=17) vs OIND (n=20) vs OND (n=30) in validation cohort
Patients per Arm: Test cohort: 184 MS / 65 MOGAD / 61 NMOSD / 46 OIND / 47 OND. Validation cohort: 142 MS / 24 MOGAD / 17 NMOSD / 20 OIND / 30 OND
Outcome
• Discriminated MS from AQP4-seronegative NMOSD (accuracy 95.7%) and AQP4-seropositive NMOSD (accuracy 90.2%)
• Diagnostic accuracy for MS vs MOGAD 95.2%, vs NMOSD 92.7%, vs OIND 96.5%, vs OND 95.2%
• Titers exceeded controls after 4.6 months, supporting minimum interval between measurements
Clinical Question
Can serial quantification of EBNA-1 peptide (EBNA-1 381-452) IgG antibodies distinguish multiple sclerosis from MOGAD, NMOSD, and other neurological diseases?
Bottom Line
Persistent high-level EBNA-1 peptide antibodies across serial samples are a highly specific biomarker for MS versus MOGAD, NMOSD (including AQP4-seronegative cases), and other neuroinflammatory diseases, and may serve as a useful diagnostic adjunct.
Major Points
- In the test cohort, 96.2% of MS patients had high-level EBNA-1 peptide titers in >=2 of 4 samples vs only 7.7% MOGAD (OR 303.4) and 18.0% NMOSD (OR 114.9).
- In AQP4-seronegative NMOSD, only 11.1% had persistent high-level EBNA-1 peptide antibodies vs 96.7% of matched MS patients (OR 236.0, 95% CI 18.6-2588.0).
- Findings were replicated in an independent validation cohort (MS 95.1% vs MOGAD 16.7% vs NMOSD 17.6%).
- High-level titers in >=2 plasma samples outperformed CSF oligoclonal bands for indicating an MS diagnosis.
- Kinetics analysis showed MS titers remain elevated over time while controls decline, and 4.6 months is sufficient interval between measurements.
- MOGAD and NMOSD both showed transient declines in EBNA-1 peptide titers over follow-up, suggesting distinct immunopathogenesis from MS.
Study Design
- Study Type
- Retrospective multicenter case-control diagnostic biomarker study with independent validation cohort
- Randomization
- No
- Blinding
- Not applicable (retrospective serological assay)
- Sample Size
- 4067
- Follow-up
- 2 years (mean sampling interval 13.2-13.9 months across 4 time points)
- Centers
- 3
- Countries
- Austria, Germany, USA
Primary Outcome
Definition: Diagnostic utility of persistent high-level EBNA-1 peptide antibody titers (>=2 of 4 samples) for MS vs MOGAD/NMOSD in test cohort
| Control | Intervention | HR/OR | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | <.001 |
Limitations & Criticisms
- Retrospective case-control design; prospective validation cohorts needed to confirm diagnostic performance
- A few MS patients (6 total) had consistently nondetectable EBNA-1 peptide antibodies, with no identifiable clinical or treatment features distinguishing them
- Discovery cohort had relatively low female proportion driven by heavy pediatric enrollment, though the validation cohort was more representative of adult-onset RRMS
- Race and ethnicity data not collected due to European legal/privacy restrictions, limiting generalizability across populations
- AQP4-seronegative NMOSD subgroup was small (n=9-12), limiting precision of the key MS vs AQP4-negative NMOSD comparison despite highly significant results
- Assay is not standardized/commercially available; requires the specific EBNA-1 381-452 peptide ELISA with established optical density cutoff (>=1.7)
- Cannot replace current standard diagnostic techniques (McDonald criteria, MOG-IgG, AQP4-IgG); positioned as adjunct only
Citation
JAMA Neurol. 2026;83(5):461-470. DOI: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2026.0240