PROMISE-2
(2020)Objective
Eptinezumab - To evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravenous eptinezumab in the preventive treatment of chronic migraine (CM).
Study Summary
β’ Effect was observed as early as Day 1 post-infusion.
β’ Well tolerated with a favorable safety profile.
Intervention
Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study. 1,072 adults with chronic migraine were randomized to receive IV eptinezumab 100 mg, 300 mg, or placebo at Day 0 and Week 12. Primary endpoint: change in MMDs over Weeks 1β12.
Inclusion Criteria
Adults 18β65 years with β₯15 headache days and β₯8 migraine days/month for β₯3 months; stable use of acute/preventive medications; allowed stable opioid/barbiturate use β€4 days/month.
Study Design
Arms: Eptinezumab 100 mg vs. 300 mg vs. Placebo
Patients per Arm: 100 mg: 356; 300 mg: 350; Placebo: 366
Outcome
β’ β₯75% response Weeks 1β12: 26.7% (100 mg), 33.1% (300 mg) vs. 15.0% (placebo); OR 2.0 and 2.8, respectively.
β’ β₯50% response Weeks 1β12: 57.6% (100 mg), 61.4% (300 mg) vs. 39.3% (placebo); OR 2.1 and 2.4 (p<0.0001).
β’ Migraine on Day 1: 28.6% (100 mg), 27.8% (300 mg) vs. 42.3% (placebo) (p<0.0001).
β’ Acute medication days reduced by β3.3 (100 mg) and β3.5 (300 mg) vs β1.9 with placebo.
β’ HIT-6 improvement at Week 12: β6.2 (100 mg), β7.3 (300 mg) vs β4.5 (placebo).
β’ Adverse events similar to placebo; most common: nasopharyngitis, URTI, fatigue.
Bottom Line
In patients with chronic migraine, intravenous eptinezumab 100 mg and 300 mg demonstrated significant reduction in monthly migraine days from the day after IV administration through week 12, was well tolerated, and had an acceptable safety profile with preventive effects observed as early as day 1 after administration
Major Points
- First phase 3 trial evaluating IV eptinezumab (anti-CGRP mAb) for chronic migraine prevention
- Both doses achieved primary endpoint: significant reduction in MMDs over weeks 1-12 (100 mg: -7.7 days, 300 mg: -8.2 days vs placebo -5.6 days, p<0.0001)
- Rapid onset of action: preventive effect observed on day 1 after first IV administration with >50% reduction in migraine incidence
- Day 1 migraine prevalence: 28.6% (100 mg) and 27.8% (300 mg) vs 42.3% (placebo), p<0.0001 for both doses
- High responder rates: β₯75% responder rate at weeks 1-12 was 26.7% (100 mg) and 33.1% (300 mg) vs 15.0% (placebo)
- β₯50% responder rate weeks 1-12: 57.6% (100 mg) and 61.4% (300 mg) vs 39.3% (placebo), p<0.0001
- Significant reduction in acute medication use: 100 mg -3.3 days, 300 mg -3.5 days vs placebo -1.9 days (p<0.0001 for 300 mg)
- Significant improvement in HIT-6 scores at week 12: 300 mg -2.9 difference from placebo (p<0.0001)
- Well-tolerated safety profile: TEAEs similar across groups (100 mg 43.5%, 300 mg 52.0%, placebo 46.7%)
- 93.6% of patients completed study through week 12; 95.5% of 100 mg and 96.6% of 300 mg patients received both doses
Study Design
- Study Type
- Phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study
- Randomization
- Yes
- Blinding
- Double-blind; patients, investigators, clinicians, and research personnel remained blinded throughout study; assignment concealed; double-dummy design with matching placebo; independent project nurse conducted randomization
- Sample Size
- 1072
- Follow-up
- 32 weeks total (28-day screening, 24-week double-blind treatment phase, 4-week safety follow-up); primary efficacy period through week 12
- Centers
- 128
- Countries
- United States, Spain, Ukraine, Russian Federation, United Kingdom, Republic of Georgia, Hungary, Italy, Slovakia, Germany, Czech Republic, Denmark, Belgium
Primary Outcome
Definition: Change from baseline in mean monthly migraine days (MMDs) over weeks 1 to 12, assessed with electronic diary (eDiary) data; migraine day defined using ICHD-3 criteria (lasted β₯4 hours or 30 min-4 hours relieved by acute medication; β₯2 pain features: unilateral, pulsating, moderate/severe intensity, aggravation by physical activity; β₯1 associated symptom: nausea/vomiting or photophobia and phonophobia)
| Control | Intervention | HR/OR | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean -5.6 days (from 16.2 to 10.5 days) | 100 mg: Mean -7.7 days (from 16.1 to 8.5 days); 300 mg: Mean -8.2 days (from 16.1 to 7.9 days) | - (100 mg: -2.0 (-2.9 to -1.2) difference from placebo; 300 mg: -2.6 (-3.4 to -1.7) difference from placebo) | 100 mg: <0.0001; 300 mg: <0.0001 |
Limitations & Criticisms
- Open-label with respect to route of administration (IV therapy), though double-blind regarding drug vs placebo and dose
- High placebo response rate (5.6-day reduction) attributed to novelty of treatment, IV administration, multiple active treatment arms increasing expectations, high percentage of preventive-naΓ―ve patients (59.4%), and intensive patient contact with migraine experts
- Excluded patients with significant cardiovascular disease or clinically significant concurrent medical conditions, limiting generalizability to these populations
- Excluded patients with >26 headache days during screening period, limiting applicability to most severe CM patients
- Excluded patients with history of significant opioid (β₯5 d/mo) or barbiturate use, limiting applicability to regions with high opioid prescribing patterns
- Single ethnicity dominance: 91.0% White, 8.0% Hispanic/Latino, limiting generalizability to other ethnic groups
- Industry-sponsored trial (H. Lundbeck A/S) with multiple authors as employees or with financial relationships
- Relatively short follow-up for primary endpoint (12 weeks) though study continued to 32 weeks
- No direct comparison to other approved preventive treatments for CM (e.g., onabotulinumtoxinA, other CGRP mAbs)
- 40.2% of patients had medication-overuse headache at baseline; results may differ in non-MOH CM population
- Protocol amendment during trial to include chronic migraine patients after 43.8% had been enrolled as episodic migraine only
- Serial testing procedure controlled for multiplicity but some secondary endpoints (e.g., 100 mg HIT-6) nominally significant but not formally tested
- Formation of ADAs observed (peak 17% at week 24) though no impact on efficacy or safety demonstrated; long-term immunogenicity unknown
- IV administration requires healthcare setting and monitoring, less convenient than subcutaneous or oral preventives
Citation
Neurology. 2020;94:e1365-e1377. doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000009169