D-Lay MS
(2025)Objective
To evaluate the efficacy of high-dose cholecalciferol as monotherapy in reducing disease activity in patients with clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) typical for multiple sclerosis
Study Summary
• Benefit was driven by MRI activity reduction; relapse rates did not reach statistical significance (17.9% vs 21.8%, p=0.16)
• Treatment was well tolerated with no hypercalcemia or serious adverse events related to vitamin D
Intervention
Oral cholecalciferol 100,000 IU every 2 weeks for 24 months
Inclusion Criteria
Age 18-55 years with CIS within 90 days, serum vitamin D <100 nmol/L, diagnostic MRI meeting 2010 McDonald criteria for dissemination in space OR ≥2 lesions with positive CSF oligoclonal bands
Study Design
Arms: Vitamin D (cholecalciferol 100,000 IU every 2 weeks) vs Placebo
Patients per Arm: 156 vitamin D, 147 placebo (full analysis set)
Outcome
• MRI activity: HR 0.71 (p=0.02); new lesions: HR 0.61 (p=0.003); contrast-enhancing lesions: HR 0.47 (p=0.001)
• Relapse: HR 0.69 (95% CI 0.42-1.16), p=0.16 (not significant)
Bottom Line
Oral cholecalciferol 100,000 IU every 2 weeks significantly reduced disease activity (combined relapse and MRI activity) by 34% compared to placebo (HR 0.66, p=0.004) over 24 months in patients with CIS. The benefit was primarily driven by reduced MRI activity (new lesions and contrast-enhancing lesions), while relapse rates alone did not reach statistical significance. Treatment was safe with no hypercalcemia or drug-related serious adverse events. These results support high-dose vitamin D as a potential monotherapy or add-on therapy option for early MS.
Major Points
- First large phase 3 RCT demonstrating efficacy of vitamin D monotherapy in reducing disease activity in CIS/early RRMS
- Disease activity occurred in 60.3% of vitamin D group vs 74.1% of placebo group over 24 months (HR 0.66, p=0.004)
- Number needed to treat to prevent one case of disease activity was 7.2 (95% CI 4.1-29.0)
- MRI outcomes all significantly favored vitamin D: MRI activity (HR 0.71, p=0.02), new lesions (HR 0.61, p=0.003), contrast-enhancing lesions (HR 0.47, p=0.001)
- Relapse rate was numerically lower but not statistically significant (17.9% vs 21.8%, HR 0.69, p=0.16)
- Similar efficacy observed in subgroup of 247 patients meeting 2017 McDonald criteria for RRMS at baseline
- Subgroup analysis showed greatest benefit in patients with severe vitamin D deficiency (<30 nmol/L), no spinal cord lesions, and normal BMI
- No hypercalcemia or serious adverse events related to vitamin D supplementation
- Median time to disease activity was doubled in vitamin D group (432 vs 224 days)
- Efficacy (HR 0.66) was comparable to teriflunomide in TOPIC trial (HR 0.65) and slightly less than interferon beta in REFLEX/BENEFIT trials
Study Design
- Study Type
- Multicenter, double-blind, parallel, 1:1 randomized, phase 3, placebo-controlled clinical trial
- Randomization
- Yes
- Blinding
- Double-blind. Site investigators, patients, and outcome assessors were blinded to treatment assignments. Randomization was performed by an independent statistician in blocks of 4, stratified by center and presence of contrast-enhancing lesions on diagnostic MRI. Active and placebo treatments were produced by Nexpharma.
- Sample Size
- 303
- Follow-up
- 24 months (last patient visit January 18, 2023)
- Centers
- 36
- Countries
- France
Primary Outcome
Definition: Disease activity, defined as first occurrence of relapse OR MRI activity (new and/or unequivocally enlarging brain FLAIR or spinal cord T2 lesions or contrast-enhancing T1 lesions on follow-up MRI) over 24 months of follow-up
| Control | Intervention | HR/OR | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 109/147 (74.1%) | 94/156 (60.3%) | 0.66 (0.50-0.87) | 0.004 |
Limitations & Criticisms
- MRI scans performed only at fixed intervals (3, 12, and 24 months), not necessarily capturing the precise timing of lesion development
- Median times to disease activity reflect visit times rather than actual event times
- EDSS not measured frequently enough to assess 3- or 6-month confirmed disability accumulation or NEDA-3
- Unable to assess relapse-associated worsening or progression independent of relapse activity
- Relapses and MRI activity were not diagnosed by central adjudication
- Multiple secondary endpoint comparisons and subgroup analyses increase risk of type I error
- Long enrollment period (2013-2020) with revision of McDonald criteria in 2017
- Race and ethnicity data not collected per French law, limiting generalizability assessment
- Low relapse rate may have limited ability to detect significant difference in relapse risk
- Treatment discontinued upon disease activity, preventing assessment of longer-term outcomes
Citation
JAMA. 2025;333(16):1413-1422